tbone51 said:
Lawlight said:
The majority of people knew that it would do well simply because it is the 3DS’s successor while also being a cheap console. Sure it is doing better than most expected. And no matter what you say price makes a big difference. Also, the PS4 is one of the fastest selling when you consider WW sales, not just US when it’s actually not selling that fast. Ask yourself - how would the Switch sales in the US have compared to the PS4’s if the latter was released at $299?
|
Alot of ifs. What if switch launched at $250 instead? How about $150? How about $400?
And your wrong, majority thought it wouldnt do well at all back in the beginning of the year. All you do is need to find the threads back in jan/feb
|
I think your attempt to disprove his argument is just reinforcing it.
All he's saying is that pricing matters. So its weird comparing sales of something that released at $399 to something that released at $299. I don't get how that concept is so hard to accept unless you just don't wanna accept it.
Then the bolded part in your post... just goes to prove what I am saying, cause it means you actually get it.
If the PS4/NS sold 800k at $400/$300 respectively, then common sense dictates that if they were $300/$200 respectively at that same time they would have sold more. Which means that if the argument is that both are performing the exact same or similar, then you cannot ignore the one major differentiating factor which is the price.
And this goes in all directions. At $299 in it first holiday PS4 would have sold more than it did. In its first holiday at $199 PS4 would be expected to sell more than the NS at $299. When the NS drops its price it would be expected to do better than it has done now.
All points to one thing.... price is important.