By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo was never doomed

Jedidiah-Rose said:
You'd be hard pressed to say Nintendo is ever doomed for all the reasons you stated and more, but they do seem to be going through more and more bad phases with their hardware since the 2000, to deny just how dire the competitiveness of Nintendo through Gen6 and Gen8 was can be an issue, particularly if their means of addressing any long term concerns is by continuously gimmicking their systems out, which doesn't always hit, ala WiiU. With portable platforms on the decrease as well, I wonder how long the Switch will last on it's current success.

There could be a time in the not to distant future where Nintendo become solely publishers of their IP's, not in the sorry way it happened to Sega, I imagine were it to happen for Nintendo it would be on their terms.

Even in gens where nintnedo has lost they've more often than not turned profit. It's deceptive because of how badly they lose sometimes. They keep their tech affordable and profitable from day one. I doubt they spend As much as their competitors on ips. The switch will make shareholders happy. Nintnedo is only growing.



Around the Network
Pyro as Bill said:
Mr Puggsly said:

I never though Nintendo was doomed because handheld was always going strong.

BUT, their home devices are kinda only 3 of their homes consoles were a big success in my opinion. NES, SNES, and Wii. N64 was a huge decline, Gamecube was an even bigger decline, and in a post Wii world they dropped the ball with Wii U which was their great failure in my opinion (albeit having some very notable software).

We're technically at a point where Nintendo home consoles no longer exist. I know people will Switch is a home console console, but its built as a portable device first because that's where Nintendo does best. Nintendo no longer competes head on with Sony and MS because they can't.

Open world (Zelda), online shooter (Splatoon) and motion control fighter (ARMS) at $60 aren't exactly the traditional Nintendo handheld lineup, are they?

The bar has been going up and up on what expect from handheld games. Especially post PSP, 3DS, Vita, and smart devices. Over a decade ago we had console-esque GTA on a portable device.

While the Switch fills the void of a traditional home consoles, it was built for portability. Frankly, I'm happy all the major companies are basically focused on one device now and the traditional home console market is covered by MS, Sony, and technially PC.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

It should be noted that at points this week, Nintendo was actually valued higher on the stock market than Sony. They are currently neck in neck with a Nintendo at 46B USD and Sony at 47B USD. Nintendo is trending up.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Nintendo's biggest disaster was the N64. It seems the generation did irreparable damage to Nintendo's partnerships - permanently losing most of their exclusive Japanese support, as well as Rockstar North/DMA over in the U.K., and they failed to get their grips on RARE, who then sold to Microsoft shortly after the generation.

Nintendo also permanently lost the most iconic RPG series, Final Fantasy. They regained Dragon Quest after a two game outing with Sony, but DQ10 and 11 are both Multiplatform.

Had Nintendo not gone with cartridges on N64, Final Fantasy, Xenogears, and all of those classic PlayStation games would have been on it. It's possible Monolithsoft would have remained Nintendo exclusive as well, even if the breakup with Square did occur... mostly because it's unlikely Namco would have left Nintendo either, but also because Monolithsoft would have been developing Xenosaga on N64. There might not have been a GameCube, as N64 would have been able to live strongly until 2003 - and by then, the Wii technology would have been in the picture.

Of course, it's also possible that Iwata may have never ascended to the top; but he would be near the top.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Mr Puggsly said:
Pyro as Bill said:

Open world (Zelda), online shooter (Splatoon) and motion control fighter (ARMS) at $60 aren't exactly the traditional Nintendo handheld lineup, are they?

The bar has been going up and up on what expect from handheld games. Especially post PSP, 3DS, Vita, and smart devices. Over a decade ago we had console-esque GTA on a portable device.

While the Switch fills the void of a traditional home consoles, it was built for portability. Frankly, I'm happy all the major companies are basically focused on one device now and the traditional home console market is covered by MS, Sony, and technially PC.

Accessibility/simplicity, local multiplayer and dedicated controllers are the main differences between PC gaming and traditional home consoles. How is PC (or MS/Sony for that matter) covering home consoles better than Nintendo? Graphics?



Nov 2016 - NES outsells PS1 (JP)

Don't Play Stationary 4 ever. Switch!

Around the Network
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Nintnedo doesn't take the financial risk that Sony does. If Sony made their consoles gradually lower in power they would make profit as soon as the console launches even if they lost. Nintnedo definitely plays it smart and more conservatively when it comes to expenses and that leads quicker profits and savings.

I'd call the PS4 the safest, most conservative possible console that any one of them could have produced. Competitive launch price, off-the-shelf parts, reasonable upgrade over the past gen that was more in line with previous new gen upgrades than PS2-to-PS3, essentially the same controller layout, no new disc media to introduce, the biggest "gimmick" it had to introduce was the touch pad on the controller. In fact, I'd say the only financial risk Sony has taken with consoles was the PS3. Everything else can easily be justified, and you can understand the thinking behind the PS3 as well.

There's nothing wrong with any of that; 25 years of data shows that playing it conservative for Sony is paying dividends, to put it mildly. I'll go out on a limb and say that there is a market for Sony's consoles. I like Sony being old reliable in contrast to wild and wacky Nintendo.



Feeling threatned by Sony are we? If your thread is about Nintendo, why did you make it about Sony?

Nintendo's situation is very different and just cause the switch is doing better than the Wii U, it doesn't mean their problems went away.

We don't yet know what this market the switch is and how much it draws from the portable market and if theres going to be a sucessor to the 3DS or not. These things are important in order to determine wether Nintendo's market is still shrinking or growing.



I always said this and I'm glad is now more obvious than ever.



Nintendo is always doomed! Just as console gaming is doomed and PC gaming is doomed! Apple is past its prime and also doomed. Sony is doomed because they were in the red for some years! Microsoft is doomed because some folks refuse to use Windows 10! Everyone is doomed! Doomed, I say!



Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.

burninmylight said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Nintnedo doesn't take the financial risk that Sony does. If Sony made their consoles gradually lower in power they would make profit as soon as the console launches even if they lost. Nintnedo definitely plays it smart and more conservatively when it comes to expenses and that leads quicker profits and savings.

I'd call the PS4 the safest, most conservative possible console that any one of them could have produced. Competitive launch price, off-the-shelf parts, reasonable upgrade over the past gen that was more in line with previous new gen upgrades than PS2-to-PS3, essentially the same controller layout, no new disc media to introduce, the biggest "gimmick" it had to introduce was the touch pad on the controller. In fact, I'd say the only financial risk Sony has taken with consoles was the PS3. Everything else can easily be justified, and you can understand the thinking behind the PS3 as well.

There's nothing wrong with any of that; 25 years of data shows that playing it conservative for Sony is paying dividends, to put it mildly. I'll go out on a limb and say that there is a market for Sony's consoles. I like Sony being old reliable in contrast to wild and wacky Nintendo.

The ps4 is definitely sonys safest console (well the only one) but nintnedo turns profit early almost every gen due to conservative spending. The only anomaly for Nintendo was the Wii U which forced them to refuse to cut price because of recouping. Nintendo doesn't play with money. It's respectable but honestly they played the stingy game every holiday season because they were pinching every penny.