Well those are really offensive words.
Banning "science-based" and "evidence-based" in particular makes a lot of sense, because it's important that official documents only contain words that the president understands.
Well those are really offensive words.
Banning "science-based" and "evidence-based" in particular makes a lot of sense, because it's important that official documents only contain words that the president understands.
Evidence and science are very scary things, I praise the White House's decision to protect the American population from these nightmares.
I wonder why these words? Specifically science based, evidence based and fetus
Very odd. Have to look into it more.
I can understand him, Middle Ages look very attractive in TV fiction.
Hope he'll hire very strong battlemages to replace artillery and the finest druids to replace doctors and scientists.
monocle_layton said:
What? Of course it’ll piss people off. It’s literally banning key terms that will make a plethora of subjects exponentially more difficult to write about (or even write about).
A man who’s supposedly pro life shouldn’t block fetus, especially considering how they are vital to understanding how to stop several illnesses |
I think the idea is to call what they believe it to be, which is unborn child.
outlawauron said:
I think the idea is to call what they believe it to be, which is unborn child. |
Little do they know that this move will backfire when the CDC adopts the official terminology "tiny human-esque meat blob"
JRPGfan said: If this story wasnt from a credible newspaper Im not sure Id believe the OP. It sounds so wacky. |
Seriously. I don’t read the news anymore, but I still check on futurism and some tech websites.
Seeing this from them made me go look up the CDC online. How does anyone support this awful administration?
Nem said: lolol "the land of the free". |
I am terrified. I get having different opinion, but some people literally ignore common sense and facts. How can people live still believing in creationism or anti science bullshit?
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Yes, it's the land of the free. In special, free of some words now. Btw, what would happen if the CDC wouldn't follow that directive? |
They can probably say goodbye to their funding. They already took a ridiculous cut on any gun research because of nonsensical lobbing from the NRA. If they break the rules it’ll be ugly for them.
VGPolyglot said: Evidence and science are very scary things, I praise the White House's decision to protect the American population from these nightmares. |
Yeah, wouldn’t want the American people to have common sense. We wouldn’t have the Republican Party if that were the case
StarOcean said:
As long as it's "lulz it maeks th' left maddd!!1! XDXDxD" they're okay with it. Don't forget the moment it's "God" "Jesus" or "Christ" they'd need to change their tampon |
Imagine if we had internet during the holocaust. Dumbasses would probably be like ‘HURR LOOK AT DEM LEEBERALS GETTING TRIGGERED OVER JEWS DYING! LOL KEK xdddddimpurecancerdddd’. How someone can get so much satisfaction from triggering 2 people on the internet is beyond me.
Lol if true but it's so ridiculous that I had to google it and :
http://time.com/5068160/cdc-banned-words-transgender/
So what is true and what is false?
forest-spirit said: Well those are really offensive words. |
He knows words, he has the best words! xDDDD