Azuren said: Not upset by the score, as it seems to be game reviewers upset that there was less "game" than competitors like Forza, Driveclub, and Mario Kart. The thing about that is it's not a very good way to judge GT. It's less game and more simulator, so of course it won't be as objectively fun because that was never its mission. Its mission was to be "real". |
My friend think it is objective to say "GT is a better simulator than FM, but FM is more fun. So as a simulator I think FM is better"
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."