https://www.resetera.com/posts/2141920/

So It was basically between 1.3 and 1.5 million. So u decide to go around saying it's only at 1.3 million. And you state it like it's a matter of fact.

First off, see the post I made just above about why the Switch's numbers aren't bad.

Second, saying the Switch won't match the 3DS after this short of a time span is a pretty ballsy claim, considering there is no consistent ratio between first-year sales and lifetime sales, even with just Nintendo systems. There is no reason to assume "Switch 2017 ≤ 3DS 2011, therefore Switch lifetime ≤ 3DS lifetime."

The Switch may have had four notable games this year, but Zelda and 3D Mario are not proven consistent system-sellers, MK8D was a re-release of 3-year-old Wii U game (re-releases never move any significant amount of hardware), and Splatoon was not a system-seller in the U.S. Also, simply being a critically-acclaimed game doesn't automatically make a title a system-seller. Many titles with a 90+ Metascore have failed to be system-sellers.

We still have the Gen VIII Pokemon game in the works, which will be a definite blockbusters, plus the likely Mario Kart 9 and Smash 5, and probably also price cuts and/or hardware revision in the future. The Switch's long-term sales are still up in the air, and I think it still has plenty of potential to outsell the 3DS. But for now, it's doing perfectly fine.

You're grasping at straws. The quote from the Resetera forum (from where we take the sales figure) puts PS4Pro sales, this November, at around 260,000 (or 65% less than the X). The X did better wether launches are aligned or not. And ultimately, isn't SONY responsible for managing the ill conceived launch of their own console? And what's with that 'The important thing is the X is not going to do what MS wanted it to do, reinvigorate XBO sales.' line? Are you really that emotionally invested in 'winning' the generation?

*Edited launch from lauch.

Exactly, the desperation is really palpable

Nah I said cash in their pocket, since they kept the price so high they get more revenues from it. And of course hardcore launch buyers will pay more so it was smart of them to keep the price high. Of course they will cut the price in a timely manner, just like Sony did with the Pro, but MS has more room to cut since it is already so high.

Hes been doing that since he joined. It was revealed that Switch was slightly under 300k in Oct so he went around saying it did under 290k. Then it was revealed it did 750-900k in November so obviously 750k is the number he uses.

Very reliable source said switch did over 2.5x October 750k-770k is the best number we have. with 750k being probably the closest, same source that leaked October's switch numbers.

So It was basically between 1.3 and 1.5 million. So u decide to go around saying it's only at 1.3 million. And you state it like it's a matter of fact.

the 1.5 million is for xbox one best month ever.

No it's not the best number you have.  Switch did well over 900K in November.  

the 1.5 million is for xbox one best month ever.

Dude stop making stuff up from your ass. everyone here knows, who john harker is, he's reliable and his source is trusted on vgchartz, and resetera.