By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Why do Nintendo handhelds do better than their home consoles?

Nintendo and Sony have different strengths as companies.  When you look at what their strengths are, then you realize that Sony has an advantage in the home console space and Nintendo has an advantage in the handheld space.  Overall I would say Nintendo has a slight edge, but it is all close enough to make it interesting.

For example, Sony's biggest advantage is that it is an electronics company.  That means it dominates in terms of pure hardware.  Sony's strategy each time is to make a quality piece of fairly powerful hardware and then sell it at a loss.  It makes the profit on the games to compensate from the loss on hardware.  This is a good strategy for Sony, because anyone who tries to compete directly on hardware either has to take a bigger loss on their hardware or jack their console prices up.  This is the sort of thing that killed Sega.  (That and Sega's business side just wasn't as solid as Nintendo's or Sony's.)  Nintendo found they were fighting a losing battle on hardware during the N64 and Gamecube Eras, so they just decided to sell less powerful home consoles since then and see if they can get that to work.

In contrast to Sony, Nintendo's biggest advantage is in making games.  Everyone knows that Nintendo makes great 1st party games, but they can also make very popular games without using many resources.  Like Nintendo can just take a small team and give them a shoestring budget and they end up making a game like Brain Age that sells like crazy.  Sony has never really done anything like that.  So if you put the two companies in an environment where raw power doesn't really matter, like the handheld market, then Nintendo is going to clean Sony's clock.  Nintendo has had many competitors in the handheld space, but Nintendo just clobbers all of them.

Both companies have other strengths and weaknesses too.  Like Sony has a better relationship with Western 3rd party developers.  Nintendo is better with controller innovations like the analogue stick or wireless controls.  Sony just tries to copy this stuff and hope they get it good enough.

Overall I think Nintendo has a slight advantage, because I think making good games is the most important thing.  Overall they are pretty close though with one company having the advantage in the home space and the other in the handheld space.



Around the Network

Japan + Pokemon + Better third party support for portable titles.



0331 Happiness is a belt-fed weapon

Less competition, and it's more common for a household to have more than 1 handleds while consoles are usually 1 per household. Also they are cheaper.



Generally cheaper and more profitable for 3rd parties to support it. In the past, Nintendo kept modest hardware for a modest price. Games were made cheaper and sold cheaper and made a lot more money. Less risk more reward and more games because of it. Nintendo had their big franchises and 3rd parties heavily support the hardware. Nintendo is good about giving the tools to develop games on their handhelds. Complete opposite to all of this on their home consoles.



zorg1000 said:
AlfredoTurkey said:

They USE to do better because they were cheap. The GBA was only $79.99 when it launched. When the 3DS came out it sold like shit until they dropped the price. It was all based on cost and affordability.

Im pretty sure GBA launched at $99, but regardless i get your point.

You both are close but wrong. It was $89.99. I bought one new on launch for 90 bucks.



Around the Network

In the early days the Lynx was to big, had few (if any) good games, hungry on batteries and was too expensive. The game gear was to big, hungry on batteries and was too expensive.

Later on it has been a problem with the competition that they always try to cram in other functionality while the nintendo systems just play games.

Thats why I’m horrified when people want youtube/netflix/browser for the switch. Just fuck off with your opinions on this, everyone allready have at least 2 more devices in their home that can do these things. Let nintendo do what they do best; a gaming device, not a multimedia device.



SegataSanshiro said:
zorg1000 said:

Im pretty sure GBA launched at $99, but regardless i get your point.

You both are close but wrong. It was $89.99. I bought one new on launch for 90 bucks.

Nope

http://m.ign.com/articles/2001/03/08/the-us-price-and-launch-titles-for-gba



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

SegataSanshiro said:
zorg1000 said:

Im pretty sure GBA launched at $99, but regardless i get your point.

You both are close but wrong. It was $89.99. I bought one new on launch for 90 bucks.

"The Game Boy Advance, released in 2001 for $99.99 USD would set Nintendo fans back about $123 USD today. The GBA SP also launched at the same price in 2003. One Nintendo platform not on this list is the doomed Virtual Boy, which launched in 1995 for about $180 USD"

 

That is a quote from: https://kotaku.com/5737948/how-does-the-nintendo-3ds-price-stack-up

 

I bought mine for a hundo



01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000

Nintendo just understands the mobile market extremely well.



Because parents don't want to share their TVs.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.