I'ts not ignoring the danger, its about not giving into hysteria that always happens around events like this.

You guys do know the cold war right? It won't happen but the main concern is what will happen to Syria. I just think it's talk.

The new wars of the future are a mix between a influence (soft power)/ trade war.
It's to expensive to blow sh*t up these days .

At the moment Russia is really attacking US with buying gold and pushing out the Petro-dollar.

Lol did i, that so funny because non of my videos talk about the possibilities of war. In fact it's shows what if both country when to war, how each country engaged each other and utilize their strategy . It's also predict the outcome of war. 

You need to relax my friend. 

Agree on trade war, but Russia are  not in trade war with US. Also it doesn't matter if it's expensive or not there is always reason to blow something , especially how Trump raise Military budget like crazy. we are into something. 

nah its fine

Yes, i wasn't to clear. Let me correct that: It's to expensive to blow rich people's sh*t up these days .

The Military industrial complex of the US loves to blow up poor targers. But it will hardly ever attach someone like Russia because they would expect a real fight back.

The US Army is all about keeping the dollars flowing to and from the MIC. Their fight is one of fighting back budget cuts .

Yup, the funny thing is actually both country are not competing in global domination , but they are competing  each other on selling weapon. Just look hows smart Erdogan in Turkey. Buying S400 from Russia and have Nuclear Power plant deal with Russia while maintaining status as NATO. .

i hope the situation will calm down...

To OP: No, a nuclear war is not likely at all. It didn't happen throughout the Cold War, so what makes it so likely that it will now? Do you think Putin and Russia are prepared for a nuclear war? Do you think USA is? Do you think anyone actually contemplates such a prospect? 

Facts: Nuclear weapons exist solely for the reason of averting a nuclear war. This concept is called deterrence, and in various forms the theory has held up correctly, through both the two nuclear ages.

Facts: Tannenwald has put forward the academic theory that nuclear weapons have now become a taboo. If you find this unlikely, maybe you can listen to Paul, who argues that nuclear weapons have now become status symbols, and are not obtained to be used in a war.

Facts: Deterrence works particularly well when you have two large powers like USA and Russia. The vast numbers of nuclear weapons means that any attack faces a retaliatory attack that would mean the end of both countries. This 'second strike' capability, which is ensured by both Russia and USA, means that it is in no one's interests to initiate a nuclear war.

Facts: Nuclear weapons minimize the risk of all out war between major superpowers. They are the reason we went from two world wars and numerous wars involving great powers before 1945, to no wars between major powers since. Instead we have witnessed the rise of proxy wars (during the Cold War), and the increase in civil wars (including Syria). There is no interest for a war between Russia and USA. The only ones who are going to suffer are going to be places like Syria, Libya, and other places where these great powers 'intervene'. A nuclear war is as likely as a fly catching fire and causing a wildfire.