By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - US Supreme Court: Christian baker does not have to bake 'the gay cake'

Ka-pi96 said:
Snoopy said:

No, the baker still can't say "You're a gay customer, so therefore you can't have a cake". However, the customer can't force the baker to do something they don't feel comfortable with. Such as making a gay cake. It's like if I try to sue McDonald's for not making tacos. You can't force companies to make something they don't feel comfortable with.

That's not a very good comparison. Bakery's make cakes anyway. It wasn't what they were making, it was who they were making it for.

A better comparison would be McDonald's refusing to serve you because you're black. Do you think that would be ok?

They don't make "gay cakes", but they can make you a regular cake. It is against their religious belief and it's an item they don't create. Should someone ask them to make a cake with a racist slur, they have the right to deny that and hopefully any decent bakery would. Again, they can't deny someone based on sexual preference or skin color, but they can refuse to make an item they don't agree with or don't want to make.

Last edited by Snoopy - on 12 January 2019

Around the Network
SpokenTruth said:
Snoopy said:

No, the baker still can't say "You're a gay customer, so therefore you can't have a cake". However, the customer can't force the baker to do something they don't feel comfortable with. Such as making a gay cake. It's like if I try to sue McDonald's for not making tacos. You can't force companies to make something they don't feel comfortable with.

What the hell is a gay cake?

A simple google image search will show you hundreds of examples.



MrWayne said:
The law may be on his side but I don't understand how anyone can defend this asshole for being homophobic.

That baker is the same asshole like a billion other friendly christians that follow their beliefs,so  im just a bit more convinced that the gay couple might be the bigger assholes and if you think all christians are homophobic or that someone who cant make a cake for someone because of beliefs is homophobic then you do not really understand the phobic part.



Sorry double post



Immersiveunreality said:
MrWayne said:
The law may be on his side but I don't understand how anyone can defend this asshole for being homophobic.

That baker is the same asshole like a billion other friendly christians that follow their beliefs,so  im just a bit more convinced that the gay couple might be the bigger assholes and if you think all christians are homophobic or that someone who cant make a cake for someone because of beliefs is homophobic then you do not really understand the phobic part.

Religious beliefs aren't a justification for homophobia just as they aren't a justification for racism, anti semitism, ect..
It also doesn't matter how many people do the same.



Around the Network
MrWayne said:
Immersiveunreality said:

That baker is the same asshole like a billion other friendly christians that follow their beliefs,so  im just a bit more convinced that the gay couple might be the bigger assholes and if you think all christians are homophobic or that someone who cant make a cake for someone because of beliefs is homophobic then you do not really understand the phobic part.

Religious beliefs aren't a justification for homophobia just as they aren't a justification for racism, anti semitism, ect..
It also doesn't matter how many people do the same.

So we burn him at the stake for being afraid of god's punishment, sorry i do not think that the right way to deal with it.

It is not a justification but at least try to understand the fear for going against religion to some people and that does not mean they hate the gays.



Immersiveunreality said:
MrWayne said:

Religious beliefs aren't a justification for homophobia just as they aren't a justification for racism, anti semitism, ect..
It also doesn't matter how many people do the same.

So we burn him at the stake for being afraid of god's punishment, sorry i do not think that the right way to deal with it.

It is not a justification but at least try to understand the fear for going against religion to some people and that does not mean they hate the gays.

of course we should try to understand his fear and his religious beliefs but we should not be apologetic and say "Well that's his believe, we should respect that.". No, we should challenge such believes or else nothing will change.
The cathlic church supported anti semetism for over 1000 years and only stoped because the presure become to big.



SpokenTruth said:
Snoopy said:

A simple google image search will show you hundreds of examples.

Looked like normal wedding cakes but the same sex as the wedding couple on top. 

That said, I was being snarky.  As in a cake can't be gay - it's an inanimate object.

 

There is a lot of gay pride cakes too. Personally, I would make the cake. I don't have a problem with it. I just don't want companies to make something they don't feel comfortable with.



coolbeans said:
MrWayne said:

of course we should try to understand his fear and his religious beliefs but we should not be apologetic and say "Well that's his believe, we should respect that.". No, we should challenge such believes or else nothing will change.
The cathlic church supported anti semetism for over 1000 years and only stoped because the presure become to big.

Well...fine but said challenge shouldn't come at the behest of the government.  Which is why you see a defense for the baker in this specific context.  There's a conflict at play here in regards to said baker (or photographer, painter, etc.) being compelled to use their artistic expression in some capacity for something they find objectionable to their sincerely-held beliefs.  And since we have a free market there's already a much simpler response: "If that's the hill you want to die on, you won't receive any of my money."

EDIT: Or go outright further and ostracize these kinds of business partners from your personal life.  There's no unethical use of force via the gov't, no waste of resources from attention-seeking couples going lawsuit-shopping, and everything's clean and tidy as a result.  

Thanks for this comment, i fully agree.



Dante9 said:
I'm an atheist, so if that fact came up in their bakery, they might refuse me my cake as well.
I think they have every right to choose their customers, and I have the right to take my business elsewhere. It really is as simple as that. It's freedom. Anything other would be problematic.
Why would I even want a cake from someone who really doesn't want to make one for me? I'd rather want one from someone who is eager to please me as a customer.

Principle. It's not really charitable to deny someone a service like this.. - And it shouldn't be what the Christian faith is about... Aka. Getting upset over something materialistic.

To deny anyone, anything, based on Gender, Sexuality, Race or other attribute is discrimination... And is against good, fair, conscience in my eyes.

Mr Puggsly said:

Fuck the atheist bullshit, its about freedom in general and part of that is not being forced to something against their religion. Nobody had their safety or life was genuinely impacted by the refusal of a stupid cake, just a big waste of time.

The Bible doesn't make any mention of wedding cakes though.

In-fact, the Bible is against allot of things that Christians blatantly ignore out of convenience. - I mean, I would assume this baker doesn't screen all couples that are getting married to ensure they haven't gone through divorce at some point in their life to deny them a service, right? In short, it's hypocritical of them.

Freedom of Religion also has an implied right of Freedrom from Religion, by that point alone, the bakers should have kept their theistic view out of the cake making process for the couple.

Immersiveunreality said:
Jumpin said:

That's capitalism and free speech. The Christian bakery has the right to be cocks about their business, but when the world finds out about it then they're going to be treated like the dicks that they are.

If i was gay and they refused to make a cake i would prob been a bit upset but also understanding about the beliefs of that baker and just moved on, this is just pityfull  and dumb vengeance .

Well. That's the thing.
The beliefs of the baker is his beliefs alone, not the customers, they shouldn't be obligated to be upheld to their morals, however questionable it may be.

SpokenTruth said:

What the hell is a gay cake?

It's where you get two cakes of the same gender...

Or it's a cake covered in copious amounts of glitter and sequins.

Qwark said:

Not really they asked the Baker for a custom product. Not something which was already on the shelf/chart. He has every right to refuse that. He was not unwilling to sell anything to the couple because they where gay.

He refused to make a custom gay wedding cake, because it probably did not align with his views. If he denied service all together it would be a different story though. 

Which to be fair he has every right too, as the US supreme court judged. In the end it was a minor inconvienience for the gsy couple since the next Baker would probably bake that cake. 

I think if the same thing was to go through the general legal processes in most European countries, the Bakers would probably not be in a good position.
It is what it is I guess.

Immersiveunreality said:

It is not a justification but at least try to understand the fear for going against religion to some people and that does not mean they hate the gays.

That's their problem, not the Gay couples... And thus they shouldn't be subjected to their religious doctrine's "morality". (I use that term loosely.)




--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--