https://www.mediaite.com/online/time-magazine-stands-by-cover-after-photo-correction-captures-stakes-of-this-moment/

Well yes and no.  

How can a picture lie.  Would it be any different if they just posted a headline that says Trump administration mandates taking children away from their parents.  What if they just found a photo of the crying children within the containment camps and photograph them, oh I forgot, they cannot get access because they will not let them.  The photo is used to illustrate what the article is talking about.  Really, its not like this is new to any publication and has been used throughout history.  Now, if you can refute what the text within the article says, that's a whole different issue.  Trying to saying the photo is lying without actually reading the article is straw man politics.  Is the article wrong based on its portrayal of the facts concerning the issue.

Trump is absolutly to blame for separation at the border.  This was a mandate executive order from him.  Yes the photo was not of a child who was separated at the border but the image and the administration to mandate all children be separated from their parents is a direct order from the President.  

Everyone keep taking about the law was put into place during the Clinton presidency, but what you continue to leave out is that the change made by Trump administration.  First, all illegal crossing was a misdemeanor in previous administrations.  Even if you read the article this rule was put into place, there wasn't any mandatory rule to remove children from their parents.  It was always the discretion of the border official and only if the child was in danger.  Because illegal immigration was a misdemeanor during Obama administration, if they caught you, they just released you back over the border.  Read up on the catch and release policy.  Next read up on the memo Session gave to the southern border mandating everyone is to be detained, child taken and held for criminal processing.  Last but not least read up on how now Trump administration just fell back to the catch and release policy during Obama administration.  The zero policy is still in place, but now officials are back to what they did before.  Meaning, it was always a mandate from Trump administration to take children from their parents because they believe this would be a deterrent.

Yet he doesn't ban people from countries with which he does business with.

Though the list of US trading partners is getting shorter. 

You can edit a pic. 😹

The article itself can lie about the situation surrounding the pic and people can falsely associate it something with that's false or something it doesn't have anything to do with it.

Lets see how it works out.

Sorry I meant him personally. And his family. As ridiculous as it is.

Ok. So what would you do? Send the kids to prison with their parents? Even people born in America doesn't get any sympathy when they break the law and their kids gets taken away from them. I get that its horrible for kids to be separated from their parents, but what is the alternative?

Either we get a recession or its the end of democracy!

I get the logic, you don't want the country to do so well that it makes a leader you hate look good. But actually wanting people to suffer just so Trump can be less popular, that's another level. I'm glad most the audience didn't applaud that statement, they are his fan and they realized that's crazy.

I don't support making death threats. But that's something people on the left and right are guilty of.

The baker did serve gay people. He simply didn't want to make a custom cake for a gay wedding because of his religious beliefs. Don't change the reality to fit your narrative.

We have different perspectives on other things you mentioned and I don't want to argue all of them. There are regulations I support and others that just make get in the way of businesses, job creation, hurt education options, etc. We will see how the tariffs pan out, tax cuts along with reduced (efficient) spending it better. This is a bigger debate than I'm interested in right now.