BraLoD said:
Ganoncrotch said:
I am a kid from 1983, I watched things on tv where people dropped anvils on each other, created food from rocks and fed them to each other, attacked each other with active live bombs.
I've not gone and done any of those things, because I am smart enough not to, this is the entirely what things like a darwin award is all about, when you see someone and legitimately think if you told them to walk off a cliff... would they? then that is the sort of level of intellect which when it walks off a cliff makes the human race better as a whole. I'm not just talking about "for the lulz" here I mean someone who is going to take the advice on what to eat from a youtube video posted by a retard rather than the warnings all over the package that says "don't fucking eat this you gobshite" Keep in mind as well there is the obvious fact of where the daughter got the things to eat? which suggests their mother is not someone who is careful about following warning labels to keep deadly things away from her kids, and also allows her child to watch media presumably unsupervised which encouraged her to eat something and die... again for the whole gene pool, this is the equivalent of that tiger you see in a documentary who just doesn't quite understand how to stop eating her young when she is licking it clean and that David Attenborough mournfully says will be the last tiger in her family tree because of it.
That is how a species gets better, it's fucking rough because at times you have to sit there and watch a tiger eating its own offspring and look sad about it, or a load of washing goes without a tidepod because someone has eaten it to try to get an extra 2 subscribers on youtube... but aye, that's how a species grows stronger without those elements remaining alive in it.
|
You didn't see actual people doing any of that, you watched to cartoons. Or at the very best TV series which NEVER challenged you to try it, and you never had access to active bombs or someone with enough force to drop an anvil into you.
Youtube challenges are very personal and influential things made from people to get other people, specially young ones.
I raised my hands to help Goku make a Genki Dama and imitated the Power Rangers when I was a kid, though I've always been a decently smart person and wouldn't fall for obvious stuff like getting guns or bombs or near fire, I honestly wouldn't know I could die because of a deodorant spray even though I would still know it wouldn't be good.
About reading, again she was 7, she was starting to learn it.
There is nothing about species getting better because an ingenuous little kid died because it was ingenuous, it's actually the opposite, people doing this shit is making our species get worse by spreading its shit on the young.
|
You have some conflicting portions in this lovely stand up for the little guy post, either the person isn't of an age where she can read, or she can read and is capable of using a computer/mobile device to search for videos online. Either that or again the person who is responsible for the wellbeing of a 7 year old which is the parent has queued their daughter up a playlist of "tidepod challenge" vids and sat her in front of it. The same person who can't read a "do not eat this" warning also cannot operate and search for a youtube video on their own.
As for the "only seen it in cartoons" no, by the time I was 7 it was the start of the 90s Ace Ventura was a thing along with Jim Careys OTT brand of slap stick comedy, from head spinning to impacts so hard they would kill a person in the real world, I sat and watched live action humans do things which were for comedy or suspense, while I may have uttered "Alrighty then" I most certainly didn't stick my head out the car window like a dog as we drove somewhere because 1. I knew it to be dangerous and 2. my parents would have stopped me and told me it was dangerous if I had attempted to do it.
My feelings on this are not just limited to this 7 year old kid, did you guys see the story of the youtube vid where a woman got her boyfriend (and father of her two children) to hold a HARDBACK book in front of his chest and then shot it with a desert eagle gun? Her toddler was in the room when she fired the pistol too, so that kid has 1 parent who is in jail and is potentially deaf from the blast. Darwinism caused by online videos today is no different than throughout history, if you go back 30 years ago you'll hear people talking about TV rotting kids minds, 20 years ago and gaming will rot our kids minds... youtube videos featuring tidepods? they'll rot you kids insides. A new century and a new era of idiots to die to stupid shit basically.
https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/29/us/fatal-youtube-stunt/index.html
She fired from less than a foot away into a book over his chest with that.
even had the bullet not gone through the book, the transfer of energy from bullet to a A4 sized block in front of his chest would still have shattered all his ribs and from the flash probably left his wheezing dying body with severe burns, these people again... were never going to be a part of a major human advancement.
