By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Half A Billion Fewer Animals Are Being Killed Every Year Since 2007 As People Eat Less Meat

scrapking said:

Medisti said:

Kevin Smith is a morbidly obese man who has been overweight and has a famously terrible diet of fried chicken, so that's a rather extreme example, not to mention both his parents have a history of similar heart problems and he still didn't believe his doctors when they told him he had a 100% blockage. I doubt there were no symptoms. He's lived his entire life in denial.

Regardless, his problem was through excess. To suggest every person who has meat in their diet is going to die of a heart attack is absurd. Maybe if meat is 90% of their diet or all they eat is fried foods.

You're right, it would be silly to suggest everyone who eats meat is going to die of a heart attack.  I'm glad I didn't suggest it.  Since neither you nor I suggested it, it doesn't appear to be relevant to the discussion.

I merely said, and the evidence bears this out, that eating meat makes you more likely to get a heart attack, or suffer a stroke, or get diabetes, or get cancer.  I'd add to that the fact that the evidence suggests people who eat meat/dairy/eggs get more neurological conditions (many cases of "Alzheimers" are being re-diagnosed as cholesterol plaque building up in the brain).  We also have now demonstrated that lots of erectile dysfunction is cholesterol plaque building up in the penile artery.

As for Kevin Smith, he had recently started to take his health more seriously and had lost 85 pounds prior to the heart attack.  But sure, let's set him aside, and look at the Adventist and Adventist II studies.  These compared healthy omnivores, vs. healthy vegetarians, vs. healthy vegans.  The participants in the Adventist studies tend to be healthy and active and tend towards eating whole foods.  In these studies, the healthy vegans had the lowest rates of disease, and the least serious diseases.

Just wanted you to know, man. I stopped and had a burger in your honor earlier. Tasty cow. It told me your are solely responsible, too. For murdering the cow. The tasty, dead cow.



Around the Network
black8jac said:
Farsala said:
Does that mean half a billion animals fewer are being born too? After all no need for them to the industry.

Exactly. We do not hunt for cows, pigs, chickens or sheep, we breed them for meat.

The point is - people eat less meat therefore are healthier.

woah that leap.

Not only is it completely wrong to assume this based on the OP as was pointed out by many posts it has cherry picked certain numbers and left out numbers such as how cows are almost 20% larger now than they were a decade ago per cow i.e. a 1m killed 10 years ago and 800k killed today would yield the same amount of meat, not also including the advancements in whipping meat off the bones and new techniques of grinding up the eyes and such into hotdogs and meatballs more efficiently.

But you say that people are healthy? if you mean on a global scale you can't even begin to believe this to be true? Human race has never been more unhealthy and you'll find that sugary drinks and cakes rarely contain a lot of meat (sadly)



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Bristow9091 said:
Medisti said:

Just wanted you to know, man. I stopped and had a burger in your honor earlier. Tasty cow. It told me your are solely responsible, too. For murdering the cow. The tasty, dead cow.

Fuck sake, I read this and now I REALLY want a burger or two... think I know what I'm having for dinner! :P

We should all strive to be like the true hero of the people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Gorske



Kaneman! said:

How do you live? I can only survive on 75% carbs.

I eat mostly fats and the required amount of proteins. Then a little % of carbs that comes exclusively from veggies. Broccoli, cabbage, salad, tomatoes and leafy greens in general. It's not really necessary to do this to stay healthy, I just started doing it because I was curious (it's called ketogenic diet btw) and it's working very well for me, so I'm sticking with it. Switching from carbs to fats is not so hard. Fats have more calories than anything else and really fill your stomach since they have a high satiating power, so getting to your needed 2000Kcals or so is very easy. But still, you can have your carbs if you want. Just try to eat non-refined carbs. Those are very unhealthy and the main cause of several deseases linked to hormonal disfunctions (like diabetes...). White bread, refined sugar, white pasta and pizza...those are all bad for your body. Try to switch to whole grain stuff. 

However, when I said that the combination of fats and carbs is unhealthy I meant that eating them together in a single meal is not a good idea. Of course the worst thing you can do to your body would be eating fat heavy sweets. Fats+sugar is simply toxic. This has been known for a while now. Clearly, this doesn't mean you can't touch that stuff ever again. But you should be cautious about what you put in your body at least.

Oh, and by the way fruits are fine because they contain a lot of vitamins and minerals, so even if they have some sugar it's no big deal. 

Last edited by last92 - on 01 March 2018

Meat free since mid last year. So I did my small part.



Around the Network
scrapking said:

last92 said: 

I more or less agree with your point on dairy products, even though that has probably to do a lot with how dairy cattle is raised and how the milk itself is processed to produce cheese and other diary products. But be careful when you include "fats" in the "bad foods" category. If you know what you're doing, you can eat a lot of fats and still be healthy and lean...assuming you eat the "right" fats and a lot of veggies. Fats are not bad per se, this is a myth born from old (and totally wrong) beliefs that have been debunked by recent research. Sometimes, this misinformation is due to commercial reasons...like low-cholesterol foods, low fat food and so on. Ironically, you forgot to mention the one thing that probably caused the surge of nutrition-based diseases in the last century: (refined) carbs.

What is really damaging for the body is the combination of carbs and fats...and I'm pretty much convinced by now that sugar is a poison, plain and simple. I do everything I can not to ever touch it. There's just too much evidence about that.

I agree with almost everything you say here, with one asterisk:  when it comes to sugar, it's only refined sugar that is a poison.  You can eat fruit salads three meals a day and not get fat, not get diabetes, etc.  If you eat sugar in its natural, absolutely unrefined form, with plenty of fibre to slow the absorption, you'll do just fine.  The human populations that eat the most fruit have some of the lowest rates of diabetes, cancer, obesity, etc.

The research about refined carbohydrates has convinced me that flours and refined sugars are a poison and I avoid them.  However, I also avoid refined fats (olive oil, etc.) as I'm equally convinced those are problematic.  And the World Health Organization has confirmed that all meat probably causes cancer, and that processed meats (any meat that is smoked, cured, grilled, or processed in any way) definitely causes cancer.  So I agree with you that refined carbohydrates are a problem, but the research is that bad fats are the predominant cause of diabetes and that consumption of animal protein is tightly correlated to many cancers, so the preponderance of the best and most independent research suggests that reducing consumption of both animal products and refined carbohydrates is a plus for health.

I don't generally find the combination of unrefined fat and unrefined sugar to be a problem, I see no problem adding nuts or seeds to a fruit salad for example.

Really, eating whole foods is your only choice for optimal health.  Which isn't exactly mind-blowing, since we evolved eating mostly whole foods.  Not a lot of flour or hot dogs on the African savannah, after all.

Life expectancy on African Savannah is the hallmark everyone is aiming



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

scrapking said:
Stefan.De.Machtige said:

Not only did they eat much meat. Those guys ate perhaps 5 to 10 times more meat.

Brave lads, we can't measure up to those guys .

Ummmm....   got a link for that?  Because I can cite a tonne of sources that say otherwise, including analysis of mummified human hair and rehydration of fossilized human stool that doesn't leave much to the imagination about what people ate in times gone by.  All the evidence I've seen suggests your statement is categorically false.  It is true that meat consumption has dropped in a few countries over the last generation or so, which is positive, but it's nowhere near the 80-90% drop you suggest.  I can't see any way in which your statement could be correct, unless you're talking an incredibly short span of time, and an incredibly tiny geographic area that bucked the global trend.

EDIT:  I see in a follow-up post you said prehistory.  Now we know you're incorrect.  It's a myth that hunter-gatherers mostly hunted.  Most hunter-gatherer populations mostly gathered and had diets rich in plant foods.  This isn't a matter of debate, you can look at mummified hair and analyze it to get a sense of their diet.  Ditto when you find fossilized human stool.  A whole food vegan diet is more paleo than the so-called "paleo diet".

Prehistorical also had a very long aged live.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

scrapking said:
Cobretti2 said:
Interesting numbers wonder were as here no one I know has changed their diet in the last 5 years lol.

must be some hidden carnivore tribes that went to vegan instead of omnivore lol.

Vegans and vegetarians grew from 2.6% of the population in Israel in 2010, to 13% in 2014 (and appears to have grown even more since then).  (source: https://www.jta.org/2014/10/15/life-religion/israelis-growing-hungry-for-vegan-diet)

I'm not sure where you are, but veganism is estimated to have grown 500% in the U.S. between 2014 and 2017.  (source: https://www.riseofthevegan.com/blog/veganism-has-increased-500-since-2014-in-the-us)

You asked for where the change is coming from, and those are a couple of examples.  :)

I was more refering to friends and work colleges lol, but thanks for taking the time to respond. Good to know some facts.



 

 

I like playing a game where each time a vegan says the word vegan, i add a strip of bacon to the frying pan.



Medisti said:
Bristow9091 said:

Fuck sake, I read this and now I REALLY want a burger or two... think I know what I'm having for dinner! :P

We should all strive to be like the true hero of the people

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Gorske

And still alive... how many vegans have died before 70y?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."