By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - 13 Dead in Shooting in Thousand Oaks California

As The Onion says.

"No way to prevent this", says only nation where this always happens.



                            

Around the Network
outlawauron said:
Hiku said:

There are mental people in every country. And yet every time there's a mass shooting, for some mysterious reason, you can bet your life savings that it happened in USA.

But yeah Let's-Blame-Everything-But-The-Guns, Volume 3869. Can't wait for Volume 3870. Should be some time in 2-3 weeks, right?
Will probably be at a Chuck-E-Cheese.

You know there are countries with much worse gun problems than the US? Central and South America generally have much larger problems with gun related deaths and violence.

So you want to use the gang-ridden state of third world countries as the bar for acceptability for the United States?



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

LiquorandGunFun said:

he was cleared by mental health "experts" after some calls about domestic violence and the police responded. this was a system failure in kalifornia.

how about some threads every time someone is stabbed in london? or is that not on the propaganda agenda?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/06/london-stabbings-tributes-paid-to-fifth-victim-in-six-days

When was the last time someone managed to stab 13 people in London? 



LiquorandGunFun said:

he was cleared by mental health "experts" after some calls about domestic violence and the police responded. this was a system failure in kalifornia.

how about some threads every time someone is stabbed in london? or is that not on the propaganda agenda?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/06/london-stabbings-tributes-paid-to-fifth-victim-in-six-days

Are you suggesting that unless we can stop all forms of violence, that gun control shouldn't happen?

If anything, that means Gun control has worked as someone was stabbed and not shot?




--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Apparently, the person who committed the mass shooting doesn't have a criminal record outside of speeding tickets. If this is true, I don't know how we could've restricted his gun rights. We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings.



Around the Network
Snoopy said:

Apparently, the person who committed the mass shooting doesn't have a criminal record outside of speeding tickets. If this is true, I don't know how we could've restricted his gun rights. We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings.

Your slippery slope fallacy doesn't happen here though?



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Snoopy said:

Apparently, the person who committed the mass shooting doesn't have a criminal record outside of speeding tickets. If this is true, I don't know how we could've restricted his gun rights. We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings.

the OP links to a cnn page, where theres articles related to this situation.

articles like :

Neighbor said shooter's mother "lived in fear"  (police had been called to home a few times)
Hes even had mental health specialists with them out to the house to talk to him before.
They cleared him (he wasnt crazy enough for them to do anything about it, I guess).

I think there was something about domestic violence too...  cant find atm.
So its not true he just had speeding tickets.
His family + police knew he wasnt "quite" right in the head, yet he still got to keep his gun.

 

"We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings."

That makes alot of sense actually imo.
People who have had mental break downs before, probably shouldnt own a gun.
Even if its been years without them haveing another break down.

Last edited by JRPGfan - on 08 November 2018

SpokenTruth said:
Snoopy said:

Apparently, the person who committed the mass shooting doesn't have a criminal record outside of speeding tickets. If this is true, I don't know how we could've restricted his gun rights. We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings.

Uh.....what?  How?   How does that result in them not getting any help and actually cause more mass shootings?

Because a lot of military members along with Americans, in general, WANT to keep their guns and will be afraid to get help (admit they have ptsd or any mental issues) if it stops them from having guns. They will stay silent until one day they explode and people get hurt.



Snoopy said:

Apparently, the person who committed the mass shooting doesn't have a criminal record outside of speeding tickets. If this is true, I don't know how we could've restricted his gun rights. We could say anyone who had ptsd can't have a gun, but that will result in people not getting any help and probably cause more mass shootings.

Edit: Answered my question in a prior post.



Jumpin said:
outlawauron said:

You know there are countries with much worse gun problems than the US? Central and South America generally have much larger problems with gun related deaths and violence.

So you want to use the gang-ridden state of third world countries as the bar for acceptability for the United States?

No, not at all. Please don't put words in mouth.

The hyperbole from people who don't live in the US is tiring. There's never any genuine conversation.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.