I was kind of with you on the argument until you brought in the abortion thing to misrepresent the pro choice principle. It's not like you can't have an opinion on abortion, but the principle of self determination overwhelms your opinions on it. It's 100% a woman's choice how she intends to use her body and no one can impose the physical drain of carrying anything within her body against her will.

Her body, her choice, period. 

Jackson Katz, a social researcher, asked men what they do on a daily basis to avoid being sexually assaulted. Then he asked women.

• Rape culture is when women who come forward are questioned about what they were wearing.
• Rape culture is when survivors who come forward are asked, “Were you drinking?”
• Rape culture is when people say, “she was asking for it.”
• Rape culture is when we teach women how to not get raped, instead of teaching men not to rape.
• Rape culture is when the lyrics of Robin Thicke’s ‘Blurred Lines’ mirror the words of actual rapists and was the number one song in the country.
• Rape culture is when the mainstream media mourns the end of the convicted Steubenville rapists’ football careers and does not mention the young girl who was victimized.
• Rape culture is when cyberbullies take pictures of sexual assaults and harass their victims online after the fact, which in the cases of Audrie Pott and Rehtaeh Parsons tragically ended in their suicides.
• Rape culture is when, in 31 states, rapists can legally sue for child custody if the rape results in pregnancy.
• Rape culture is when college campus advisers tasked with supporting the student body, shame survivors who report their rapes. (Annie Clark, a campus activist, says an administrator at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill told her when she reported her rape, “Well… Rape is like football, if you look back on the game, and you’re the quarterback, Annie… is there anything you would have done differently?”)
• Rape culture is when colleges are more concerned with getting sued by assailants than in supporting survivors. (Or at Occidental College, where students and administrators who advocated for survivors were terrorized for speaking out against the school’s insufficient reporting procedures.)

3. A judge who sentenced only 30 days in jail to a 50-year-old man who raped a 14-year-old girl (who later committed suicide), and defended that the girl was “older than her chronological age.”

4. Mothers who blame girls for posting sexy selfies and leading their sons into sin, instead of talking with their sons about their responsibility for their own sexual expression.

6. Supporting athletes who are charged with rape and calling their victims career-destroyers.

7. Companies that create decals of a woman bound and gagged in order to “promote their business.”

8. People who believe that girls “allow themselves to be raped.”

9. Journalists who substitute the word “sex” for “rape” – as if they’re the same thing.

10. Politicians distinguishing “legitimate rape” and stating that rape is “something that God intended to happen,” among other horrendous claims.

11. Calling college students who have the courage to report their rapes liars.

12. The ubiquity of street harassment – and how victims are told that they’re “overreacting” when they call it out.

13. Victims not being taken seriously when they report rapes to their university campuses.

14. Rape jokes – and people who defend them.

15. Sexual assault prevention education programs that focus on women being told to take measures to prevent rape instead of men being told not to rape.

16. The victimization of hospital patients, especially people with mental health issues and the elderly,  by the very people who are there to protect them.

17. Reddit threads with titles like “You just have to make sure she’s dead” when linking to the story of a 13-year-old girl in Pakistan being raped and buried alive.

18. Reddit threads dedicated to men causing women pain during sex (I’m not going to give the thread credence by linking to it).

19. Twitter hashtags that support accused rapists and blame victims.

20. Publicly defending celebrities accused of rape just because they’re celebrities and ignoring or denouncing what the victim has to say.

21. Assuming that false reporting for sexual assault cases are the norm, when in reality, they’re only 2-8%, which is on par with grand theft auto.

22. Only 3% of rapists ever serving a day in jail.

23. Women feeling less safe walking the streets at night than men do.

24. 1-in-5 women and 1-in-71 men having reported experiencing rape.

25. The fact that we have to condition ourselves not to use violent language in our everyday conversations.

We have a rape culture when the first thing we consider about the rape victim is why didn't they do something to prevent it and the first thing we consider about the alleged rapist is how this will impact his future.

Is your mind changed yet?

Kind of depends on what rights you give to a foetus. If you see it as a self aware human being with a reactive nervous system you could argue that this fetus should share the same rights as any other human. I agree the male who inpregnated het should not have a say in this. But the legal system definitely should  have a say in this, same goes with Euthanasie. 

The juridical argument is a very solid argument against abortion. Since it does not question what a women should do, but which rights a self aware unborn has. Abortion is in fact killing a human being from 13 weeks and onward since it is actually self aware.

I am pro choice until 13 weeks, but after that period aborting a child is basically murder. From that point you don't kill a few cells which are building towards something, but you are in fact killing something that could be described as an individual.

Nobody should be allowed to kill another self aware human being willingly (even if it is a foetus). Whether or not said person is a woman or not is irrelevant. If a guy causes a woman to misscariage, by an act if violenence hé also should be charged for killing another human being. 

I'll paste part of my post you missed.  (even if they haven't told you about it).

Here are a few links to some statistics that I'm sure you'll ignore, attempt to refute, claim are lies, etc...
http://www.joyfulheartfoundation.org/learn/sexual-assault-and-rape/about-issue/who-does-sexual-assault-affect
https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence
https://www.vox.com/identities/2018/2/21/17036438/sexual-harassment-me-too-assault-hollywood
https://cdn.iwastesomuchtime.com/4112013214252StatsOnSexualAssault.jpg
https://collegestats.org/resources/sexual-assault-prevention/
http://endrapeoncampus.org/eroc-blog/2016/1/26/bjs-campus-climate-survey-key-highlights
http://www.quchronicle.com/2016/11/university-explains-sexual-assault-procedures/
http://mavaw.org/facts-and-stats/
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sexual-assault-statistics_us_58e24c14e4b0c777f788d24f

For all things to be equal, 1 in 6 men must be accused of sexual assault.  Now go find me that stat.

You just matched up 1 thing against dozens and are demanding it get treated equally.

That said, why do you and others presume we don't care about false accusations?

Did you read 21?

Or did you stop at 19 so you can make your Twitter hashtag reply? 

I agree same rights should be given to all humans. So if you take it to the logical conclusion, the woman is able to sustain her life without sucking it out of the potential child. The potential child, on the other hand, is not able to sustain itself without literally leaching life out of the woman that carries it, therefore the right of the woman to self determine what sucks the life out of her body is 100 times out of 100 the most important right to uphold. You literally can't force someone to hurt their own body to sustain another. If that was the case you would make it that a court could order you to donate a kidney if that could save another human's life. No one makes that argument because it's obviously absurd, so how can it be valid for the anti choice crowd? 

We don't even need to get to the point that 1 of those beings is actually conscient, thinking and able to make decisions, while the other is literally not existing as a person yet. 

Almost all your articles link to the same study that got debunked a million times. A study with a tiny sample size of self register subjects. That in itself is critized because obiously thouse afected will be more inclined to participate.

The second point that is heavily critized is what they deem sexual assault. They include if a woman regrets it the next day for whatever reason. They include a unwanted sexual advancement even if it lead to nothing. and basicly if the woman "feels" asaulted.

And the last thing this study is heavily criticized is the idea that 95% of victims dont come foward, wich comes out their ass. While yes, its true that some assaults go unreported for the reasons they mentioned, they show no reason at all to asume its 95% unreported. 

So after the real number gets inflated like crazzy by them saying that any little thing that makes a girl unconfortable sexual assault, then they multiply the number by 20 to make up the 95% unreported and then you get your 1 in 5. Wich is total nonsense.