By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Dr. Shawn Baker challenges vegan jihadis, eats only meat for 15 months. Think he's unhealthy? Here's what happened...

palou said:
Farsala said:

Stuff has already been said. But lets continue with Protein. What are easy sources of protein in plant sources?

And by Protein I mean:

Histidine

Isoleucine

Leucine

Lysine

Methionine

Phenylalanine

Threonine

Tryptophan

Valine

Arginine

Cysteine

Glutamine

Glycine

Proline

Tyrosine

 

I genuinely would like to know. I am sure they can be found, but easily? I don't think so.

I'll do a couple, bottom up -

Tyrosine, usually biosynthesized, from substances abundantly found in soy.

Proline - whole cabbage family works just fine.

Glycine - none-essential, as it can be synthesized from basic elements.

Glutamine - non-essential.

Cysteine - common, synthesized under normal conditions, otherwise.

Arginine - Beans, nuts, etc..

 

Again, the human body is very good at creating what it needs, most of those can be produced, and are produced under normal circumstances by the metabolism to fit needs.

 

What concerns proteins alone, Soybeans, Quinoa, Chia, Buckwheat, and a couple others contain sufficient amounts of the *essential* amino acids that they are, by themselves, enough to fill the needs, if eaten as sole protein source.

Heh starting from the bottom was a mistake because those were the non essential proteins or conditionally essential.

The essential proteins are more important, because the body can't naturally make it. If you could list easily accessible foods for the essentials, then maybe it would be possible.

Soybeans are great and have all essential amino acids in tofu and stuff but they are not all equal proteins. For example they are low in Methionine and Cystine which, unless you eat excessive amounts, you won't get it from soybeans alone. Quinoa is much worse on protein side, so I don't really consider it so viable. Chia same story as Soybeans. Buckwheat same as Quinoa. So while possible, is not feasible in my opinion.

T bone steak, chicken, turkey heck even fish only needs a small serving to solve all your protein needs for an average person. The problem is compounded for people with a larger need for protein.



Around the Network
Farsala said:
palou said:

I'll do a couple, bottom up -

Tyrosine, usually biosynthesized, from substances abundantly found in soy.

Proline - whole cabbage family works just fine.

Glycine - none-essential, as it can be synthesized from basic elements.

Glutamine - non-essential.

Cysteine - common, synthesized under normal conditions, otherwise.

Arginine - Beans, nuts, etc..

 

Again, the human body is very good at creating what it needs, most of those can be produced, and are produced under normal circumstances by the metabolism to fit needs.

 

What concerns proteins alone, Soybeans, Quinoa, Chia, Buckwheat, and a couple others contain sufficient amounts of the *essential* amino acids that they are, by themselves, enough to fill the needs, if eaten as sole protein source.

Heh starting from the bottom was a mistake because those were the non essential proteins or conditionally essential.

The essential proteins are more important, because the body can't naturally make it. If you could list easily accessible foods for the essentials, then maybe it would be possible.

Soybeans are great and have all essential amino acids in tofu and stuff but they are not all equal proteins. For example they are low in Methionine and Cystine which, unless you eat excessive amounts, you won't get it from soybeans alone. Quinoa is much worse on protein side, so I don't really consider it so viable. Chia same story as Soybeans. Buckwheat same as Quinoa. So while possible, is not feasible in my opinion.

T bone steak, chicken, turkey heck even fish only needs a small serving to solve all your protein needs for an average person. The problem is compounded for people with a larger need for protein.

Looking it up, apparently certain essentials are considered complementary, apparently, so only containing one or the other is sufficient to let it be considered "complementary."

Those 2 can be found in other food without too much of a stretch, however, methionine in nuts/grasses (wheat, etc...) and cystine in the cabbage family.

 

As stated, it's of course much easier for a vegetarian to fill these dietary needs (eggs have just about everything and then some...), so that's probably what should be recommended, from a nutritional perspective.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.

Who in their right mind would be dumb enough to only eat meat. Even most animals that are carnivores don't eat meat once in a while.



palou said:
Farsala said:

Heh starting from the bottom was a mistake because those were the non essential proteins or conditionally essential.

The essential proteins are more important, because the body can't naturally make it. If you could list easily accessible foods for the essentials, then maybe it would be possible.

Soybeans are great and have all essential amino acids in tofu and stuff but they are not all equal proteins. For example they are low in Methionine and Cystine which, unless you eat excessive amounts, you won't get it from soybeans alone. Quinoa is much worse on protein side, so I don't really consider it so viable. Chia same story as Soybeans. Buckwheat same as Quinoa. So while possible, is not feasible in my opinion.

T bone steak, chicken, turkey heck even fish only needs a small serving to solve all your protein needs for an average person. The problem is compounded for people with a larger need for protein.

Looking it up, apparently certain essentials are considered complementary, apparently, so only containing one or the other is sufficient to let it be considered "complementary."

Those 2 can be found in other food without too much of a stretch, however, methionine in nuts/grasses (wheat, etc...) and cystine in the cabbage family.

 

As stated, it's of course much easier for a vegetarian to fill these dietary needs (eggs have just about everything and then some...), so that's probably what should be recommended, from a nutritional perspective.

Yes that is why I had them together. (See bold)

I don't really consider eggs vegetarian as it is honorary meat imo.. but whatever. Eggs and meat are the common protein foods.

Red cabbage doesn't really have any protein. 1 serving of T bone steak, eggs (300 calories) or other meats solve all methionine or cystine needs for the average person. But Red Cabbage you would need to eat 5 entire red cabbages or 1300 calories which nobody does , soybeans much better choice but still not great.

On the wiki for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methionine

Brazil nuts are high, but who really has any of them? I genuinely would love to add them to my diet and replace some of my meat but that would be quite frankly impossible. The others indeed also have some, just not much as usual similar to the case with soybeans.



John2290 said:
palou said:

hmm... 

 

While *most* cultures have had meat in their diet, I'd like to point out that for the last couple thousand of years, minus the last hundred fifty or so, that portion was a *very* small proportion of the plate, for the vast majority of the population - simply due to logistic facts of an earlier agricultural society. The poor (and with that, I mean, 90 + % of the population, in medieval times and earlier) almost exclusively fed off of whatever regional starch crop could be grown the most efficiently in that area of the world, be it rice, wheat, corn, etc... Mind you, they had the joy of engaging in continuous heavy physical labour, as well. Which demonstrates the fact that the "omnivore" trait of humans is the *capability* of surviving off of anything, rather than the *necessity*. We are extremely flexible, our bodies have with only very few exceptions the capabilities of synthesizing the necessary out of just about anything.

 

I don't know where you are getting the male-specific thing from? To my knowledge, these types of deficiencies appear more quickly within women (due to the constant loss of essential material from menstruation.) Sexual hormones which distinguish female/male otherwise are generally synthesized by the body, not consumed. Which makes sense, since they are extremely specific from species to species.


I mean, of course you anyone can live off of a vegan diet if they wanted to, in the modern day. Nutrition isn't voodoo magic, we know what each meal is composed of, and if you really want to, the exact nutritional properties of meat can be recreated with no trouble at all from non-animal products (GMOs, etc.. can make that even easier). What's "natural" really shouldn't come into play when we have access to more extensive knowledge. What actually gets absorbed by the body, after all the digestion are some pretty simple molecules we'd have no issues synthesizing in a lab to perfection, if you're really picky about it.

Who is fitting the bill here? Do you want to pay? Do you want to personally manage the diet of people who barely have enough time to fart let alone keep their energy levels up and their body in top shape. If you think a vegan diet doesn't take significant time and can't be adopted by the VAST majority of people for time, health and managing their health without without getting sick because of it then you're kidding yourself. I've seen people go Vegan, have to devote more time and money to thier diet every passing week and still end up looking like they were on drugs, both a man and two women. None could keep it up and all had to return to either meat or fish and diary products and look a damn sight better for it. 

There is a reason you only see vloggers and celebrity vegans or rich kids who look healthy and are living on a Vegan diet with little health effects. Time and money and even with some people that still isn't enough, thier bodies reject Veganism the same as it would if they ate straight meat. Why is it so hard for people to just accept we are omnivorous and we have inherited the world and our higher level of intelligence because of a diverse diet of meat, fruit and veg.

Even if everyone in the world went vegan and we managed to straighten out the ill effects, which isn't posdible as you say it is unless you're a time traveller, it would be screwing future generations out of forward evolution and at the very least cause mental illness, regressive gene traits and as I said cause a quick devolution for the human race. 

Respect the animals that die to keep your health and mind up to the pinnacle it can be, don't waste either and make the most of what you're given. No need to slowly starve yourself or make life difficult, just source your meat. Become a free range farmer. Anything but a vegan mess of mood swings and violences in the hope to make the world a better place yet spreading nothing but a volatile in the short term. 

 

 

...as you can tell, this is a subject close to my heart. Lmao.

free range  mmfarming us just aabuzzword as a small door to the outside with a really small space can be called free range 



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Around the Network
Helloplite said:

Vegan "jihadis"? Do you have any contextual understanding of what "jihadi" even means?

The topic title is offensive.

Actually jihad means to struggle or strive so jihadis are strivers or strugglers so vegan jihadis is terribly appropriate. It doesn't;t matter what you think the word means it matters what the actual word means so don't even try to bullshit me



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also