By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Official Nintendo E3 2018 Thread

 

How hyped are you for Nintendo's E3?

10 (Hype levels over 9000!) 28 20.14%
 
9 (Pretty Hyped) 21 15.11%
 
8 (Moderately Hyped) 27 19.42%
 
7 (Cautiously Hyped) 18 12.95%
 
6 (Not quite there yet) 10 7.19%
 
5 (Unsure) 3 2.16%
 
4 (Not Very) 7 5.04%
 
3 (Meh) 8 5.76%
 
2 (Not hyped) 7 5.04%
 
1 (NintenDOOOMED!) 10 7.19%
 
Total:139
Wyrdness said:
Free roaming Fire Emblem in full 3d, when adding the features of recent games as well this will be an interesting experience for a series that was due to be killed off not long ago.

New info about the game, if you are interested.

https://nintendoeverything.com/fire-emblem-three-houses-screenshots-fact-sheet/



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Around the Network
Nautilus said:
Wyrdness said:
Free roaming Fire Emblem in full 3d, when adding the features of recent games as well this will be an interesting experience for a series that was due to be killed off not long ago.

New info about the game, if you are interested.

https://nintendoeverything.com/fire-emblem-three-houses-screenshots-fact-sheet/

Thanks.



irstupid said:
LivingMetal said:
Just now starting to watch the Nintendo conference. I did miss the first hour. Like Sony, Nintendo is also using the interview format. But something about the way they're doing it it's so much more relaxed, classy and natural. So far I like what I see so we'll see what this goes.

This is not Nintendo's conference, this is there Treehouse, which they have been doing for a few years now.

Their conference is like their directs, just a video you can watch on their youtube page.

I do agree though, that Nintendo out of all the little Q&A sessions have the best. They feel like you said more natural, relaxed and like not scripted or something.

Ok...

"CONFERENCE"

Better? 



Hiku said:
Nautilus said:

Nice, now you are moving goalposts.I think I have made myself more than clear, and personal feelings aside, people will realize what type of game this is with the passing of time, wether it is by Nintendo announcing what other stuffs there are in their new game, or just by gamers finally getting their hands on the game itself come december.

What goalpost did I move? Did I not say from the start that my definition hinged on the fact that new Smash games have always been built on new engines, up until (seemingly) now?

I want you to answer that question, because it looks like you're throwing that in to make it appear as if you have a point. Like 'disagreeing' with me by giving Majora as an example, even though I clearly acknowledged games like that.
How was my goalpost moved when my definition from the start hinged on the game engine? Very curious about this one.

And I'd also like to hear what your definition of a new Smash is vs enhanced port, because you were very eager to disagree ,without presenting your own. As if you're just disagreeing for the sake of disagreeing.

The problem here is, its not up to you or me to define these things based on our tastes.I mean, we can have discussions and even have "unofficial" agreements rather something is really this or that, but what defines wether a game is a new entry or a port, or a remaster is what the company that made defines it as so.You or I may call BS if there is one to be called, but we are not the final word.You may have your own opinion about the merits of the game, but its your preference, not a fact or anything.Imagine if people thought that the 2016 Doom wasnt a real doom because they thought it didnt play like the old doom games and thus what shitshow it would be every time Doom was brought up in the forums?If you think something its not good or official or whatever, thats fine.More than fine really.But dont spread it as it were the truth.

As for me, I define a new game as a new game when it delivers an experience that is different enough from the source material that it is based on.From what i have seen already, the graphics/gameplay/items/characters seem and look different enough to call it a new game(talking about smash).I could care less about what engine it is running and how much asset it is borrowing as long as the experience feels new.And mind you, we dont even know what new modes it will have, how deep or how much content the single player will have, what other newcomers will come, etc.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Nintendo completely wrecks competition with SSBU. That's a huge reveal before release. Switch & SSBU will be sold out for Xmas.



Around the Network
Hiku said:
irstupid said:

Just ignore him and others and move on. Don't get into the endless argument like people do about whether the Switch is a console or a handheld.

Smash is a new game, the Switch is a hybrid. End of story.

But you will never convince those that want to say otherwise. 

Asking him to present his definition = my fault when he doesn't give it?

But it's nice that you're blaming me when it's only him who's refusing to present his definition of why he disagrees, and throws in that "it's not fact" when at no point did I insinuate that it was. And now he threw in "you moved the goalpost" without explaining how, because I never did.

Just because you agree with someone's bottom line doesn't mean you should back up their behavior, and attack the other.
All I asked for was his own definition. That's not too much to ask for. And instead I got anything but that.

Hold on to your butt before going after me, I cant type that fast.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

RolStoppable said:
Nautilus said:

New info about the game, if you are interested.

https://nintendoeverything.com/fire-emblem-three-houses-screenshots-fact-sheet/

Thankfully, it doesn't read like there will be much free-roaming.

Seems like to be contained to your hub(base?) and/or specific areas.I really hope that dungeons come to this game.While I never played echoes, I really liked that idea.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

RolStoppable said:
Nautilus said:

Seems like to be contained to your hub(base?) and/or specific areas.I really hope that dungeons come to this game.While I never played echoes, I really liked that idea.

I hope that there won't be dungeons. The only way dungeons would be acceptable is that all enemy encounters are non-repeatable. Echoes sucked because it constantly had encounters that netted almost no experience, so the game wasted a lot of the player's time for absolutely nothing. Granted, a big part of Echoes' suckiness was the broken EXP/promotion system, so it wasn't due to the dungeon mechanic alone that it all fell flat on its face.

Well, thats easily fixable.I dont know, I think the dungeons adds a nice aspect to the franchise.Then again, I do really love dungeons.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Screenshots of most if not all games Nintendo is showcasing

https://www.flickr.com/photos/25792657@N00/sets/72157670051600008



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Nautilus said:
Lonely_Dolphin said:
Every new Smash has substantial amounts of new content. So far I'm not seeing that, what I'm seeing is what I initially thought the game would be, enhanced port combining all the content from 3DS/Wii U with a few new characters stages, though they've also extended that to all the previous games. The underwhelming low key way they revealed the game compared to past Smash reveals really says it all.

No it dosent, since they havent talked nothing about modes, single player, full roster and so on.You are just jumping the gun.

And I mean, the game was revealed back in March, and it was pretty epic.We KNEW the game was going to be at E3.I really dont know what you are talking about

So far I said. Obviously we can only go off of what is known. However I'd think if they actually had a lot of new content they'd show it instead of spending so much time on small little details. The March direct was a tease not a reveal.