Thats not running fine to be honest. 

Yeah all these stuff you have listed is true but its also true for X86 hardware especially limited to 400$-500$, and i think it still better and easier to just have an extra processor than some Mhz more. Sony knows both architectures now , X86 and Cell, it shouldnt be that hard to make that work together. And as i have mentioned before it should be Reserved for certain things not the whole game. And you forget the XDR2 Ram.

I think the ship has sailed on Cell. Sony would be the only one using it, and I think it would actually cost a lot. It would have been awesome if things went better, and we had Cell in all Sony products as Ken Kutaragi had envisioned, but that is not a reality.

At this point I think Sony has to stick to what made the PS4 successful. Make PlayStation the most simple and effecient device on the market. Straight forward, super optimized chips that run a language that everyone knows.

There are much better sub processors available for PS5 if Sony wants to offload processes to dedicated chips.

Ah, that is fine for a relatively young emulator.
Given a few years of development pretty much all games will run beyond a PS3 on that same processor.
Sony would use a more advanced, faster CPU in their PS5, with an OS that runs with less overhead.

You don't just hand over some cash to Lisa Su and get some extra megahertz in return.
Sony could spend that fifty dollars and buy extra GPU cores, or whatever.

If they spend fifty USD on a Cell, Microsoft can undercut Sony by fifty dollars, or spend their fifty dollars elsewhere.
Assuming that Sony sells ten million units year one, when the Cell + XDR2 is fifty USD.
What is 10,000,000 * 50?
500,000,000 USD.
Half a billion dollars wasted in one year.

You don't just throw a $50 component into a product.
Half a billion dollars would be better spent on marketing.

Goodbye.

try google about ipc in cpu, clock is not all, try google about gpgpu, and finally try google to how a game frame is done in a computer. and the cpu is powerpc or x86, gpu is about pascal, vega and etc. jaguar is weak cpu, ryzen is too more powerfull, sony dont need cell.

go back to the cell processor and write off the entire ps4 games library, and have your competitors have hardware backwards compatibility... or stick with x86 and have native backwards compatibility and a massive library of games directly compatible (potentially with upgrades) at launch?

hmmmmm

No. They’ll face the same high costs that they faced with the original PS3, and it would basically mean no PS4 BC if they decide not to try and fit a PS4 inside of it. I like the idea of building around x86 because developers love it and it means all the games we play right can continue to be relevant as newer hardware offers boosts to performance.

 That’s why I don’t think we’ll see a PS5 for a good while. It seems unlikely Sony will want to put out a console at > $400, so they’ll likely wait until they can release a console that has the proper hardware at that sweet $400 price tag. 

There are 13 fukking flavors of SPAM.

I mean, using an architecture that is hard to develop for while the competitor use the more standard and easier to develop architecture is better right? Now the developer will have even more excuse if the game isn't running smoothly

Use a better CPU thats x 86 for ps5 and it's all good