Faelco said:
If you look at different games, you'll see that 25-30% of players finishing the story is very good, most games don't have that much. So the game is really engaging enough.
And yes, shield draugr and heavy draugr are different. You actually want reskins, and it's not. You want monster who look different (reskin), while the game provides you monster who are from the same race but are very different gameplay wise. Seriously, you can't tell me that you did the entire trials without changing your attack style between the different ennemies. You have 100 enemies trials, and yet it will be very varied during the trials from one wave to the next.
You want them to invent 50 different races just to change their look, just to look different. What about WW2 games, do you complain that you only shoot humans? |
C'mon. We're talking about a AAA 10/10 game here. 25% for a 10/10? If you're giving such high marks you can't compare it to how other games do. If it's really 10/10, it should be finished by more people. C'mon. Stop being so forgiving yet giving it a perfect score.
And no, I don't need 50 types. But a dozen? For a 10/10 game? A dozen monster types? That's simply not good enough.
See, my point is that having these issues is specifically for this game because we're giving it high marks. High marks for everything so everything has to be high standard. Why forgive it then if some parts fall short? If this were a different game, you wouldn't forgive it too.