How much is this chip going to cost Sony/MS? How much would a comparable GPU to go with it cost them? Would a $400 next gen console in 2020 with this chip, 16 GB of RAM, and a comparable GPU be feasible? Would Sony/MS lose money on each console sale, or would they be able to make a small profit?

There wont be another Xbox

Well...... 14+ Teraflops PS5 is a lock then?

I think these chips are same size or smaller than the ones in the PS4... just its on 14nm.

So probably not that much, but this chip isnt for "next" gen.

Its a 15watt chip ment for ultra thin laptops.

The impressive thing is its a ryzen cpu that has a 1.6teraflop (less than PS4) gpu part...... for only 15watts.

Basically its much stronger than the chip inside the Nintendo Switch.

But it points to the CPU & GPU scaleing down really well, both Ryzen & Vega, power effecienty wise at low frenquencies.

A 3.5ghz+ ryzen part with atleast 8 threads for next gen, is basically something you can already assume will be in the PS5.

What would a chip like that cost Sony? Is there anything on the market now that compares to it? 

Haven't PS2 to PS3 been considered 30x leap?

8x is on paper, comparing FLOPS  - 10x is Sony's executive in one of the post shows after PS4 reveal - can't remember which one, it was really long time ago. But it makes sense, given that GCN is way more advanced than nVidia's 7800 which was in PS3.

So, with 8x on paper for 9th gen as well, it should be around 15TFLOPS - with a caveat that this time it will be 4x more pixels instead of 2.25x

Technically, yes. Compared to Xbox, as most powerful console of that gen, around 10x.

Perhaps Mark Cerny said it? Well I don't remember anyway. But seeing multiple sources on that I'll adhere to the 10X over.

Yep I remember something like PS3 being a 30x jump from PS2 and X360 a 13x jump from Xbox og... but that could been wrong.

It is actually 1.664 Teraflops.
640 shaders * 2 Instructions per clock * 1,300mhz clock = 1.664 Teraflops.

And this isn't a fully unlocked chip either, apparantly. A full chip has 11CU's.
11*64 = 704 * 2 Instructions per clock * 1,300mhz clock = 1.83 Teraflops.

HOWEVER. If the CPU is being taxed then the GPU will not be clocking that high as Power and Thermal limits come into play.

No. It couldn't.

No. It won't be. GDDR5 is old and outdated.
GDDR6 is the replacement.

You need a ton of bandwidth and fillrate for 4k... Even high-end PC GPU's with HBM2 and GDDR5X isn't a guarentee for 4k 60fps across every title.

Ryzen will be old and outdated by the time the Playstation 5 and Xbox 4 drops.

Microsoft and Sony will choose whatever CPU core is the most cost/energy and size efficient for their needs.
AMD should be iterating upon Ryzen on a yearly cadence going forward... So by 2020 we could have 7nm and Ryzen 3/4.

Bullshit.

Sony was never planning to use Haswell for the Playstation 4.

Sony never used AMD's Bulldozer for the Playstation 4.

With 16GB of main system ram being the sweet spot for PC right now in 2017, I would not be surprised if 24-32GB ends up being the target for next gen in 2019/2020.
By then I would expect 10nm DRAM chips to be the norm.

Looked at this last week. Very promising for a mobile/portable version of the PS4 in the future.

This a long way from PS5 though. We need 20+ Tflops, 64+ GB of RAM, and at least an 8TB SSD for PS5. It shouldn't come out until 2021 - 2023 whrn this is viable. A PS4 Premium that offers current gen games in 4K in 2019 would be a better move.

SSD tech is going to go under the price of HDD by the mid 2020's. If we get PS5 in 2019 based on ~12 Tflops, 16GB of RAM, and HDD tech is will be extreamly outdated within months.

This all bodes well for scalability, which I have been saying is key going forward. Ryzen and Vega are already proving their scaling capability, and Zen+ and Navi are going to push this even further.