Superman4 said:
Psyberius said:
Oh there's no doubt about that. Half of everything even at the beginning of the 19th century still considered slavery if not forcing people of different ethnicity into enclaves together and jobs that paid a fraction a white person would get.
Did Trump ever retract his not exactly condemnation in Charlottesville? Nope, not one single bit despite the damage what his words created. WHY? The Trumpbase wasn't really affected by him not condemning it...if anything there were more Trumpites with the white supremacists so he was just protecting his people.
|
Trumps comment was actually spot on. Not everyone in Charlottesville was a racist looking for violence. Yes you had some racists in the crowd that got the blood boiling of the counter protesters but it was the counter protesters that were infringing on the racists freedom of speech and expression. The hate is from both sides and it is what led to the end result, one of the racists driving their car through the crowd and killing someone. You had peaceful people on both sides of that protest and you had violent people on both sides. Don't forget it is the "non-racist" left that were the ones protesting and rioting when Trump won. They were the ones damaging property and assaulting people. They are also the ones that continue to riot and assault whenever someone from the right wants to speak.
|
LOL, as this article points out, Republicans conveniently love to ignore history when it suits their agenda. Clearly none of you remember the racist riots and attacks that broke out all across the country when Obama was elected in 2008 and re-elected in 2012 even in states where he won. Right-wingers torched a predominantly black church in Massachusetts FFS and assaulted Obama supporters left and right (no pun intended). And let's not forget Trump supporters have let out a wave of assaults against minorities since his election, who were no doubt emboldened by it. They even vandalized school property with racist graffiti after said attacks, you gonna bring THAT up? LOL, who'm I kiddin'? Of course not!
For somebody claiming to take the moral high ground, Trump sure seems awfully selective about who's first amendment rights he wants to respect (gee, I wonder why). We can decry blacks exercising their first amendment rights in the form of KNEELING until we're blue in the face, but God forbid anyone dare speak out against those poor, oppressed white nationalist lunatics marching through crowded streets with blow torches and assault rifles and shouting fascist, anti-Semitic drivel while clad in Nazi signs and outfits. Those poor white supremacists carrying body armor, helmets and firearms must've been petrified at them counter protesters coming at them with their cardboard signs!
Tell me: which side actually murdered people on the other side? Who was there inciting violence to begin with? Who actually beat and bloodied people on the other side with pipes? Who struck first? Answer to all: the Neo-Nazi, traitor-supporting scumbags (and yes, Robert E. Lee was, by definition, a traitor, deal with it). There's literally zero equivalence here, but yet Trump continued to make such equivalence where one clearly didn't exist even against his own party colleagues' insistence. He also pleaded and begged for his statue to remain despite the fact that it attracted said violence he claimed to oppose when there was literally 0 reason for it to exist on public property before this. It would be like Germany having a statue of Adolf Hitler or America having a King George statue, spare me the "deeeeeeey're remooveng hystury!" nonsense.