If there is any graphical difference, I cant see it.I mean, the lightining may be slightly better on the other platform, but thats it.

Kudos 2K!

I'm sure you're right but I can't tell. They're close enough for me!

Impressive. I haven't bought a basketball game since NBA2K6 on 360. So I'm unlikely to pick this up, but if I do. It would be the Switch version.

Amazed that playing this on a tablet anywhere can be compared with consoles 8x its size.

You can clearly see a difference when comparing the versions side by side. Thus you wouldn't noticed the difference much without comparision besides lower textures and 30 fps. Most people probably don't even care. From what I've seen it still looks very acceptable and you can take the game where ever you go for ffs.
That's the milestone here.

Unless you are running them side by side on a 55inch screen a meter away you probably won't notice tbh

After all he objective of the game is to play not stand and zoom in on a players face lol.

Yeah, but it's close enough and understandable at the same time. I would have preferred 60FPS, but seeing that it kind of struggles during cutscenes, well, that's kind of a stretch. 

I find storage management to be more annoying. 5GB are required just for save data, and that must go to the system memory yes or yes, and given the console just has 32GB, well, that's a blow, especially if you get interested in future games that also demand big installations. 

They look almost  same .

They look remarkably close considering we're comparing consoles to a handheld device.

Considering the Switch version is the only portable one with local multiplayer on the go, it looks the best to me :)

Seriously though, aside from better lighting and textures during closeups on character models, there's no major discernible difference between the Switch version and the other two.