That's a strange attitude to take towards someone you're hiring. Wouldn't you want to know how they'd do on the job before hiring them?

What I'm really curious about now though is, what exactly are you hoping for from this guy? Are you an environmentalist? Are you pro big, international business over small businesses or consumers? Are you anti-abortion? What do you think this guy will be the decided vote on that you're excited about? Because if you're calling accusations that he'll be anti-environment and anti-consumer fear mongering, that suggests you think those are things worth being afraid of. If you didn't, you'd just say "who cares if he's anti-environment!" or "I think all his anti-environment decisions are correct!" or whatever the case may be for each issue.

Why should he bother? You'd just say you agree with Kavanaugh. I sincerely doubt you'd accept it if he listed a specific "this entity v this entity" case and what it was about and why he disagreed, and while I'm sure you'll claim that you'll play fair, it'd still be a waste of time. He shouldn't have to have a damn law degree so as to be able to make a detailed argument against a specific decision, he should just be able to know that in general, it seems Kavanaugh frequently rules in favor of large corporations over environmental organizations, and be able to suspect a bias there. You can make arguments for and against large corporations and have them make enough sense that it doesn't just look like the judges wrote "because we say so" as the reasoning. That's why we have the nomination process in the first place. You think the Republicans know in detail every court case he's done? Of course they don't! They know he's decided the way they want, and that's all they care about. So long as a judge has the credentials and recommendations to suggest he writes strong, sound opinions in his rulings, it's easy to argue that he's "qualified". There are tons of liberal judges one could say that about too that they "never make rulings based simply on whose name they like better" yet you'd probably call out some pro-environment decision and call it wrong just as collin would call out an anti-environment decision and call it wrong. Being able to name drop cases and why you disagree with them is not a requirement for being against a particular judge. A person can easily be aware that a judge's decisions tend to lean a certain way and not like the bias they see. That is grounds enough. If choosing a judge were entirely about the quality of the reasoning they use when writing the opinions in their rulings, the President wouldn't choose judges, and the Senate would have no say. It would be an independent legal organization's duty to determine who to nominate. It might honestly be better that way, I don't know.

Honestly, he could nominate the most "liberal" judge around and the Democrats  would still do everything they can to block the nomination. As for the current situation, innocent until proven guilty is all I can say.

Put him on a polygraph test, if he refuses then cancel his appointment

Denying him a promotion doesn't destroy his life. Convicting him of attempted rape or other sexual crime would ruin his life, but that isn't what's happening. It's just a job interview. If he's rejected, he goes back to his cushy lifetime judge appointment.

It won't be ruined though, and confirming him won't fix whatever damage Ford may have caused.

Perfectly said, and that was my original point.  The Demos are convinced that in a possible, future ruling, that Kavanaugh will be the deciding vote to outlaw abortion in the United States. 

Hence, these shenanigans started with Diane Feinstein and have only continued with other pro-choice Demos, whether they hold office or are just ordinary citizens.  They are passionately AGAINST Kavanaugh and are willing to try anything, no matter how desperate or unethical, to stop his nomination.

I didn't know you were ever a SCOTUS nominee?  Furthurmore, I made it through another day without being a Powerball winner.  However, fear not my VGC friends, I'm ok with that and my life wasn't ruined or anything.

But just imagine how my life would be so much happier had I won that jackpot!

He's been through 6 checks regarding his professional life, such as his job, people he worked with, friends at work, post on facebook etc. Those checks did not include his high school days, or his high school friends, so this gonna be good.

About the pussy grabber. I doubt those were "sexual relations" It sounds more like he did it on impulse from the way he bragged about it on the Access Hollywood video.

^ Should Brett Kavanaugh SCROTUS get a Nomination ?