By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Solo Headed To Become A Flop? Yep, It Flopped.

 

How Much Will Solo Make WW?

Under $700M 56 60.87%
 
$700M-$800M 18 19.57%
 
$801M-$900M 12 13.04%
 
$901M-$1B 3 3.26%
 
Over $1B 3 3.26%
 
Total:92

In fact, SJWs are worse than bigots in my opinion.



Around the Network
Maxosaurus-rex said:
Insidb said:

People have been calling out inequality and social injustice, which naturally ruffled the feathers of those with opposing points of view.

Labeling them anything doe not demonize them: it's just a label designed to demonize. It's also a very idiotic label, because it casts the labeler in a most insidious light.

In essence, those who use the label to vilify have to own a discontent with social justice and those who fight for it, whether those fighters are well-reasoned or irrational.

There's a big difference between fighting social injustice and being whiny and intolerable 

Agreed.



Insidb said:
Immersiveunreality said:

Using the term SJW as a way to represent doing good things does give a bad image cause its not a term you guys came up with yourself, it started as an insult to paint those that used extreme measures and weaponnized social justice and thats why the warrior part is included.

So ofcourse when the sole existence of that term was dependent on extremism it gets very understandable why people see it in a bad light.

People have been calling out inequality and social injustice, which naturally ruffled the feathers of those with opposing points of view.

Labeling them anything doe not demonize them: it's just a label designed to demonize. It's also a very idiotic label, because it casts the labeler in a most insidious light.

In essence, those who use the label to vilify have to own a discontent with social justice and those who fight for it, whether those fighters are well-reasoned or irrational.

You do not really seem to get it.

I think most people love the real social justice i personally have not come across a single person that dislikes it, but using social justice as a weapon/lie to make others look bad is sickening and that is totally different than normal social justice so do not put those terms int he same box.

It originated out of extremism and it is mostly dishonest.



Immersiveunreality said:
Insidb said:

People have been calling out inequality and social injustice, which naturally ruffled the feathers of those with opposing points of view.

Labeling them anything doe not demonize them: it's just a label designed to demonize. It's also a very idiotic label, because it casts the labeler in a most insidious light.

In essence, those who use the label to vilify have to own a discontent with social justice and those who fight for it, whether those fighters are well-reasoned or irrational.

You do not really seem to get it.

I think most people love the real social justice i personally have not come across a single person that dislikes it, but using social justice as a weapon/lie to make others look bad is sickening and that is totally different than normal social justice so do not put those terms int he same box.

It originated out of extremism and it is mostly dishonest.

Exactly. There's things any reasonable human can agree are bad. SJWs will find the slightest offensive thing and go to the extreme with it and if you don't agree with them they immediately label you a bigot. They are hypocrites.

 

Don't find the nasally and whiney Melissa Mccarthy funny? You're a sexist! 



Well at least its not the biggest Disney bomb Ron Howard is attached to he was originally set to direct The Alamo (2004) but instead is just one of the movies producers and that movie could have been a much bigger bomb then it ended up being because Howard originally wanted to movie to have a $200 million dollar budget but it ended up being shot with a $107 million dollar budget and only grossed $25.8 million world wide.



Around the Network
Insidb said:
Azuren said:

If I have to explain how SJWs are garbage and ruin everything they touch to you, then you're honestly too far gone. But to sum it up:

 

No one likes being told how to do something so as not to offend a small minority who may or may not be offended.

No one likes being told to check their privilege.

No one likes safe spaces or thinks they should be in use on college grounds.

No one wants to learn a bunch of made up pronouns just so someone else can feel validated in their life choices.

No one wants ideology creamed corn their throats when they try to watch a movie or TV show.

And finally, no one likes the pretentious snowflakes who fell the need to validate themselves by virtue signaling at every opportunity presented to them.

 

You want assholes? Go to the far sides of the political spectrum: left or right. On the right, you have bigoted rednecks who are members of the KKK. And on the left, you have bigoted hipster SJWs who are members of Antifa (which ironically and hilariously employs fascist techniques).

This is probably the snowflakiest thing I've read in ages: why are you always so offended by everything that most people aren't, even when it's a nonexistent thing?

Pansexuality literally NEVER comes up in Solo, yet we have a host of very aggressive anti-SJW people manufacturing a narrative. How are you not embarrassed? Did you see the movie? If you had, you'd know you are factually incorrect, and all these takes on Lando are absurd.

Your "no one" mantra sounds very much like something that echoes out of the far right chamber, and your willingness to fabricate an argument to forward agenda is quite disturbing. Go see the movie, before you comment again on this thread: you and your cohorts are patently misleading other members.

People shouldn't be upset that Lando is a pansexual he is a freaking fictional character.  Plus the signs where always there the dude wears a cape.



Carl said:
Azuren said:

If I have to explain how SJWs are garbage and ruin everything they touch to you, then you're honestly too far gone. But to sum it up:

No one likes being told how to do something so as not to offend a small minority who may or may not be offended.

No one likes being told to check their privilege.

No one likes safe spaces or thinks they should be in use on college grounds.

No one wants to learn a bunch of made up pronouns just so someone else can feel validated in their life choices.

No one wants ideology creamed corn their throats when they try to watch a movie or TV show.

And finally, no one likes the pretentious snowflakes who fell the need to validate themselves by virtue signaling at every opportunity presented to them.

You want assholes? Go to the far sides of the political spectrum: left or right. On the right, you have bigoted rednecks who are members of the KKK. And on the left, you have bigoted hipster SJWs who are members of Antifa (which ironically and hilariously employs fascist techniques).

All this because of Star Wars.

All of these reasons are why SJWs are garbage, this isn't in direct relation to Soylo: A Soy Wars Soyry.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

I don't know who here read the book, but we're just living Fahrenheit 451 nowadays. You know, the "books are banished and burned, all knowledge is prohibited" story.

You know how this distopya happened in the book? SJWs. They explain that slowly, small groups of people became offended by everything. It started with jokes or comedy, something small, and it became normal to banish more and more "offensive" stuff to please the minority so they finally managed to banish science, and people stay all day in front of a terrible official reality show making sure that they're unable to think by themselves. And scientists or anyone thinking too much or too freely live in slums in rural areas to escape the government.

People are always worried about 1984 and Big Brother, but our awesome SJWs are doing a great job to create a "destroyed civilization" scenario. Why wouldn't we love them? Books and science are awful of course... 

Last edited by Faelco - on 27 May 2018

Insidb said:
Azuren said:

If I have to explain how SJWs are garbage and ruin everything they touch to you, then you're honestly too far gone. But to sum it up:

 

No one likes being told how to do something so as not to offend a small minority who may or may not be offended.

No one likes being told to check their privilege.

No one likes safe spaces or thinks they should be in use on college grounds.

No one wants to learn a bunch of made up pronouns just so someone else can feel validated in their life choices.

No one wants ideology creamed corn their throats when they try to watch a movie or TV show.

And finally, no one likes the pretentious snowflakes who fell the need to validate themselves by virtue signaling at every opportunity presented to them.

 

You want assholes? Go to the far sides of the political spectrum: left or right. On the right, you have bigoted rednecks who are members of the KKK. And on the left, you have bigoted hipster SJWs who are members of Antifa (which ironically and hilariously employs fascist techniques).

This is probably the snowflakiest thing I've read in ages: why are you always so offended by everything that most people aren't, even when it's a nonexistent thing?

Pansexuality literally NEVER comes up in Solo, yet we have a host of very aggressive anti-SJW people manufacturing a narrative. How are you not embarrassed? Did you see the movie? If you had, you'd know you are factually incorrect, and all these takes on Lando are absurd.

Your "no one" mantra sounds very much like something that echoes out of the far right chamber, and your willingness to fabricate an argument to forward agenda is quite disturbing. Go see the movie, before you comment again on this thread: you and your cohorts are patently misleading other members.

Oh dear god, where to begin? First, maybe address your cognitive dissonance. 

 

Snowflakiest? In what way? I dislike a movie and am glad it is performing significantly below expectations. Maybe you should look up what a snowflake is? I dunno, it just seems like you're using a word you heard that upset you with the expectation of it inflicting hurt on others. The catch here is this is a word that refers mainly to Tumblrites, SJWs, and Neo Marxists in general. It's moreso humorous that you try to use this word than it is hurtful.

Yeah, it doesn't. So why was it brought up? What was the point? Why? Oh yeah: because this movie and the other Star Wars films since Disney's acquisition have been consistently pushing an ideology, not a plot. And that's not even the bulk of the reasons people would have to hate this movie. I mean, how are you not embarrassed to be defending a movie made by people who actively and publicly mock and ridicule its fans when they are given criticism for forcing an ideology? How embarrassed are you to know that, even if this movie had no signs of SJW influence in it, it would still be the target of a boycott based on the aforementioned treatment? I'd suppose little, since you seem okay with defending something as debase as an SJW.

I'd argue it sounds more like a "far-anything" echo chamber, of one I sure you're apart of if you're willingly to stoop as low as defending SJWs. I would assume it's how you're so adept at spotting it, just not very good at calling it out for what it is (after all, you did start the same post with why are you always so offended by everything that most people aren't, even when it's a nonexistent thing?). As far as misleading members? How so? Did I lie about anything? D you care to back that up, or are you just going to slander me and my "cohorts"? 

 

Honestly, the simple incorrect usage of the "snowflakiest" thing is enough to laugh this argument out, but your in-post hypocrisy and complete lack of understanding on why so many people are boycotting this film sure do help. 



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Faelco said:

I don't know who here read the book, but we're just living Fahrenheit 451 nowadays. You know, the "books are banished and burned, all knowledge is prohibited" story.

You know how this distopya happened in the book? SJWs. They explain that slowly, small groups of people became offended by everything. It started with jokes or comedy, something small, and it became normal to banish more and more "offensive" stuff to please the minority so they finally managed to banish science, and people stay all day in front of a terrible official reality show making sure that they're unable to think by themselves.

People are always worried about 1984 and Big Brother, but our awesome SJWs are doing a great job to create a "destroyed civilization" scenario. Why wouldn't we love them? Books and science are awful of course... 

I find it absolutely hilarious that SJWs try to use Orwell in their own arguments when they are the god damn thought police.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames