oniyide said:
GhaudePhaede010 said:
So... we just gonna act like 1 2 Switch isn't a thing?
Look, what you mean to say is that MARKETING THE CONSOLE AS A MOTION CONTROLLED VIDEO GAME MACHINE was a fad. But motion controls are still in gaming today and that cannot be ignored because of the current trend on its marketing. I mean, I was just playing Resident Evil with motion controls not 20 minutes ago. And all consoles on the market have motion controls to some capacity which means, motion controls are not a fad. The marketing for motion controls are a fad, however.
|
and how well is that game doing compared to say Zelda? Mario Kart? its not like 12Switch is even going to do Wii Sports Resort numbers Yes motion controls are still here but its not selling CAUSE of motion controls, lets not pretend like it is. Their is a reason why we dont see marketing for it, those things are not mutually exclusive.
|
I do not see your point in the least. How is a game doing in comparison to another great selling game? Makes no sense. Arms and 1 2 Switch are sales successes, regardless of the goal posts you want to try to imply.
Wii did not sell on Zelda Mario and Metroid in the first year? You would be kidding yourself to think otherwise. Saying Wii sold only on motion controls, or even because of motion controls is to disrespect the work Nintendo put into making that console a success. People ignored motion controls in Smash just like they do in Arms. It does not negate that the option is there or that motion controls are not a staple of gaming. And besides, you completely ignored that motion controls are not a gimmick. If they are used in every console since its release and we are almost 12 years and 5 or 6 consoles later, you have to admit that motion controls are not a gimmick. That is a fact.
The best you can say is, "a console being marketed around motion controls..." which is true but the actual motion controls are indeed not a fad. Just like touch screen gaming is not a fad.