By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Israel-Palestine: Which "solution" do you prefer?

spurgeonryan said:
Jumpin said:

Why shouldn't they be? Along with the Persian nations, they have received the burden of several million refugees thanks to militant Israeli immigration. Jordan is pretty close to bursting into nationalism due to the Palestinian refugee crisis along with the addition of the Syrian and Iraqi crisis that began with the US invasion of Iraq.

This is all their fight.

I agree to leave Saudi Arabia out of it, they don't take refugees, they just bomb them.

I can imagine if Israel ceases to exist they will get many more refugees as will the world. Too many upset people,  you need to have people that have nothing invested in the decision to make the choice. As people said,  whether it is 2,000 years or 68, it is a long time to fight about something. Many have grown and died fighting this battle. 

Allowing unrelated parties would be a terrible idea. First of all, that is how the situation began. The people who got together to create Israel didn't give any thought to the native peoples of the region, who had been there for thousands of years to make way for the immigration of millions of foreigners based solely on what religion they belonged to. They kicked them out of their homes, forced them into poverty, refugee camps, and gangs.  of the native population to allow for the unrestricted immigration of millions of foreigners. If experts, and people who actually had a stake in the lands, there wouldn't be the problems we have today; the resulting mass poverty, homelessness, and the worst refugee crisis of the 20th and 21st centuries, an, at this rate, the 22nd century as well.

You can't have peace when negotiation isn't part of the process. Anyone not treated favourably is not going to find it acceptable, and ultimately it will fail.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network

I forgot just how small the territory was! The combined area of Israel, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Jerusalem and Golan Heights is only around 29,000km2.



Proxy-Pie said:

I'll give you my thoughts as a Palestinian with Israeli citizenship (part of the Arabs of 48 - the ones who stayed in their villages/towns after the war, in Israel's side of the Green Line).

 

I believe that the 2 state solution isn't just a solution, it's the only one that can work. Sure there are lots of people on both sides that want peace, but there are too many who hate the other side, that I just can't see 1 fully democratic state form. As an Israeli politician said before, if Israel absorbs the Palestinian territories, it'll either stop being Jewish (Since it'll quickly turn into an Arab majority), or stop being Democratic (Become an official apartheid system).

 

I blame the hate on religious/ethnic fanatics. I've yet to meet somebody in my daily interactions with Jews in technological areas that thinks of me as a "lesser" person because I'm an Arab, but you can bet I've met some in other areas. 

 

I think Jerusalem should be joint control. 

Yeah people truly forget that the majority of Palestinians/Israelis couldn't give less of a shit about any of this and would opt for a 2 state solution. 

 

Just the same few nutjobs who make it impossible. Regardless of what occurs, I just wish it resolves before I die. Nothing worse than when I go there and have to fucking avoid an armed conflict between some IDF soldiers and people throwing rocksm



StarOcean said:
Aeolus451 said:

....So Israel/jews are neo-nazis?

They act like it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck -then it's probably a duck. I have no sympathy for them. They deserve to be treated the same way they treat the Palestinians. Concentration camps, steal their land, etc 

Wow...you really got the picture wrong.

 

To generalize the image so broadly is a bit insulting in all honesty. The issues surround the illegal settlements and a few other regions, not all of Israel and Palestine. How do you expect anyone to take you seriously with that statement?



CrazyGamer2017 said:

Another example would be France who took some territory from Germany after world war 1 (Alsace-Lorraine) and never returned it...

My point being that this issue depends very much on the country and on the history of the land. And even if we agreed to call Israel imperialists (which I do not), there are precedents by countries like France. Even the US can be considered imperialistic when it made war to the American Natives known as Indians to take their land. And I won't even talk about the UK and Northern Ireland...

As for Israel most of the land there was theirs a very long time ago (Kingdom of Israel and Kingdom of Judah) The Philistines had a strip of land roughly where the Gaza strip is today but the west bank is historically Jewish. So if you refer to the Israel as made by the UN in 1947 then yeah, you have a bit of a point but if you take into account land that was Jewish before it was palestinian then Israel is only taking back land that is historically speaking, theirs. And beyond that, I guess it will become a matter of opinion. Do they have the right to take back what was theirs or not?

I can understand that you disagree but in exchange you must understand that 1: other countries like France, the US, the UK and probably more have taken land from others that was NEVER theirs to begin with, at least Israel is only taking back what was theirs long ago. 2: The real issue here goes beyond the issue of land. Muslims are absolutely mad about the fact that non muslims live and have a state right in the middle of theirs and I'm talking about all the countries surrounding Israel, so the issue here is not just palestine, but to get rid of people that though with the same historical origin (sons of Abraham) as the other people in that region, have DARED to follow their beliefs instead of becoming muslims. Which is why peace is pretty much impossible cause what palestinians really want is the destruction of Israel which is exactly why I can understand that Israel deals with them in a tough way and not only should take the west bank who historically has been theirs but since the palestinians only wish for their destruction, there will never be peace in that region, until the palestinians are driven out of that land. The logic is clear: if there are no palestinians in the west bank there is no war to be waged with the west bank.

Again I can understand your side of the argument, the "legal" situation made by the UN in 1947. But like I'm explaining, this issue goes beyond what was simply legally decided in 1947.

All of these examples you mentioned had occurred before WWII where we're supposed to know better in the age of information and Israel is by the very definition straight up imperialist, more so than Russia which says a lot. You also must not know a lot about early history of the US if that's how you think anglophones expanded the territory because the vast majority of native americans were eliminated through small pox and not through force ... 

There are no historical documents about either the Kingdom of Israel or Judah ever having existed so their history cannot be preserved but there are historical documents of the Ottoman empire having claim to the territory for nearly 400 years which was an Islamic centric body so by historic religious rights the palestinians have more claim to Israel than the jews themselves! Israel is flat out an artificial state created by both the UN and the British mandate and has only existed for nearly 70 years so the Jewish aren't taking back anything, their just been handed territory only to take more of the arabs given share ... 

You can at least attest to the fact that Israel is unjustly occupying the originally allotted palestinian land, no ? Do you really want another situation like China/Tibet where the more powerful state is bullying the weaker state ? On what other grounds do you think that the land that the jews have taken is theirs and where is justice for the palestinians that have been robbed of the land that they were given ? 

Are you seriously implicating genocide with your last paragraph ?! Let me be clear that is the thought process of Nazi's that would ironically be running through Israel ... 



Around the Network
FallingTitan said:

Since when was trump the king of the world? just cuz he says something ppl go nuts? cringe.

You do realize that the US Congress passed a bill in the 90s that declared Jerusalem the capital of Israel?? President since have been using a loophole in the law to "delay" the official move. Trump simply said "I will stop signing the waiver". That is all. 



End of 2009 Predictions (Set, January 1st 2009)

Wii- 72 million   3rd Year Peak, better slate of releases

360- 37 million   Should trend down slightly after 3rd year peak

PS3- 29 million  Sales should pick up next year, 3rd year peak and price cut

monocle_layton said:
NightDragon83 said:

Maybe you did nazi the humor in my comment, eh?

A final solution joke and a terrible nazi pun? For fuck's sake, how do you think anyone will take you seriously?

NightDragon83 said:

Yup, I'm sure if the Israelis just stopped building on disputed territory, that would solve all the problems over there...

...or just embolden their enemies when the see how violence and terrorism gets results for them.

So Israel isn't harming innocent civilians as well?

 

Taking over land isn't the only practical solution. It honestly isn't. Palestine has a high amount of reported civilian casualties as well.

You've got people in this thread literally comparing modern day Jews / Israelis to neo-Nazis... I think a couple lame holocaust jokes are the least of the issues here.  I wonder if the people who take the Palestinians' side of the conflict would still support them if they were all blonde haired, blue-eyed, lily white Europeans.  Mein Kampf is a regular best seller in the Arab world for a reason, you know.  And if today's Jews = neo-Nazis, does that mean it's now OK to punch Jews?  Since today's social justice crowd has no self awareness or sense of irony, there's honestly no way to tell.

As for the poor Palestinians and their "plight" against the big meanie Israelis, I can tell you that while the Palestinians may have garnered sympathy during the 90s and leading up to the failed peace talks in 2000, the vast majority of people here in the US stopped giving any f*cks about the Palestinians after seeing them celebrating in the streets on 9/11 and continuing to support terrorism and "intifadas" against Israel and the West.



On 2/24/13, MB1025 said:
You know I was always wondering why no one ever used the dollar sign for $ony, but then I realized they have no money so it would be pointless.

Ka-pi96 said:
israel ceases to exist. The israelis can either stay and become Palestinian citizens (who are required to follow Palestinian laws and respect Palestinian ownership of land) or they can fuck off elsewhere.

I have a feeling that this is an outcome that will never happen due to longstanding beliefs held internationally.



Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda Muda!!!!


Aeolus451 said:
StarOcean said:

Why do you keep asking me what left leaners think? I don't know. I'm not a left leaner. Ask anyone who listens to me on Discord. I hold very few left leaning values -I arguably hold more right leaning values. And the Jews kill a lot of Palestinians because they are Palestinians. Do you think the UN should have given up land that was not theres? No. They shouldn't. If they wanted to actually do right they'd give up land in the US, UK, EU. But they didn't. Because they didn't care about the Jews either. Giving them Israel was self-promotion. It made them look good on the surface while they created issues that future generations would have to face later, like now. And now these "Jews" are treating the Palestinians like shit for no reason

Well, because you are left leaning because of your positions on politics. It's not a knock or anything. Do I think the UN should give out land after a war? Japan took alot of land before and during that war. The UN gave most of it back. The UN gave jews Israel because of WW2 and because Jerusalem was theirs for a long time. It's good enough for me. I know that Israelis will let anyone into the holy sites without being messed with. They're the best and most pragmatic choice considering the situation.  

I still don't see how being against Trump is left leaning in any way. 

And you have turned a blind eye to the native Palestinians 



VGPolyglot said:
NightDragon83 said:
Whatever the solution is, I hope it's "final" *wink wink*

I'm not amused.

The... wording in the thread title is kinda "weird". "Provocative". Some would even call it "inappropriate".

 

How to resolve this struggle? I don't see no end to this, because nobody is willing to end it, either peacefully or by force.



Hunting Season is done...