By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
habam said:
Chazore said:

You're acting completely arrogant in trying to tell me that it's a reality that everyone wants to go for VR and abandon screen gameplay. You aren't even aware as to how you come off as, even to those that have already told you differently. 

Thats not what I said. I said EVERYBODY that I know has tried VR for 100% likes the expierence and think its better then VR.

You dont NOBODY in person that think otherwhise. So the discussion is kind of nonsense. Because you talk without any expierence.

You don't get to decide who has experience and who doesn't based on whether or not they disagree with you!



Around the Network
potato_hamster said:

 

You're the one that's acting like depth cannot accurately be shown on a screen. That's very clearly not the case.

it cant lol. If your not interested in VR or cant afford it, its fine. Just dont go into VR threads lmao. I dont own a Xbox one and know what? I didnt click on any "sea of thieves" beta forum and call the game bad there or any other game superior. I just dont care. But just stop to annoy people that actually can afford VR with obviously completly false "facts".



potato_hamster said:
habam said:

Thats not what I said. I said EVERYBODY that I know has tried VR for 100% likes the expierence and think its better then VR.

You dont NOBODY in person that think otherwhise. So the discussion is kind of nonsense. Because you talk without any expierence.

You don't get to decide who has experience and who doesn't based on whether or not they disagree with you!

I like how he's now trying to move goal posts and shutting people out, who he thinks haven't tried VR  



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Chazore said:
potato_hamster said:

You don't get to decide who has experience and who doesn't based on whether or not they disagree with you!

I like how he's now trying to move goal posts and shutting people out, who he thinks haven't tried VR  

yeah funny haha, still your missing out, not me.



habam said:
Chazore said:

I like how he's now trying to move goal posts and shutting people out, who he thinks haven't tried VR  

yeah funny haha, still your missing out, not me.

Except you're the one missing out on information, not me  



Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see

So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"

Around the Network
habam said:
potato_hamster said:

 

You're the one that's acting like depth cannot accurately be shown on a screen. That's very clearly not the case.

it cant lol. If your not interested in VR or cant afford it, its fine. Just dont go into VR threads lmao. I dont own a Xbox one and know what? I didnt click on any "sea of thieves" beta forum and call the game bad there or any other game superior. I just dont care. But just stop to annoy people that actually can afford VR with obviously completly false "facts".

It can, and it has. Don't be so ignorant.

Current VR doesn't do anything for me, and is not worth the price. Money has nothing to do with it. I got a Switch a month ago which costs more than PSVR.



habam said:
potato_hamster said:

 

You're the one that's acting like depth cannot accurately be shown on a screen. That's very clearly not the case.

it cant lol. If your not interested in VR or cant afford it, its fine. Just dont go into VR threads lmao. I dont own a Xbox one and know what? I didnt click on any "sea of thieves" beta forum and call the game bad there or any other game superior. I just dont care. But just stop to annoy people that actually can afford VR with obviously completly false "facts".

Don't remember this?

It's incredibly simple to simulate depth with a screen.

Parallax is just as important a distance cue as stereoscopic vision. Stereoscopic vision is only important for very close objects. For racing games in VR stereoscopic view is important to simulate the car around you, not so much for the road and beyond. In an expensive simulator you're already sitting in the car, plane or boat and the screen is at a distance where stereoscopic cues are far less important. If it was important they could simply use passive 3D glasses as in the cinema.

Anyway i don 't have 6 million for a real car simulator, nor room for a 360 degree curved screen and 8 projectors to feed them. I did have CAD 500 for the next best thing :)



SvennoJ said:
habam said:

it cant lol. If your not interested in VR or cant afford it, its fine. Just dont go into VR threads lmao. I dont own a Xbox one and know what? I didnt click on any "sea of thieves" beta forum and call the game bad there or any other game superior. I just dont care. But just stop to annoy people that actually can afford VR with obviously completly false "facts".

Don't remember this?

It's incredibly simple to simulate depth with a screen.

Parallax is just as important a distance cue as stereoscopic vision. Stereoscopic vision is only important for very close objects. For racing games in VR stereoscopic view is important to simulate the car around you, not so much for the road and beyond. In an expensive simulator you're already sitting in the car, plane or boat and the screen is at a distance where stereoscopic cues are far less important. If it was important they could simply use passive 3D glasses as in the cinema.

Anyway i don 't have 6 million for a real car simulator, nor room for a 360 degree curved screen and 8 projectors to feed them. I did have CAD 500 for the next best thing :)

I do know this, had it on my phone. Not compareable to VR.



potato_hamster said:
habam said:

it cant lol. If your not interested in VR or cant afford it, its fine. Just dont go into VR threads lmao. I dont own a Xbox one and know what? I didnt click on any "sea of thieves" beta forum and call the game bad there or any other game superior. I just dont care. But just stop to annoy people that actually can afford VR with obviously completly false "facts".

It can, and it has. Don't be so ignorant.

Current VR doesn't do anything for me, and is not worth the price. Money has nothing to do with it. I got a Switch a month ago which costs more than PSVR.

Thanks for finally admitting it, at least.



habam said:

I do know this, had it on my phone. Not compareable to VR.

I know, but that wasn't the point. And it does come close to VR when you sit in a car with a screen all around outside that adjusts the image based on the position of your head. Close one eye with the vr headset on and see how it all still works. Stereoscopic depth perception is only a small part. Besides that, VR is still missing depth perception based on focal length cues which sitting in a car simulator doesn't lack.

Ofcourse what that car simulator can't do is swap between sitting in a kart, a samba bus, road cars, race cars, etc. A 6 million dollar car game with only 1 car, and people complain about the lack of content on GT Sport :p