No idea, I just know the tests all show QLEDs have more color volume.

http://www.rtings.com/tv/learn/permanent-image-retention-burn-in-lcd-oled

Also, Zygote, OLED won't be taking over the market. Only two of the big four are doing it, and Sony may not do it again next year due to low sales of the A1E.

Really Azuren? What do you mean by color "volume" ? First time I hear about that. Color Gamut? Color Space? Fine. But Volume?

Also this:

https://www.digitaltrends.com/home-theater/qled-vs-oled-tv/

As per Rtings:

"What it is: How many colors a TV can display at different luminosity levels.

So it simply allows for more saturated colors at extreme brightness. Yet OLED TVs still take the crown when it comes to picture quality. Go figure?

As to your QLED tidbit, are you saying that an hypothetical tech that isn't remotely on the market is currently beating the picture quality of OLED TVs?

Sure enough, when it does comes out, it will be expensive, but also more than likely the better of the two tech. But until there's a consumer-ready set available, there's really no point in bringing this up in a thread where someone asks what he should get in the current age.

Your linked article actually mentions colour volume But yes, unless your living room is brightly lit while watching TV, it shouldn't be a problem.

Good point on the first link.  I didn't know burn-in had that level of potential for OLED.  Looking at the TV offerings this year, 4K tech has nearly become standard across the board.  It is possible that the manufacturers will focus on that market conversion over the next year, however OLED has such dramatic picture differences and has been touted for long enough that I find it hard to believe that all manufacturers will have some hat in that ring by next Christmas.  OLED may not win out completely in the end, but some form or evolution of that technology will be.  Might be best to hold off for a couple of years for gamers looks like though from that burn-in test. I was going to wait until next Christmas to get a main OLED, but we will see what happens this year with the tech.

Yes, they do. They also take the crown for burn-in and lost detail in blacks (OLED diodes on LG OLEDs turn off at 20cd/me, losing all detail that appears in that range).

My original mention of QLED was in reference to how OLED would never reach an acceptable state before it was beaten, and I thought that's what we were discussing. As far as picture quality now, there are four TVs from Sony alone that top out the Q9F, so it's not impressing anyone right now.

I would argue that something with a burn-in rate like OLED isn't consumer ready.

But you're making a bigger deal out of burn-in than it is.

From the link I shared:

SCREEN BURN-IN

"We include this section begrudgingly, both because burn-in is a misnomer (that’s just an aggravation) and, for most folks, the effect will not be an issue.

The effect we’ve come to know as burn-in stems from the days of the boxy CRT TV, when prolonged display of a static image would cause that image to appear to “burn” into the screen. What was actually taking place then was the phosphors that coated the back of the TV screen would glow for extended periods of time without any rest, causing the phosphors to wear out and create the appearance of a burned-in image. We think this should be called “burn out.” But … whatever.

That said, the potential is there, and it should be noted. Since QLED TVs aren’t susceptible to burn-in, they win this fight by technicality"