| fauzman said: Wow. That is a very impressive score. I was planning to get this game later but i am now very tempted to buy it now. |
I recommend. amazeballs
BraLoD said:
It was even part of my LoD movement thread back in the day. And I'm not one of those guys that keep making fakes to upvote/downvote games on MC. |
Will have to take your word on it =p
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Hey, what ever happened with that Xbox personality who claimed he would get a PS4 and GoW if the game got a 95?? He changed his claim a few times, but the last thing I heard he said was that he would officially do it if it stayed at 95 by release.
| pitzy272 said: Hey, what ever happened with that Xbox personality who claimed he would get a PS4 and GoW if the game got a 95?? He changed his claim a few times, but the last thing I heard he said was that he would officially do it if it stayed at 95 by release. |
He's a Nintendo fanboy. And he's pretty much ignoring everything about it right now and is pretending he never said anything about such claims.
| BraLoD said: It barely survived EDGE score in the 95 Now is wait for Gamecritics... I think the game still can get 4 more perfect scores, hope it's enough. EDGE sure weights a lot. |
Why should EDGE weigh more than other publications?
Errorist76 said:
Why should EDGE weigh more than other publications? |
Some publications are weighted more on metacritics, just because.
Hynad said:
Some publications are weighted more on metacritics, just because. |
If that's true that's ridiculous and will make me stop visiting that site.
Errorist76 said:
If that's true that's ridiculous and will make me stop visiting that site. |
It makes more sense that a big publications score will matter more than bob down the street with his hobbyist blog. Without access to how much different reviewers are weighted compared to others I can't really judge.
John2290 said:
No, there should be parity among all reviewers. The only weighing that should be done is the reviewers who get to publish reviews, they should all be equal or the whole reason for metacritcs existence is pointless. If they approve a site/magazine to be able to post a score, it should matter whether they are a one person blogger or a site as big as IGN. |
Exactly, if the weighting system is in accordance with the quality of each publication then why not just exclude scores from run-of-the-mill sites and bloggers instead of creating an arbitrarily defined weighting system.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
