Pemalite said:
Rightling said:
What if a pedophile wanted you to paint him with the child he molested?
I'm not saying pedophile = homosexual, but being human is making judgements. To a Christian, homosexuality is reprehensible. In fact, to most of the world outside the West, homosexuality is seen as disgusting and undesirable. We are the strange ones.
|
Your analogy is blatantly bullshit.
A child cannot provide Adult consent, so it's illegal to start with. - Not to mention the psychological damage you would potentially do to said child in having their person portrayed in such a reprehensible manner. Thus... That is why your analogy will not work.
Homosexuality allows for two Adults to provide Adult consent, which is why it cannot and should not morally ever be compared.
|
But you are judging a pedophile based on their sexual orientation, right? What if they were just born that way, they have no choice being attracted to children. I'm not comparing the morality, I'm saying that we do judge people. You find pedophiles morally wrong and homosexuality okay but to a lot of other people, homosexuality is just as disgusting. They don't care that it's two adults or that it's legal.
In any case, I don't think a business should be forced to provide a service by the government. If it was a vital service like health care, electricity or internet, that would be different. The less the government is involved in guiding morality, the better.