bigtakilla said:
All the reason to stop sitting on this. |
Again, if they nuke someone, there goes their whole deterrent.
bigtakilla said:
All the reason to stop sitting on this. |
Again, if they nuke someone, there goes their whole deterrent.
VGPolyglot said:
Again, if they nuke someone, there goes their whole deterrent. |
And there goes a lot of lives. Is it worth the risk?
bigtakilla said:
And there goes a lot of lives. Is it worth the risk? |
So, the solution is to do something that we know will cause in a lot of lives lost in order to avoid a possibility of there being lives lost?
VGPolyglot said:
So, the solution is to do something that we know will cause in a lot of lives lost in order to avoid a possibility of there being lives lost? |
That's the ethical question. We cost a lot of lives, but only the smallest fraction compared to what may happen. Let's say NK does for whatever reason fire a nuke. Then what do we do? Hope they only got one? Shoot one back? How many will die from starvarion and relocation as well as nuclear fallout?
bigtakilla said:
That's the ethical question. We cost a lot of lives, but only the smallest fraction compared to what may happen. Let's say NK does for whatever reason fire a nuke. Then what do we do? Hope they only got one? Shoot one back? How many will die from starvarion and relocation as well as nuclear fallout? |
And my response is that it's not worth the loss of life to do so.
VGPolyglot said:
And my response is that it's not worth the loss of life to do so. |
Then you are willing to put literally millions of peoples lives at risk of nuclear attack than sacrifice a couple hundred thousand to ensure that never happens (because let's face it, it isn't WWII where we bomb cities anymore. That's not how wars are fought in 2017.)
bigtakilla said:
Then you are willing to put literally millions of peoples lives at risk of nuclear attack than sacrifice a couple hundred thousand to ensure that never happens (because let's face it, it isn't WWII where we bomb cities anymore. That's not how wars are fought in 2017.) |
The US bombs constantly. What do you mean we don't fight wars like that anymore?
VGPolyglot said:
The US bombs constantly. What do you mean we don't fight wars like that anymore? |
Not cities full of civilians.
bigtakilla said:
Not cities full of civilians. |
So, how would they get to Kim Jong-un then?
VGPolyglot said:
So, how would they get to Kim Jong-un then? |
Same way we got Osama Bin Laden. Hell, he's in parades all the time.