Quantcast
Locked: Justin Trudeau clashes with eldery lady over illegal immigration: 'you Madame will have no place here'

Forums - Politics Discussion - Justin Trudeau clashes with eldery lady over illegal immigration: 'you Madame will have no place here'

Justin Trudeau

...dresses well 9 23.08%
 
...speaks French 8 20.51%
 
...invented peoplekinds 4 10.26%
 
... is the son of Fidel Castro 18 46.15%
 
Total:39

How can we be tolerant to those who are intolerant towards our own culture and have zero interest into assimilating with the country that so openly tolerates their presence and ability to leach off our economy.



Around the Network

It’s like that’s one guy telling republicans to gtfo of NY, they have no place there lol. They are the “tolerant ones” lol.



Y'all know that 'being tolerant' doesn't mean that you unequivocally accept any and all potential worldviews or behaviours, right? Like, tolerance is the idea that you accept a person regardless of their creed, their sexuality, their identity, or political affiliation by default but only as long as those people aren't using their creed, sexuality, identity, or political affiliation to harm others. The basic mentality of tolerance and the concept of it as it's been pushed by liberals is that "As long as you're not hurting anyone, I see no right to discriminate or judge; I have tolerance for anyone's decisions or affiliation, but that doesn't mean I'm a twat."

It is not 'tolerant' to openly encourage the KKK to discriminate against black folks. It is not an act of 'tolerance' to turn a blind eye to misogyny or harassment of females in the workplace (as an example.) By the definition of many here who are seeking to poke holes in the concept of tolerance in order to devalue any left-leaning stances, "tolerance" means 'Absolute tolerance'. Or more precisely "EVERY SINGLE PERSON MUST NEVER INTERACT WITH ANOTHER".

Point is, cut that shit out. It's pathetic seeing people try to make 'tolerant' people look bad because they don't tolerate nazis or KKK or Alex Jones other objectively terrible groups.

Quit misrepresenting folks who just want to make the world a better place by giving everyone a chance BEFORE judging them for being racist bastards.



Xeon said:
TheLastStarFighter said:

So you support illegal immigration?  Most immigrants I know dislike when people cheat a system they had to work within.

I support helping people who are desperate. Like I said, my parents fled illegally from Vietnam to Hong Kong where I was then born. We came to Canada legally but that wouldn't have been possible if my parents didn't take the risk of fleeing illegally in the first place.

It was certainly tough for my parents to integrate to Canada, but they did what they could. Fortunately, I was much more successful all thanks to their risk and sacrifice. I am grateful to Canada as well and work hard to pay back a nearly impossible debt.

You cant compare Vietnamese to Middle eastern immigrants, they're nothing alike.



Alara317 said:
Y'all know that 'being tolerant' doesn't mean that you unequivocally accept any and all potential worldviews or behaviours, right? Like, tolerance is the idea that you accept a person regardless of their creed, their sexuality, their identity, or political affiliation by default but only as long as those people aren't using their creed, sexuality, identity, or political affiliation to harm others. The basic mentality of tolerance and the concept of it as it's been pushed by liberals is that "As long as you're not hurting anyone, I see no right to discriminate or judge; I have tolerance for anyone's decisions or affiliation, but that doesn't mean I'm a twat."

It is not 'tolerant' to openly encourage the KKK to discriminate against black folks. It is not an act of 'tolerance' to turn a blind eye to misogyny or harassment of females in the workplace (as an example.) By the definition of many here who are seeking to poke holes in the concept of tolerance in order to devalue any left-leaning stances, "tolerance" means 'Absolute tolerance'. Or more precisely "EVERY SINGLE PERSON MUST NEVER INTERACT WITH ANOTHER".

Point is, cut that shit out. It's pathetic seeing people try to make 'tolerant' people look bad because they don't tolerate nazis or KKK or Alex Jones other objectively terrible groups.

Quit misrepresenting folks who just want to make the world a better place by giving everyone a chance BEFORE judging them for being racist bastards.

That's wrong. You guys dont give anyone a chance. Leftists make judgement about people based on one time actions or mistakes then brand them for life with it. They're not interested in forgiveness or tolerance, they're interested in smearing opposition. Problem is you have created your own definition of tolerance that you're spewing here and you've defined it for everyone else. That's the totalitarian left. You've defined it as tolerance of certain pet groups that you like (minorities) and intolerance of certain groups you dont like. Tolerance without definition would be absolute, you guys created a definition to protect some and not others.



Around the Network
vivster said:

So he told some intolerant bitch to stop being intolerant? Seems like a good thing. So standing up against bigots is now a bad thing apparently?

This. Not sure what the point of this thread is.



Yep Trudeau will make a great job of making Canada not Canada.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Alara317 said:
Y'all know that 'being tolerant' doesn't mean that you unequivocally accept any and all potential worldviews or behaviours, right? Like, tolerance is the idea that you accept a person regardless of their creed, their sexuality, their identity, or political affiliation by default but only as long as those people aren't using their creed, sexuality, identity, or political affiliation to harm others. The basic mentality of tolerance and the concept of it as it's been pushed by liberals is that "As long as you're not hurting anyone, I see no right to discriminate or judge; I have tolerance for anyone's decisions or affiliation, but that doesn't mean I'm a twat."

It is not 'tolerant' to openly encourage the KKK to discriminate against black folks. It is not an act of 'tolerance' to turn a blind eye to misogyny or harassment of females in the workplace (as an example.) By the definition of many here who are seeking to poke holes in the concept of tolerance in order to devalue any left-leaning stances, "tolerance" means 'Absolute tolerance'. Or more precisely "EVERY SINGLE PERSON MUST NEVER INTERACT WITH ANOTHER".

Point is, cut that shit out. It's pathetic seeing people try to make 'tolerant' people look bad because they don't tolerate nazis or KKK or Alex Jones other objectively terrible groups.

Quit misrepresenting folks who just want to make the world a better place by giving everyone a chance BEFORE judging them for being racist bastards.

Wow...sounds like this advice would be better-directed at Trudeau than posters here.  

Yeah, I think before your mini-lecture the majority of people understood the paradox of tolerance here--as it's already been brought up before.  Judging by the content of the OP's link, the snarky jabs at the "tolerant" left are still applicable.  We've seriously come to a point where an uncomfortable idea like "think of the taxpayers ahead of immigrants illegally crossing into Canada" has to be likened to intolerance by the ELECTED people in charge; on top of that, the ever-so-handy analogies to KKK, nazis, and Alex Jones are never too far behind!  

Last edited by coolbeans - on 27 August 2018

Hopefully a new government comes in to power next year and stops all this bullshit.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

Helloplite said:
vivster said:

So he told some intolerant bitch to stop being intolerant? Seems like a good thing. So standing up against bigots is now a bad thing apparently?

This. Not sure what the point of this thread is.

maybe because nobody seems to even understand what she was asking for. the question was not intolerant, in fact the question made a lot of sense, but Trudeau just dismissed it without even understanding it, and clearly a lot of people just buy that the lady was racist