David Hoggs personal vendetta is... | |||
| Justified. I support it. | 44 | 57.89% | |
| Unjustified. I don't support it. | 26 | 34.21% | |
| I'm unsure. | 1 | 1.32% | |
| Other, comments... | 5 | 6.58% | |
| Total: | 76 | ||
| Ganoncrotch said: clearly history was one of the subjects he failed at if he posed for this picture... it's about 30 seconds in paint away from being Hitler. |
.jpg)
Or we could just stop pretending like a pose looking similar to another pose proves some kind of point ... especially when raising your hand is the only real similarity and it's pretty common in political discussion.
Azuren said:
And he hit her financially, a place she seems to be unable to hit him. "Punching up" doesn't mean anything when there are real world ramifications outside of muh feelz.
Andthere's plenty of reason to make fun of him, along with most hard leftists. They exert so much control over everyone... I'd love to see a normal company look them in the eye and tell them to grow up. |
Arby's seem to have done so already... Also, they remind me of Archie's, but those are two different companies...
| Signalstar said: Here is another one for you. Frank Stallone, brother of Sylvester Stallone commenting on Hogg: "This David Hogg pussy is getting a little big for his britches. I'm sure someone from his age group is dying to sucker punch this rich little bitch,” Stallone wrote in his original Tweet, which has since been deleted. “Watch him run home like the coward he is. He's the worst rep for today's youth headline grabbing punk." Frank Stallone then apologized: “To everyone and to David Hogg especially. I want to deeply apologize for my irresponsible words. I would never in a million years wish or promote violence to anyone anywhere on this planet,” he Tweeted on Easter Sunday. “After what these kids went though I’m deeply ashamed. Please accept my apology. Frank” I do not understand how anyone can defend these people attack Hogg. So many people are attacking these Parkland kids for the wrong reasons. Any criticism that doesn't go against the points they are arguing is off base and uncalled for. Saying that they are young and therefore no one should listen to them, wishing violence on them, calling them nazis, and saying they are bought and paid for just shows you do not have an articulate way to counter their arguments. |
David has no high horse to sit on since he opened the door to it. He's called people child killers that want more money that disagree with him on gun control.
Good to see justice being served
| TranceformerFX said: David Hogg is just a kid that CNN is using for their political bias. Problem is that he's so caught up the "if you don't agree with me then you're letting children get murdered" rhetoric that it's starting to ripple into other facets of his life - like this college application for example. He's CNN's tool, and their using his naivety and un-independant thinking to their advantage. |
Most politician are like that. Trump is a particular case in point. In the UK, Nigel Farage and Alec Salmond label anything that doesn't adhere to their vision as fearmongering.
Its a way of showing how powerful how large and strong your base is. Also, you could use the same argument to say Trump is a Fox News tool, seeing as he seems to get much of his policy from their shows, and their exploiting him for their own bias.
| ResilientFighter said: Also for the guy that posted this, geralt would be a liberal or progressive if he was a real person. |
you mean despite him believing in self defense?
him saving the damsels in distress instead of promoting gender equality?
him obviously being an archetype for men? a concept which progressives and liberals are actively trying to destroy?
actually how about this, what liberal values do you imagine geralt would have? i actually can't think of any and that's the thing with games they generally do the opposite of pushing weakness and mediocrity
| John2290 said: Ben shapiro is such a clear thinker, he not only makes great points that are fair and not based in emotion, it's incredible how he can seperate his emotion to keep fact and clear points at the forefront of the discussion. This man should be applauded for what he does. He completely made all of my thoughts on this matter and manifested them in such a clearer manner than I have been able to muster.
Not only that but he is also very entertaining and witty on the spot in his public speaking, glad I didn't write this guy off as a far right wing nutter, almost did.. He's not even close to that. What an incredible thinker andfair debater, doing this daily.
|
A guy who believes in magical creatures (religion) is hardly the standard-bearer for separating emotion and argument. He also seem to be very irrational in regards to the whole gun argument and way to apologetic when it comes to Trump.
Puppyroach said:
A guy who believes in magical creatures (religion) is hardly the standard-bearer for separating emotion and argument. He also seem to be very irrational in regards to the whole gun argument and way to apologetic when it comes to Trump. |
Straw-manning anyone who believes in religion as someone who is incapable of separating their emotions from arguments is inherently an irrational stance to take. "Person X has religious views Y, therefore he is incapable of separating emotion from reason on all issues" is a logically fallacious argument. If you're going to dismiss people and their arguments based solely on their religious beliefs instead of the merits/flaws of their argument, you're not really in a position to be delineating who is and isn't a paradigm of rationality.
An issue is raised.
A debate occurs.
One side of the debate side steps debate in favor of personal attacks. Discourse descends as it becomes about personalities and greater aspects of political tribalism. The issue is successfully ignored as energy is burned out fighting general feelings rather than precise policy positions. No one grows, ideological entrenchment proceeds, echo chambers are reinforced, nothing happens, status quo is victorious.
A bully?
Hahahaha, wont someone please think of those poor Fox News anchors.
She decided to attack the survivor of a terrorist attack just because that survivor is pushing for gun control. Fuck her, fuck Fox News.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
