By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - November 2017 NPD Thread! PS4 > XBO > Switch

thismeintiel said:
hudsoniscool said:

First of all a 2017 500$ console vs a 2019 400$ console won't be that big of a power difference. If it's 500$ sure it could be fairly large but 400 will probably be like the pro vs the x but roles reversed. And I think x would be 249-299 no higher than that.  The rate in which tech is increasing has slowed significantly. 

A 400$ console in 2019 would probably be a 9-10tf console with a ryzen CPU. The gpu would still be very comparable x to the ps5. There would be a very large difference in CPU though.

Nah, we're going to be getting something that has at least 2x the performance of the X's GPU.  Sony is going to want to be able to wow people with it being 2x+ more power than the X, which is supposed to be a beast.  And like you said, there is going to be a big difference between the Zen core CPU and the Jaguar cores found in the PS4/XBO.  Should see, at a minimum, 16 GB of GDDR6(X) RAM, maybe with 1-2 GB of DDR4 for the OS.  Sony's going to make sure they squeeze as much out of that $399 as possible.  Launching like they always do, taking a slight loss, but making up for it in game sales.

A 2018 ps5 at 399 would be about equivalent to the X. So a 2019 ps5 at 399 would only really have about 1 year of advancement. I think you overestimate the rate in which tech is advancing/coming down in price. I don't think ur putting in a 12tf gpu, with a good processor, and new expensive ram, then cooling all that tech inside a small box for 399 in 2019. To me what ur describing is either a 2019/2020 console at 499 or a 2020/ early 2021 console at 399.



Halo MCC will sell 5+ million copies(including digital)

halo 5 will sell 10 million copies(including digital)

x1 will pass ps4 in USA, and UK.

Around the Network
thismeintiel said:
jason1637 said:

The PS4 is still selling really well and the Pro came out last year. Its very possible 2018 could be the peak year and I don't know why Sony will cut the PS4s sales by going with a PS5 in 2019. I think the PS5 is a 2020 thing. Or even 2021.

You could ask yourself that same question for any of their consoles, really.  The answer is, they aren't cutting their sales short.  They are making sure the PS momentum continues.  As soon as interest starts to wane in the old console, then BAM! here's the new one.  Not only do the new systems sell well, but the old ones continue to sell well, too.  The PS1 still sold ~30M after the PS2 launched.  The PS2 sold 50M+ after the PS3 launched.  Again, the only outlier was the PS3. 

The reasons it didn't sell so well after the PS4 launched are many fold.  First, it wasn't quite the force the other PS systems were (which the PS4 is, again.)  Second, they weren't able to drop the price to $199 until after the PS4 launched, while the PS1 was $99 and the PS2 $129 when their successors were launched (the PS4 should at least be able to get down to $149.)  And third, the PS3 had an extended time on the market before the PS4 launched. If you the PS4 launched in 2012, and sales for the PS3 stayed similar, it would have done ~20M after the PS4 launched, as opposed to ~8M (I think Sony is going back to the model that worked best for them, a 6 year gen length.)

The fact is the people waiting to buy a PS4 at ~$149 are not the same people willing to buy a PS5 at $399.  I could see the PS4 easily hitting 20M+ after the PS5 launches, even if its in late 2019.

Not sure if the 5-6 year model is really better or not than 7 years, even more when we look at PS4Pro and PSVR to increase duration of the gen. PS3 was able to push a lot of SW even on its late life. So if PS3 being weaker than the other by having an extended life managed almost 90M LT and like 1B in SW, perhaps if it had a strong momentum and selling power as PS4 it would be even better and benefiting from longer life. This gen may answer that.

Noobie said:
DonFerrari said:

Yep, I  believe on a roughly 2 years after decline start for the next gen to launch... so 2020-2021 is my expectation as well, it will depend on how shap the decline become.

I believe Sony needs to fix the launch date before designing the components for their PS5. They can't build a system on components coming out in 2021 and then release the system in 2020 after a sudden drop in PS4. or build a system on components of 2018 and then delay it by a year or two if they find PS4 doing pretty well. 

Definitely they have some flexibility in extending the design by lot of things get built around the specification of the hardware like compilers, IDEs, debugging units, game engines. So we can all argue on when Sony will be launching the PS5 but i m quite certain that Sony by now must have finalized the release year and components of the system. 

Let me break it down a little since I didn't developed my point here as I done in other threads that were more about it.

The 2-3 years cycle to release after noticing a decline is like, PS5 have been under development ever since PS4 or at least PS4Pro released that is how it happens every single gen. They go for some years making some general aspects and power level they want for the next gen. When they have a precise perception of decline is when they will set the "final specs" that they will pass the next 12-18 months designing the the HW over, and on the next 12-18 months producing prototypes, dev kits, sending the specs to the devs to work on the next gen game, etc.

The reason we have games on the start of the gen even if it takes 2-3 years to dev a game is because they start deving a game before even knowing the spec of the next gen, but "gambling" on the likely ballpark of a system around 400-500USD (based on the price of PC components and the savings console makers do, and of course some dev for high level PC so that would be just a port) and when they get the dev kit is more final touchs and debbuging that they need to do to release.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

flashfire926 said:
DonFerrari said:

And I'm under the impression you never do bad comments about Sony right?

I make bad bad comments about each if I think they deserve it.

I see, you are another one of those self-called neutral and fair users on the site.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

hudsoniscool said:
thismeintiel said:

Nah, we're going to be getting something that has at least 2x the performance of the X's GPU.  Sony is going to want to be able to wow people with it being 2x+ more power than the X, which is supposed to be a beast.  And like you said, there is going to be a big difference between the Zen core CPU and the Jaguar cores found in the PS4/XBO.  Should see, at a minimum, 16 GB of GDDR6(X) RAM, maybe with 1-2 GB of DDR4 for the OS.  Sony's going to make sure they squeeze as much out of that $399 as possible.  Launching like they always do, taking a slight loss, but making up for it in game sales.

A 2018 ps5 at 399 would be about equivalent to the X. So a 2019 ps5 at 399 would only really have about 1 year of advancement. I think you overestimate the rate in which tech is advancing/coming down in price. I don't think ur putting in a 12tf gpu, with a good processor, and new expensive ram, then cooling all that tech inside a small box for 399 in 2019. To me what ur describing is either a 2019/2020 console at 499 or a 2020/ early 2021 console at 399.

I think you underestimate it.  Including how fast prices drop for components.  By the end of 2019, it will be quite easy to build something 2x the X, while taking a small loss on a $399 price.  Especially, when you consider the discount Sony gets on ordering mass parts.  And even more so when they can use the sales of the PS4 to barter for even better prices.  Something MS can't do.



thismeintiel said:
hudsoniscool said:

A 2018 ps5 at 399 would be about equivalent to the X. So a 2019 ps5 at 399 would only really have about 1 year of advancement. I think you overestimate the rate in which tech is advancing/coming down in price. I don't think ur putting in a 12tf gpu, with a good processor, and new expensive ram, then cooling all that tech inside a small box for 399 in 2019. To me what ur describing is either a 2019/2020 console at 499 or a 2020/ early 2021 console at 399.

I think you underestimate it.  Including how fast prices drop for components.  By the end of 2019, it will be quite easy to build something 2x the X, while taking a small loss on a $399 price.  Especially, when you consider the discount Sony gets on ordering mass parts.  And even more so when they can use the sales of the PS4 to barter for even better prices.  Something MS can't do.

And the fact that MS decided for high level components like the vapour chamber make the room for PS5 with standard components for a 2 year newer technology to be cheaper and more powerfull than X1X.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network

XOne and ps4 had great sales, ns is a little bit disapointing (perhaps because of the weak 3rd party lineup) . Another interesting point to see is that Xbox has got one exclusive in the top 10 while the ps4 top 10 is dominated by 3rd which the xbox has got also.

In this charts its looks like the xbox get sold because of its 1st party support xD^^



flashfire926 said:
quickrick said:

199$ ps4 sold out in 2 days. xbox one s family only did 1.3 million. xbox one s=870k.

You have any source saying it's 1.3m?

https://www.resetera.com/posts/2141920/



quickrick said:
flashfire926 said:

You have any source saying it's 1.3m?

https://www.resetera.com/posts/2141920/

It did more than 1.3m so we don't know of the 1S sold 970K.



quickrick said:
flashfire926 said:

You have any source saying it's 1.3m?

https://www.resetera.com/posts/2141920/

So It was basically between 1.3 and 1.5 million. So u decide to go around saying it's only at 1.3 million. And you state it like it's a matter of fact.



Halo MCC will sell 5+ million copies(including digital)

halo 5 will sell 10 million copies(including digital)

x1 will pass ps4 in USA, and UK.

hudsoniscool said:
quickrick said:

https://www.resetera.com/posts/2141920/

So It was basically between 1.3 and 1.5 million. So u decide to go around saying it's only at 1.3 million. And you state it like it's a matter of fact.

Hes been doing that since he joined. It was revealed that Switch was slightly under 300k in Oct so he went around saying it did under 290k. Then it was revealed it did 750-900k in November so obviously 750k is the number he uses.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.