By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - First Super Mario Odyssey Review in! (EDGE)

KLXVER said:
guiduc said:

Who said we were bothered?

Enough to try and discredit the argument it looks like.

I think you're being too serious about this. We are actually having fun here and couldn't care less about these conspiracy theories. And no reviewer is fail-safe, I grant you that.

Let's relax and wait up until October 27th.



Around the Network
irstupid said:
KLXVER said:

Why does it bother you guys SO much when someone question Nintendo...or EDGE I guess? Just because you trust them 100% doesnt mean everyone do.

This isn't about trusting Edge or Nintendo, this is about having absolutely no reason to put any value in what some random dude at Forbes said.

Ok, so you tell me why SMO got reviewed in EDGE early when we cant seem to find any Nintendo game that didnt get a perfect 10 getting early reviews before then? Is it just coincidence? Zelda also got an early review, yet not a single other launch title on the Switch got a review in that issue. Just the perfect 10 title. They had time to review a 40 hour plus title, but not the mini game compilation 1 2 Switch.

So yeah, I think the guy has a point.

 



guiduc said:
ThisGuyFooks said:

Conspiracy Theory much?

The game most certainly is amazing, why complicate things?

I was being so self-evident, you should have known I was joking around . After all, I'm talking with Rol.

Same comment goes for Naum

Oh!



KLXVER said:
irstupid said:

This isn't about trusting Edge or Nintendo, this is about having absolutely no reason to put any value in what some random dude at Forbes said.

Ok, so you tell me why SMO got reviewed in EDGE early when we cant seem to find any Nintendo game that didnt get a perfect 10 getting early reviews before then? Is it just coincidence? Zelda also got an early review, yet not a single other launch title on the Switch got a review in that issue. Just the perfect 10 title. They had time to review a 40 hour plus title, but not the mini game compilation 1 2 Switch.

So yeah, I think the guy has a point.

 

Mate the's reaching and then the's what you're peddling, the two games that got 10s one got the most 10s on MC the other is looking to do the same in order for your argument to be valid you first have to explain why the game doesn't deserve a 10 if you can't do that then your whole argument falls apart and is just a baseless rant.

Both Zelda and Mario are big momentum titles so getting a copy out to big outlet like Edge for their October issue which is out a week before the game's launch is simple business thinking much like with BOTW.



KLXVER said:
irstupid said:

This isn't about trusting Edge or Nintendo, this is about having absolutely no reason to put any value in what some random dude at Forbes said.

Ok, so you tell me why SMO got reviewed in EDGE early when we cant seem to find any Nintendo game that didnt get a perfect 10 getting early reviews before then? Is it just coincidence? Zelda also got an early review, yet not a single other launch title on the Switch got a review in that issue. Just the perfect 10 title. They had time to review a 40 hour plus title, but not the mini game compilation 1 2 Switch.

So yeah, I think the guy has a point.

 

Maybe, just maybe, Nintendo only sends a game early when they're extremely confident in its quality? You don't think that's more likely than Nintendo and EDGE committing a federal crime that could cost them millions of dollars and the complete destruction of their consumer trust?



Around the Network
StarDoor said:
KLXVER said:

Ok, so you tell me why SMO got reviewed in EDGE early when we cant seem to find any Nintendo game that didnt get a perfect 10 getting early reviews before then? Is it just coincidence? Zelda also got an early review, yet not a single other launch title on the Switch got a review in that issue. Just the perfect 10 title. They had time to review a 40 hour plus title, but not the mini game compilation 1 2 Switch.

So yeah, I think the guy has a point.

 

Maybe, just maybe, Nintendo only sends a game early when they're extremely confident in its quality? You don't think that's more likely than Nintendo and EDGE committing a federal crime that could cost them millions of dollars and the complete destruction of their consumer trust?

It would cost them millions of dollars to say "You can release the review early because you gave it a perfect 10"?



Wyrdness said:
KLXVER said:

Ok, so you tell me why SMO got reviewed in EDGE early when we cant seem to find any Nintendo game that didnt get a perfect 10 getting early reviews before then? Is it just coincidence? Zelda also got an early review, yet not a single other launch title on the Switch got a review in that issue. Just the perfect 10 title. They had time to review a 40 hour plus title, but not the mini game compilation 1 2 Switch.

So yeah, I think the guy has a point.

 

Mate the's reaching and then the's what you're peddling, the two games that got 10s one got the most 10s on MC the other is looking to do the same in order for your argument to be valid you first have to explain why the game doesn't deserve a 10 if you can't do that then your whole argument falls apart and is just a baseless rant.

Both Zelda and Mario are big momentum titles so getting a copy out to big outlet like Edge for their October issue which is out a week before the game's launch is simple business thinking much like with BOTW.

So October 12th is one week before SMOs launch now?



Just to muddy the waters further, i have been looking for a physical copy of said magazine but it is sold out everywhere! It seems even the article from whence this discussion came from is also in high demand!



Peach_buggy said:
Just to muddy the waters further, i have been looking for a physical copy of said magazine but it is sold out everywhere! It seems even the article from whence this discussion came from is also in high demand!

Order it from their site then...



KLXVER said:
Wyrdness said:

Mate the's reaching and then the's what you're peddling, the two games that got 10s one got the most 10s on MC the other is looking to do the same in order for your argument to be valid you first have to explain why the game doesn't deserve a 10 if you can't do that then your whole argument falls apart and is just a baseless rant.

Both Zelda and Mario are big momentum titles so getting a copy out to big outlet like Edge for their October issue which is out a week before the game's launch is simple business thinking much like with BOTW.

So October 12th is one week before SMOs launch now?

My mistake 2, point still stands.