Hmm. Well, when you think about the art vs. money debate in video games, you really have to separate all the branches that help make it possible. As a publisher, it's almost entirely based on profits. They want to maximize their dollar as much as possible. As developers? That is totally different.

Let's think about Super Mario Bros and use it as an example. Do you think Miyamoto was only motivated by profit? Do you think he was motivated by profits at all? If you listen to his interviews then and now, it's clear that all this guy ever cared about was art and how best to convey it in video game form. His boss, on the other hand, Mr. Yamauchi, funded the project with the confidence that it would make a return on his investment. It was all about business and profit for the people who financed the games Miyamoto and his team made. 

So, really, it's not black and white. Even games like COD and Madden have a lot of people working on them that bleed for their work and do it because they just love doing it. There's a lot of cogs in this video game industry and they don't all have the same motives.

Certainly profit is not the only reason that games are made.  But, you seem to have agreed with my point.  Profit is always involved.  

"if we believe there's a ONE percent chance that he is our enemy we have to take it as an absolute certainty... and we have to destroy him."

I'm more of the mind that I'm not a mindless idiot and can support developers as they are good and if CDPR does shitty stuff at that time I can hate on them. For now, why should I not praise them for doing what we want?

What's wrong with that though? I'm sure a successful artist would state they enjoy the money and hobby as well. Any athlete would probably say the same thing as well. LeBron James wouldn't dedicate hours to basketball if he wasn't in the NBA, but I assure you he probably would still go to his local gym several times a week and hoop.

Profit should only be an issue if it affects the game negatively.