oh come on.....  hardly anything that looks like doom is 60 FPS, even on the PS4.  This is going to be the shining example of what can be accomplished on Switch.

Why are you talking about nintendo fans on a doom thread? Im just talking about people who play games like you know 80% of the market share who arent geeky enough to really care about fps

Glad to see the confirmation and that the DF guy was right with his impression. I guess id would've done a better job at porting their own game, but even they wouldn't get it to run at 60FPS without decreasing picture quality even more.

It is still the only version of doom you can play on the train.

I agree with this.

Don't feed the troll! Everybody knows that many, if not most, of the games on PS4/XB1 are 30 fps too. ;)

So you're saying if Doom launched on Xbox One at 30fps and at 60fps on PS4 people wouldn't be mad? Obviously there's a reason it's 30fps on Switch and that's fine but pretending like that's not an important distinction to a lot of people is just lol. 

Most of the people i work with, socialise with, who game, Wouldnt even know there was a differance between the two versions that what im trying to say.

But yeah pretty sure soon woth Xb1X there is gonna be a big differance in the two consoles. Dont mean shit though, to the average consumer playstation is where its at.

The differnce between the XB1s (~1.4 Tflop) and the PS4s (~1.84 Tflop) is like 32%.

The PS4 is perphaps 4 times as powerfull as the switch..... 4 times.... thats 400%, theres too big a gap.

There has to be sacrifices to run 3rd party games when they are as demanding as doom is.

But perpetuating the whole "60fps is not important, only geeks believe that!" thing is so dumb and just because you or your friends don't get it doesn't mean the difference in quality isn't becoming more recognized. And to be clear the difference is *massive*, you can tell just by looking at the video how slow it is.