By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - 5000 Posts! Zomg! I'm so Obsessed!

Words Of Wisdom on 14 April 2008
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


I think it was around the 2300 mark that your posts saw an upward trend in quality.  Well done.  ^_^

Around the Network
DMeisterJ on 14 April 2008
Words Of Wisdom said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


I think it was around the 2300 mark that your posts saw an upward trend in quality.  Well done.  ^_^

DMeisterJ - Reformed spammer.



totalwar23 on 14 April 2008
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username?

And fourth-You make a insignificant thread and lambast me for not contributing constructively? 



DMeisterJ on 14 April 2008
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


 First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username? 

 

Actually, 'total ass' wasn't a play on your username, but it fits well.

Also, it's no problem making this thread, but the problem is spamming. I am not spamming, nor am I a spammer.  And if you've looked through my post history, you can see that my posts do have content.  But I won't continue arguing with you.

And etecoon was joking, we're cool.

 



kenzomatic on 14 April 2008

I kinda always assumed the reason he chose the name totalwar23 was because he was 23 and liked to get into arguments. IDK



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.

ioi + 1
Around the Network
bchery21 on 14 April 2008
totalwar23 said:

this is funny...but congrats DMeisterJ if being a VG Obsessive was u'r goal 



totalwar23 on 14 April 2008
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username?

Actually, 'total ass' wasn't a play on your username, but it fits well.

Also, it's no problem making this thread, but the problem is spamming. I am not spamming, nor am I a spammer. And if you've looked through my post history, you can see that my posts do have content. But I won't continue arguing with you.

And etecoon was joking, we're cool.

 


 My problem is not with the content of your posts. My problem is that you do make a lot of crap posts (along with everyone else except for a few) yet you go around saying "people who know me knows my posts are better than Soriku's or leo-j's". That's arrogance and it doesn't shed a good light on you. You've already admitted that you're a "reformed spammer" after the 2300 mark and yet condemn Soriku and leo-j as spammers and your posts have content. Again, arrogance or some other word that escapes me at the moment.



DMeisterJ on 14 April 2008
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username?

Actually, 'total ass' wasn't a play on your username, but it fits well.

Also, it's no problem making this thread, but the problem is spamming. I am not spamming, nor am I a spammer. And if you've looked through my post history, you can see that my posts do have content. But I won't continue arguing with you.

And etecoon was joking, we're cool.

 


 My problem is not with the content of your posts. My problem is that you do make a lot of crap posts (along with everyone else except for a few) yet you go around saying "people who know me knows my posts are better than Soriku's or leo-j's". That's arrogance and it doesn't shed a good light on you. You've already admitted that you're a "reformed spammer" after the 2300 mark and yet condemn Soriku and leo-j as spammers and your posts have content. Again, arrogance or some other word that escapes me at the moment.


Your definition of arrogance needs work.



totalwar23 on 14 April 2008
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username?

Actually, 'total ass' wasn't a play on your username, but it fits well.

Also, it's no problem making this thread, but the problem is spamming. I am not spamming, nor am I a spammer. And if you've looked through my post history, you can see that my posts do have content. But I won't continue arguing with you.

And etecoon was joking, we're cool.

 


My problem is not with the content of your posts. My problem is that you do make a lot of crap posts (along with everyone else except for a few) yet you go around saying "people who know me knows my posts are better than Soriku's or leo-j's". That's arrogance and it doesn't shed a good light on you. You've already admitted that you're a "reformed spammer" after the 2300 mark and yet condemn Soriku and leo-j as spammers and your posts have content. Again, arrogance or some other word that escapes me at the moment.


Your definition of arrogance needs work.

It probably does as it's early in the morning right now and I have to finish homework. But say you for the charge I have laid out against you? Or are you just going to attack me on that? What's the word for thinking you're above the criticism you have leveled against others that do the same thing you do? Oh right - I knew it come to me : hypocrisy.

DMeisterJ on 14 April 2008
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
totalwar23 said:
DMeisterJ said:
super_etecoon said:
Congrats. You're almost half the man that Soriku and Leo-J are.

No, I'm the exact same amount, I'm no spammer. My posts have content.


Yep, and this thread proves it. Oh how the ghost of Wiiforever is calling me.


I don't think that anyone would call me a spammer. My posts do have content. Not every single solitary post, as this thread proves that, but I think people know I have oodles more content in my threads than either of the two people you just mentioned.

And if you're going to conotine being a total ass, then please don't post in this thread anymore.


First: super_etecoon mentioned those two names, not me.

Secondly, I like how you think your posts are so much better than either leo-j and Soriku when looking at your posting history, a lot of them are throw-away posts. Of course, lately, I've been making a lot of snipe remarks but I don't go around saying my posts have content and are better than other people. At least Soriku contributes boatloads of information to the site as well as subject starters. Also, considering Wiiforever was banned for making a self congratulary thread for his post count (and everyone subsequently realized he was making a lot of crap post), I can't believe you have the nerve to do the exact same thing and you're getting away with it, along with saying your posts have content and Soriku is a spammer.

And third, nice immaturity there. I believe personal attacks are against the rules, no? "total ass"? Is that a play on my username?

Actually, 'total ass' wasn't a play on your username, but it fits well.

Also, it's no problem making this thread, but the problem is spamming. I am not spamming, nor am I a spammer. And if you've looked through my post history, you can see that my posts do have content. But I won't continue arguing with you.

And etecoon was joking, we're cool.

 


My problem is not with the content of your posts. My problem is that you do make a lot of crap posts (along with everyone else except for a few) yet you go around saying "people who know me knows my posts are better than Soriku's or leo-j's". That's arrogance and it doesn't shed a good light on you. You've already admitted that you're a "reformed spammer" after the 2300 mark and yet condemn Soriku and leo-j as spammers and your posts have content. Again, arrogance or some other word that escapes me at the moment.


Your definition of arrogance needs work.

It probably does as it's early in the morning right now and I have to finish homework. But say you for the charge I have laid out against you? Or are you just going to attack me on that? What's the word for thinking you're above the criticism you have leveled against others that do the same thing you do? Oh right - I knew it come to me : hypocrisy.
 

You're taking this way too seriously.

SERIOUSLY.