CGI-Quality said:
Although there are still plenty of people who want multiple GPUs, you misunderstood the thread title. Time for a change. |
Sorry I just saw 1 and then 2 and then 3 gpus. They were breeding very quickly.
CGI-Quality said:
Although there are still plenty of people who want multiple GPUs, you misunderstood the thread title. Time for a change. |
Sorry I just saw 1 and then 2 and then 3 gpus. They were breeding very quickly.
fatslob-:O said:
No reason for AMD to maintain the burden of mGPU performance ... (there's an API in the driver which will automatically take advantage of mGPU if the game makes use of the said API) |
Sure there is. There is zero guarantee developers will even bother to support the technology... Plus we can't forget the plethora of currently released games either.
fatslob-:O said:
Not like Linux matters much anyways once we consider it's terrible graphics architecture ... (Linux is unbelievably so far behind in comparison to Windows 10 with WDDM 2.3.1) The statement that AMD is 'too cheap and lazy to support anything older than a 460' is not even remotely true and is just so wrong on many levels since their proprietary Linux driver supports architectures that are half a decade old (GCN 1st gen), it's the same for their Windows drivers too! ('Too cheap and lazy' are words that would describe Intel when they have a total equity that's over 100x bigger than AMD and yet they refuse to support hardware that's older than 2 generations in their proprietary Linux drivers and their graphics chips is the most prevalent of them all in PCs.) |
Indeed. Linux is a dead platform as far as gaming is concerned... The main extent of Linux gaming is essentially WINE (Running windows games) and a few occassional ports.
Supporting Radeon 6000/5000/4000/3000/2000 is a pointless affair anyway... They aren't great GPU's for gaming anymore.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--