By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Hollywood anti catholic bullshit needs to stop

WolfpackN64 said:
z101 said:

They are attributed to the catholic church, because she is obviously directly responsible for many bad things that happen in the world. For example: The suppression of sexuality as practiced by the Catholic Church (or Islam and other religious) naturally has all kinds of perverse consequences, such as paedophilia or rape.

The Catholic Church continues to prohibit the use of condoms and contraceptives, with catastrophic consequences all over the world.  

However, history and psychology has shown that people who are required to suppress completely normal behaviour are easier to control, even if a few of them drift into extreme behaviour.

And that's also something where theit position can and has changed. As for people needing to control their sexuality at least somewhat. That's just common sense. But we more often then not seem to have drifted into an "anything goes" scenario.

As long as nobody gets hurt, "anything goes" should be the standard. Regarding sex: People should be educated so they use condoms & co, but the church even tries to suppress sexual education in school.



Around the Network
OneTime said:
epicurean said:

That's a different arguement. :)

Again, I said that apart from any specific religion.

Did physics exist before the big bang?

Yup physics by definition needs to be extended to cover the Big Bang (although time didn’t exist before the Big Bang - so there is no before)

So if time didn't exist before the Big-Bang, then it would be correct to say the universe had a beginning? 



Owner of PS4 Pro, Xbox One, Switch, PS Vita, and 3DS

z101 said:
WolfpackN64 said:

And that's also something where theit position can and has changed. As for people needing to control their sexuality at least somewhat. That's just common sense. But we more often then not seem to have drifted into an "anything goes" scenario.

As long as nobody gets hurt, "anything goes" should be the standard. Regarding sex: People should be educated so they use condoms & co, but the church even tries to suppress sexual education in school.

I had sex ed in my school and they showed how to apply condoms and everything... And my school is catholic.



epicurean said:
OneTime said:

Yup physics by definition needs to be extended to cover the Big Bang (although time didn’t exist before the Big Bang - so there is no before)

So if time didn't exist before the Big-Bang, then it would be correct to say the universe had a beginning? 

Yes, the Big Bang.



irstupid said:
SpokenTruth said:

I need to clarify a few things for you.  Our common understanding of the big bang is actually horribly explained.  We try to simplify the concept and yet we create false ideas of it when we do.

Most people think of this tiny point which contained everything in the universe.  This is only partially correct.  Everything in our "observable" universe was contained in a single point....let me back up first.  Are you familiar with the difference between the known or observable universe and the entire universe?  It really helps to understand the Big Bang if you grasp that part well first.  If needed, we can start a new thread.

I'm just talking in broad terms, not trying to get into the finer details. All finer details does is make people confused and your arguing over semantics versus the general idea.

Whether all the stuff in the universe was packed into a pin prick size or if it was all some giant gas giant the size of the milky way before is exploded/expanded/whatever is besides the point.

The questions are:

1. Where did all that stuff originally come from? Was that matter/energy/ect always there. How can something always be there? Shouldn't there have to be a beginning at some point. How can something have always been? If it was created, how was something created from nothing?

2. What was outside that ball of shit? Nothing? As someone posted to me earlier, no time, no space, no nothing. How can something be nothing. If I was to somehow step outside that ball, I step into nothing? How can time not exist?

3. If the universe is ever expanding, how can it be infinite. Something infinite is infinite. you can't +1 infinity. This isn't elementary school comebacks. So if I were to travel faster than the universe is expanding, what would I run into when I get past it? Again the concept of nothing, no time/space/ect makes less sense than any magical god of any religion.

4. If there is somehow a no time/no space place, then nothing is infinite. I've heard our universe will end at some point, so then nothing inside our universe is infite. Time will end, and as with the big bang, time began at some point. If there is a place of nothing outside our universe, then our universe is not infinite.

3. Ah... that makes no sense, mathematically. Firstly, there *are* infinite infinitys of strictly different sizes (look up: cardinalities. One common example is that the set of all real numbers is strictly larger than the set of natural numbers. Generally, if you take an infinite set, the set of all subsets is strictly greater, which is how we know there to be infinite *sizes* of infinity.) Though that certainly isn’t necessary to explain an expanding universe of infinite size - notice, in this context, expanding simply means that any two objects, in average, get farther and farther apart. Look up hilbert’s hotel for that.

 

I have no education on the physics involved in the big bang theory, so I won’t try to explain something about it. However, something you generally have to understand is that if you can come up with a question, physicians have certainly thought about it as well. And there most likely exists a perfectly coherent answer to those questions, it’s just unlikely that you could *understand* it. People spend years upon years on physical concepts before attempting to read any contempory papers. The accumulated knowledge is just too great for anything to be accessible to a general audience, these days, sadly.

 

And there certainly are things that we do not know, there will always be things that we cannot know. But that in no way invalidates any of the work that scientists have created on what we CAN know.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.

Around the Network
setsunatenshi said:
epicurean said:

So if time didn't exist before the Big-Bang, then it would be correct to say the universe had a beginning? 

Yes, the Big Bang.

 

Pretty much - but this is a hotly debated area of physics.  The opinions have probably changed since I studied!

The basic principle is that time only happens because something physical happens.  So an atomic clock atom decays, or entropy (randomness) increases.  If there is no energy or matter, then nothing happens, so time doesn’t exist.

 

don’t forget that the rate that time passes varies with relative speeds, etc.  So at least that much can be measured experimentally.  I never fully understood what people were saying, so this is my understanding :)



IMO The Catholic Church is worse. Especially considering they have the power to hide most of their corruption and scandalous activities.



FIT_Gamer said:
IMO The Catholic Church is worse. Especially considering they have the power to hide most of their corruption and scandalous activities.

And every once in a while, someone comes in who has missed the entire conversation. Bravo...



epicurean said:
OneTime said:

Yup physics by definition needs to be extended to cover the Big Bang (although time didn’t exist before the Big Bang - so there is no before)

So if time didn't exist before the Big-Bang, then it would be correct to say the universe had a beginning? 

No, because we don't know. 

The universe could have existed forever and has been contracting and expanding to and from a singularity forever. We would likely never know because the big bang destroys any evidence we can detect of what was before by virtue of the event, all science knows so far is that it happened.



There's only 2 races: White and 'Political Agenda'
2 Genders: Male and 'Political Agenda'
2 Hairstyles for female characters: Long and 'Political Agenda'
2 Sexualities: Straight and 'Political Agenda'

ArchangelMadzz said:
epicurean said:

So if time didn't exist before the Big-Bang, then it would be correct to say the universe had a beginning? 

No, because we don't know. 

The universe could have existed forever and has been contracting and expanding to and from a singularity forever. We would likely never know because the big bang destroys any evidence we can detect of what was before by virtue of the event, all science knows so far is that it happened.

 

Good correction.  :).  There are a number of theories.  Personally I prefer the “this is the only Big Bang”, but I am in noooooooooo way qualified to say that :)