Quantcast
Super Mario Odyssey Reviews - 97 Metacritic (91 Reviews) - 97 OpenCritic (84 Reviews)

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Super Mario Odyssey Reviews - 97 Metacritic (91 Reviews) - 97 OpenCritic (84 Reviews)

In just all around amazed how good this year has been for Nintendo fans. Mario, Metroid, and Zelda. The Trinity.



Twitter: @d21lewis  --I'll add you if you add me!!

Around the Network
palou said:
Shikamo said:

Metacritic: http://www.metacritic.com/game/switch/super-mario-odyssey?ref=hp

OpenCritic: http://opencritic.com/game/4504/super-mario-odyssey

Reviews Posted:

Edge Magazine: 10/10 

Famitsu: 10/10/9/10 = 39/40

A random newspaper (independan.ie) also broke the embargo - gave it 120% (6 out of 5), lol

 

They removed it - but can still be found in cached form on google

Lol, I saw it. I wonder if the Metascore would be 120 or 100. And if they even have the possibility of register a 120 as a score in the page XD.



My pitchfork is sharpened, ready to attack anyone who scored the game less than 9/10.

Prepare your anus, Jim.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Seem set for high scores



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

vivster said:
My pitchfork is sharpened, ready to attack anyone who scored the game less than 9/10.

Be careful of a certain absurdous fast user... you can't use your pitchfork if you haven't played the game to the end.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
vivster said:
My pitchfork is sharpened, ready to attack anyone who scored the game less than 9/10.

Be careful of a certain absurdous fast user... you can't use your pitchfork if you haven't played the game to the end.

It's not like you have to actually play Nintendo games to know that they're the best thing on earth. And if you played them and and still don't think they're the best then obviously you did something wrong because so many great reviews cannot possibly be wrong.

Not that I will have a lot of time swinging, I'm already preloading Assassin's Creed Origins.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Anything less than a 95 would be a disaster.



Time to find out if anyone gives it a troll score for views...... or it doesnt get one, and keeps a 95 Metacrtic score?



I think it will get a 94, I definitely think more people will potentially hesitate to give a platformer full marks as opposed to a game like Zelda. So it might get dragged down slightly by a load of 9s



JRPGfan said:
Time to find out if anyone gives it a troll score for views...... or it doesnt get one, and keeps a 95 Metacrtic score?

It's sad that a score different than what the hivemind thinks is automatically deemed a troll. The review itself should also be taken into account, and if they bring up valid points on why they scored the game the way they did, then it's just an honest opinion that happens to be unpopular.