There are even times when no one fixes anything. It's still incredibly lazy of them and they should be called out for it.

Those are minimum things expected from almost all PC games, and for a good reason. They're usually very easy to implement but they can improve the experience by quite a bit. Not adding them is simply lazy and unexcusable. At the very least, you should be able to select the resolution from a list of the most common resolutions instead of just choosing between, say, 1080p and 4k. Other resolutions are pretty common in monitors, and not offering the possibility to use the monitor's native resolution makes the whole game look blurrier.

Are you trying to misunderstand deliberately or are you really that ignorant about PC gaming? There's some basic stuff that's expected from pretty much every game, such as being able to fully customize controls. Keyboards are different from controllers, and people have many more different preferences for how to control games using keyboard. Sometimes it's hard to get the controls right for everyone even when everyone's using identical controllers, let alone when most people are using a keyboard that has a ton more buttons than a simple controller. Then there's the issue of graphical settings as well. Adding support for stuff like setting AA level, V-Sync toggle, framerate limiting, and all that stuff, is usually very simple, so why not add that? In a well designed engine, the hardest part should be adding the menu functionality for changing those things - and not actually implementing the customizations. If you can't even bother to work a bit on a simple menu after spending a substantial effort on the more technical issues, you're doing something wrong.

It's not literally unplayable so some people are going to be satisfied provided it runs well. 

The main problem is that it's almost unheard of (unless you happen to be KT) to launch a PC port in 2017 and not provide the most basic of options, like being able to freely choose your resolution or just basic graphics options (texture quality, lighting, etc.). It looks bad on KT for not making the effort, which is a shame because NiOh is a great game and KT's laziness may turn some people off.

How is Zkuq, let alone myself jumping at their throats?.

KT has a known track record of dishing out spotty port jobs, same goes for bamco and at times SE as well. It's not jumping at the throat to expect basic features to be implimented and not screwing up the port job. Pointing out past laziness isn't grabbing the fire and pitchforks either. Threatening them and their families is though.

Edit: just to show what I'm on about:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1438104

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1322148&page=1

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1379328

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1175222

I'm not jumping at anyone's throat. BraLoD said we should be happy if it's exactly the same as the PC version, and I explained why that's not the case. Basically I'm talking in general and not specifically about this game. I imagine KT doesn't have a good track record with ports though, so my expectations aren't high, but I'm reserving my final judgement until I know better.

While we're on about KT, look at what Bamco has been pulling;

Half of it's options menu does nothing btw.

I guess the illusion of choice works on some.

It's a hard game and it's fun to play. The weapons are pretty cool and I like the theme of it.

They are wrong.

But good news for PC only gamers. Its a great game whether you like Dark Souls and Devil May Cry, it is a bit like both.

Personally I'm waiting for a full version of the game with the DLC's for my PS4. Not only will I get the full version but at the best price hopefully as the longer one waits the lower the price.