alternine said: Yeah they're going to ignore 81.2 million users...lol. Nice PR move though Bethesda |
Implying those 81.2 million people only play ps4
alternine said: Yeah they're going to ignore 81.2 million users...lol. Nice PR move though Bethesda |
Implying those 81.2 million people only play ps4
kurasakiichimaruALT said: Bethesda should be careful. Sony can retaliate by replicating Fallout and Elder Scrolls, take their market share and make it even better. |
Yeah, just look at how superior PS All Stars Battle Royal is compared to Smash Wii U/3DS
❌ BANNED: Trolling ~ CGI
Last edited by CGI-Quality - on 13 August 2018Make this move with Fallout 76 and then I’ll think Bethesda means business. Because there’s no way Sony will capitulate for a card game when Fortnite didn’t cause Sony to budge. They’re really trying to make fetch happen.
PC GAMING: BEST GAMES. WORST CONTROLS
A mouse & keyboard are made for sending email and typing internet badassery. Not for playing video games!!!
HoangNhatAnh said:
Yeah, just look at how superior PS All Stars Battle Royal is compared to Smash Wii U/3DS |
Both games aren’t great. One of them is hyped up mediocrity.
PC GAMING: BEST GAMES. WORST CONTROLS
A mouse & keyboard are made for sending email and typing internet badassery. Not for playing video games!!!
Bethesda has a PR move where they seem like they're pro consumer*
Same day, Bethesda Threatens to sue a man for selling his new and sealed game*
FentonCrackshell said:
Both games aren’t great. One of them is hyped up mediocrity. |
Great to you or not, doesn't change the fact one is definitely superior to the other
Mnementh said:
Sorry, publishers gave in the past a lot of shit to Nintendo if they made insane rules and left games off of Nintendo platforms, and they usually were applauded by the gaming community for it. Nintendo often did not give a fuck, but look what that lead to. Same with Microsoft and their plan for family share and so on at the XB1-reveal. You really want that for Sony? |
If you're referencing the worst behavior Nintendo has been guilty of in the past, various strongarm tactics they employed on third parties in the NES/SNES days, I don't think Sony not allowing cross-play with it's console competitors is going to have as much of a negative impact. The scale of the 2 situations is quite disparate. If that is indeed what you're talking about. And just to be clear, I do think it's bullshit that Sony won't allow account sharing to be integrated. I'm also not against cross-play per say, but can certainly understand why Sony wants no part of it as far as it concerns getting into bed with Microsoft. If cross play matters to Bethesda, perhaps they can up the ante, and die on the hills of Fallout 76 and Doom Eternal.
- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."
FentonCrackshell said: Make this move with Fallout 76 and then I’ll think Bethesda means business. Because there’s no way Sony will capitulate for a card game when Fortnite didn’t cause Sony to budge. They’re really trying to make fetch happen. |
It makes more sense that Bethesda take this stance with Legends than with 76. Legends is a card game perfectly playable on smart phones and a game that is propped up via micro-transactions.
Cross-access is ideal for a free-to-play game and I imagine Bethesda doesn't want what happened to Fortnite players to also happen to their players.
Liquid_faction said: Bethesda has a PR move where they seem like they're pro consumer* |
Did they frame their Legends policy as such?
Liquid_faction said: Same day, Bethesda Threatens to sue a man for selling his new and sealed game* |
Story?
HoangNhatAnh said:
Yeah, just look at how superior PS All Stars Battle Royal is compared to Smash Wii U/3DS
❌ BANNED: Trolling ~ CGI |
Interesting, this was trolling? Not the huffy comment about Sony should clone Bethesda soft to destroy them, but this reply? Hmm, interesting.
COKTOE said:
If you're referencing the worst behavior Nintendo has been guilty of in the past, various strongarm tactics they employed on third parties in the NES/SNES days, I don't think Sony not allowing cross-play with it's console competitors is going to have as much of a negative impact. The scale of the 2 situations is quite disparate. If that is indeed what you're talking about. And just to be clear, I do think it's bullshit that Sony won't allow account sharing to be integrated. I'm also not against cross-play per say, but can certainly understand why Sony wants no part of it as far as it concerns getting into bed with Microsoft. If cross play matters to Bethesda, perhaps they can up the ante, and die on the hills of Fallout 76 and Doom Eternal. |
Oh, it can even be so simple stuff like missing voice chat or achievements on Nintendo. In my opinion it is extremely simple to add these features, but Nintendo is too stupidly stubborn to do that. And they get shit for that. And this is right. But Sony should get away with their shitty practice? If people say it does not matter much, that is true (just like voice chat and achievements). But even if it does not matter much for sales, it is not ever something that should be defended.