By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Xbox One X Shadow of War shows profound improvements over PS4 Pro

SvennoJ said:
I was in the same boat at you. Can't stream 4K consistently (Netflix still regularly drops to dvd quality on my connection), not interested in paying the premium on 4K UHD discs as I'm not double dipping again for minor benefits (nothing like dvd to blu-ray) and new movies are kinda lacking. Plus sound options are exactly the same on blu and 4k versions, and I would actually have to downgrade to lossy 5.1 if I want to watch 4K UHD (hdmi 1.4 amp) As for games, I mostly game in VR nowadays.


However my old tv broke, good 1080 tvs are extinct, and I value black level more than anything when buying a new set. Since OLED is still bloody expensive for 65" I got a good HDR set with local dimming and great black level. 65" however is still a it small to really notice 4K resolution unless you stand right in front of it. What does make all the difference in HDR and good use of wide color. GT Sport looks phenomenal. I was a skeptic at first and even though HZD looks great in 4K HDR, the upgrade is not that profound to use DF's terminology.  GT Sport however is the killer app for HDR atm, color use and lighting are tailor made for HDR sets. The difference between GT Sport on my 1080p projector and 4K HDR set is night and day. It's displaying shades of colors I've never seen come out a tv before. Rebuilding the game from the ground up with bt.2020 color space in mind was worth it.

Yet talk about niche, one game that makes full use of the new 4K HDR sets, a game that's lacking content and is marred by always online requirement.

Is it good enough to abandon my projector and park my chair in front of the tv to play GT Sport, you betcha.
Is it good enough to spend CAD 600 on an XBox One X, nah. I'll be back to VR when Skyrim comes out.

Anyway if your current tv is still fine, just wait until full HDR sets become more affordable and maybe HDMI 2.1 will be out by then (for variable frame rates like g-sync) The bits of 4K video content I managed to watch on the tv look nice, not worth the upgrade though.


Yeah, a friend of mine bought a 4K TV last year and while the difference was noticeable while watching it was nowhere near the jump from 480p to 720p/1080p. As you said, you need a big TV to appreciate the difference - which reminds me that I'll also need a new shelf as my current 47" TV is almost too big already. I do appreciate HDR though, I think color vibrancy is one of the most important things when it comes to displays. For now, I'm happy with my PS4 Slim and 1080p content and I'll probably wait for the next generation of consoles to arrive before I make the jump to 4K. It feels a bit like back in 2005/2006 when Sony and Microsoft were heavily pushing HD gaming but only 1/10 households actually owned an HD TV: The time is just not right yet if you are not a tech enthusiast. But of course, when I feel the itch to buy a new TV it'll be a 4K model.



Around the Network
Aeolus451 said:
jason1637 said:

The first game you had to grind to many hours. Also it's not as bad as you make it out to be. Mordor is around 23 hours to beat the story and extras https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=18006 .

Shadow of War is 35 hours to beat the game and extras. https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=44022

You can play the game  without lootboxes and without hundreds of hours of grinding. 

True but that's not why people are making a fuss over loot boxes. Ya ever hear of that saying "give an inch and they'll take a mile"? People want to stop it before it gets worse. 

Here's where activsion is playing around with matchmaking algorithms that pit noob players against experienced players with the goal of them hopefully buying in-game items with money. 

 

"For instance, the microtransaction engine may match a more expert/marquee player with a junior player to encourage the junior player to make game-related purchases of items possessed/used by the marquee player. A junior player may wish to emulate the marquee player by obtaining weapons or other items used by the marquee player.”

The system looks at players’ profiles to determine their specific playstyles. One example given by the patent is that a player who has shown a proclivity towards sniper rifles will be paired with a player who is proficient with this type of weapon. The novice player may then be influenced to purchase the sniper rifle (and gear) used by the expert player. After this purchase, the player would then be placed in a match where sniper rifles are advantageous, thus encouraging future purchases."

https://www.geek.com/games/activision-patents-matchmaking-algorithm-to-make-players-spend-money-1719969/

 

It's just better to nip this kind of shit in the butt instead of ignoring this kind of crap til it's too imbedded into the games to reverse it. As soon as they push for an itch, raise some hell. 

I don't agree with the way Activision has handled microtransactions but it's different from how Shadow of War has done it. I'm okay with the way Shadow of war does it but if somehow they make it worse then yeah I'll call BS on that.

Nem said:
jason1637 said:

The first game you had to grind to many hours. Also it's not as bad as you make it out to be. Mordor is around 23 hours to beat the story and extras https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=18006 .

Shadow of War is 35 hours to beat the game and extras. https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=44022

You can play the game  without lootboxes and without hundreds of hours of grinding. 

Not if you want the true ending. Thats not true.

Honestly, just stop. It disgusts me to see people defend these trash companies on their BS.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-10-20-shadow-of-war-the-shadow-wars-explained-how-to-get-true-ending-complete-endgame-4823

You don't need to buy anything to get the true ending.

Shadow of Wars microtransactions are not BS because you can play the game regularly without it and it doesn't take much longer to beat it.

If microtransactions are like CoD then I won't defend 6hat but there isn't anything wrong with the way they are handled in Shadow of War.



Nem said:
jason1637 said:

The first game you had to grind to many hours. Also it's not as bad as you make it out to be. Mordor is around 23 hours to beat the story and extras https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=18006 .

Shadow of War is 35 hours to beat the game and extras. https://howlongtobeat.com/game.php?id=44022

You can play the game  without lootboxes and without hundreds of hours of grinding. 

Not if you want the true ending. Thats not true.

Honestly, just stop. It disgusts me to see people defend these trash companies on their BS.

Just want to point that Brandon (from Easy Allies) beat the game with not touching the lootboxes :s;






SvennoJ said:
DonFerrari said:

In Brazil they ask for over 25Mbps for 4k streaming, but there isn't that much good content anyway....

I play at under 6ft of my 65" so It almost use all my vision area =]

Yesterday I showed my wife the heaviest screen saver I ever had, GTS beta with 45 Gb of data and now only working as screen saver kkk, she was quite impressed.

About the never seem colors... I fall in love with my TV when I first hooked it up and gone to YT and put the Sony 4K demo... even coming out of YT and not having full HDR it looked fantastic... The animals and landscapes looked surreal.

I was wondering how you were playing the GT Sport beta last night! I leave the game on as well, great HDR screensaver when idle.

I did the same thing when I got the tv, watch the 4k store demos on you tube. They Look great in slow movement (otherwise I get too many compression artifacts), however those videos are heavily processed to make these tvs look good, they made planet earth 2 look a bit pedestrian. (which looks great as well, but real instead of surreal)

Here Netflix detected my tv and immediately wanted me to upgrade to 4K for $5 a month extra. I checked my to watch list, nothing in it has 4K afaik and certainly not HDR. Plus I'm watching 7 seasons of DS9 atm, in 4:3 SD from the 90's... And my connection still occasionally strugles with that :(

I just entered to see if I could at least use photography mode or see the cars (like the Ferarri and Toyota) to see their colors. No luck.

I don't mind the heavily processed, I wanted the eye candy =p

I don't think the netflix offered me the 4K, but when I looked for it I got the offer to upgrade, done it and then it started having issues to keep connected (TV wasn't accepting the Netflix) and was due to having a 15Mbps connection.

But on 50Mbps I hardly have issues to stream 4k.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

 

The drops to the 20ies in FPS are a sign why this thing will fail imho. In all their hunt for glorious ‘true’ 4K Microsoft have forgotten to optimise the console’s CPU in order to handle all that data load that comes with high res 4K textures. It’s just not a balanced system. You’d need to be a hardcore Microsoft fan to buy this thing for 500 now, when a much more powerful and optimised PS5 is around the corner. They overshot imho. Curious how a 350 PS4 Pro is going to sell against a 500 X1X. I expect the X1X to drop to 399,- by end of next year, maybe even 349,-

 

NATO said:

I wish they would make a game that actually uses the power rather than just showboating old titles nobody cares about anymore, "hey everyone, it turns out having more ram allows you to use high resolution textures!!"

Has anyone bothered to give Microsoft a nudge and tell them that it wasn't, and never has been the lack of power thats been hurting their sales? and releasing such a hefty console so far into the gen is only going to hurt them in the future, PS5 drops and it's a significant improvement over PS4/Pro, the next xbox drops and it's only a minor improvement over the Xbox one X, who is going to get the sales?, that leaves Microsoft in the awkward position where they either go all out again for a bigger jump, then get stung on unit price, or grin and bear it and release something only moderately better, at which point people arent going to see the value in upgrading and instead get the PS5 or the older (and likely by that point, cheaper) Xbox One X.

 

Pretty much this. Sales haven’t been dropping because of the low power but because of the lack of support and first of all games. I mean..just look at the Switch!



Around the Network
konnichiwa said:
Nem said:

Not if you want the true ending. Thats not true.

Honestly, just stop. It disgusts me to see people defend these trash companies on their BS.

Just want to point that Brandon (from Easy Allies) beat the game with not touching the lootboxes :s;

We already knew that. It's the true ending that was behind the lootboxes, unless they backtracked on that. But i havent heard anything about it.



Louie said:

Yeah, a friend of mine bought a 4K TV last year and while the difference was noticeable while watching it was nowhere near the jump from 480p to 720p/1080p. As you said, you need a big TV to appreciate the difference - which reminds me that I'll also need a new shelf as my current 47" TV is almost too big already. I do appreciate HDR though, I think color vibrancy is one of the most important things when it comes to displays. For now, I'm happy with my PS4 Slim and 1080p content and I'll probably wait for the next generation of consoles to arrive before I make the jump to 4K. It feels a bit like back in 2005/2006 when Sony and Microsoft were heavily pushing HD gaming but only 1/10 households actually owned an HD TV: The time is just not right yet if you are not a tech enthusiast. But of course, when I feel the itch to buy a new TV it'll be a 4K model.

You probably won't have a choice anymore between 1080p or 4K. I tried to find a good 1080p set, doesn't exist here anymore. There are still budget 1080p tvs but if you want good color and black level, stay away from those. But indeed the jump is far smaller than dvd to blu-ray. What you do get with 4K uhd is less compression artifacts. On a 4K set they do become more noticeable, also with blu-ray.
And no matter how great the tv is, most of our tv viewing is still cable, which comes in at ~7mbps mpeg-2 720p/1080i 8 bit 4:2:0 chroma subsampling.  The tv renders all the macroblocking quite clearly lol.



DonFerrari said:
ironmanDX said:

I wonder if the upcoming revision of the PS4 pro hardware will change that. They've had the pro out in the wild for a while now.

Well, we all expected sony would release some of the 3Gb of RAM they reserved for the OS in the start of the gen and it didn't happen, so I don't think this will change. Considering my UI is already slow as fuck but I care much more about the game I'm playing I would love base PS4 get 7Gb to games and PS4Pro 8 Gb or close to it even if the UI need to be simplified and less pretty. But we know several users will complain about it.

But perhaps now with X1X having 9Gb for gaming Sony will move to release a little more RAM to help PS4Pro on the 4k aspect.

Slownenberg said:
I find it hilarious that anyone would care about those differences. I mean as a developer/artist working on the game sure they should be proud. But as a gamer...who cares?! They both have advanced graphics, one has a little bit more detailed graphics. Won't affect gameplay at all.

We gamers are suckers for eyecandy, I'm sure I'm. So even minute differences are talked a lot.

Aeolus451 said:

True but that's not why people are making a fuss over loot boxes. Ya ever hear of that saying "give an inch and they'll take a mile"? People want to stop it before it gets worse. 

Here's where activsion is playing around with matchmaking algorithms that pit noob players against experienced players with the goal of them hopefully buying in-game items with money. 

"For instance, the microtransaction engine may match a more expert/marquee player with a junior player to encourage the junior player to make game-related purchases of items possessed/used by the marquee player. A junior player may wish to emulate the marquee player by obtaining weapons or other items used by the marquee player.”

The system looks at players’ profiles to determine their specific playstyles. One example given by the patent is that a player who has shown a proclivity towards sniper rifles will be paired with a player who is proficient with this type of weapon. The novice player may then be influenced to purchase the sniper rifle (and gear) used by the expert player. After this purchase, the player would then be placed in a match where sniper rifles are advantageous, thus encouraging future purchases."

https://www.geek.com/games/activision-patents-matchmaking-algorithm-to-make-players-spend-money-1719969/

It's just better to nip this kind of shit in the butt instead of ignoring this kind of crap til it's too imbedded into the games to reverse it. As soon as they push for an itch, raise some hell. 

Very dirt move to make noob go against top to face countless frustration and entice the buying of things that won't really help his skills.... love the system GTS will use that take your level and qualification time to make a close matchmaking, most fighting and FPS games with levels do similar things... Activision is really going out of their way to nick and dime the players.

I hope that activision doesn't go through with it otherwise new players won't likely be playing their games after the game gets established.



Aeolus451 said:
DonFerrari said:

Well, we all expected sony would release some of the 3Gb of RAM they reserved for the OS in the start of the gen and it didn't happen, so I don't think this will change. Considering my UI is already slow as fuck but I care much more about the game I'm playing I would love base PS4 get 7Gb to games and PS4Pro 8 Gb or close to it even if the UI need to be simplified and less pretty. But we know several users will complain about it.

But perhaps now with X1X having 9Gb for gaming Sony will move to release a little more RAM to help PS4Pro on the 4k aspect.

We gamers are suckers for eyecandy, I'm sure I'm. So even minute differences are talked a lot.

Very dirt move to make noob go against top to face countless frustration and entice the buying of things that won't really help his skills.... love the system GTS will use that take your level and qualification time to make a close matchmaking, most fighting and FPS games with levels do similar things... Activision is really going out of their way to nick and dime the players.

I hope that activision doesn't go through with it otherwise new players won't likely be playing their games after the game gets established.

I rarely play Activision games, but liked the initial game. Well for all I care they can go blazing guns with the model, bankrupt and show to all companies that they shouldn't do it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."