Phone codes to unlock things doesn't equal more it's a short cut which they removed in B2 because it negated the point of playing the game the second game has just as much if not more than the first game (characters to unlock, costumes, weapons, challenge missions, modes, multiplayer battle missions etc..) sorry but what you posted there is untrue and B2 is easily harder than the first game the first game the enemies can't even hold a candle to the ones in the second, the Lumen Sage fight in the second game game even be touched by any fight in the original just from his AI alone.

Either way in the end I do not see Switch surpassing PS4. Might surpass XBONE as far as Metacritic goes since almost all multi plat games are reviewed mostly for PS4.

I tried to explain this with my other post in this thread.

In the OP we just see a sign of what jumping to new technology brings. The Switch is kind of ancient in terms of software tech. And i am sorry if that sounds harsh, but it is the reality. And i am not trying to downplay anything nintendo has done either, but most of what they did in botw for instance you can trace back to half life 2 days where it was 'new' tech. 

I think this brings a much more interesting discussion about what is more important though. The tech or the games?

In my opinion i think tech has an immeasurable importance and i am forever grateful to Sony for pushing the tech as far as it can go on their commercial platform.

The downplaying in this thread is epic but "ancient software like BoTW didn't do anything that HL2 already did 20 years ago" takes first prize.

Well, bonuses are still paid with Metacritic so even publishers put weight into them.

We're not publishers and I doubt that was the perspective the OP was intending to portray.

What we end up with, then, is a "list wars" entry that includes years old ports like Fez and Rayman Legends but leaves out games like Dragon Age, Far Cry, Final Fantasy XIV, and Mario + Rabbids.  Ask the average video game fan which is more relevant and see what they say.  Threads like this are just meta-score masterbation exercises with very little real meaning.  That's why it makes me chuckle when someone touts an arbitrary "90" from a handful of strangers while disregarding an "89".  That's just silly and makes people look out of touch with reality.