How does this make sense? How can Nintendo allow this exploit to exist? How can people claim Nintendo is anti-consumer when their practices allow for less than $5 to cover an entire year's subscription? It's almost like the people making anti-Nintendo threads just hate Nintendo and aren't coming from a pro-consumer standpoint like they pretend to be. It's almost like there is an unmistakable bias in their threads and posts that makes it difficult to take what they write seriously.