No, the only reason Trump "won" is because more than half of our population didn't vote.

Clinton won the PV because of one state that disliked him. You could take California, Texas, Florida, Pennsylvania and Ohio out of the country (4 of the 5 Trump states), and have him win the PV. I think you underestimate his support (he also got more hispanics than Romney, and more black voters as well, while doing slightly worse with whites).

Closet racists I'm pretty sure were a fair size of his voter bloc, it doesn't have to be outright KKK members. And yes, thankfully they are a shrinking minority who lose ground, in 15 years if Trump tried the same strategy he would lose soundly even against an uncharismatic bore like Hilary. 

No. It's not about the car. Like I told you, the question he could respond to was "-Do you want the support of these white nationalists groups?"

You don't need to know who was in the car to answer "No, I don't want the support of these groups:"

No, the only reason Trump "won" is because more than half of our population didn't vote.

Whos to say Clinton would win if those people voted?

I agree fully that the aim should be to minimize spread, and show them that their is opposition, but the problem is that the children of these people will still grow up in most cases harboring the same thoughts, where as if more time and effort was spent in education then their children would have the tools available to question even their parents beliefs.

There have been many documented instances where someone harboring extremist views, was able to not only question those views but actually change the course of their lives through discussion with those whome they previously were aggressive towards, either because of forced contact through joint incarceration, or through events where the opposing sides were able to have communication outside of their associative groups.

While many would argue (and still will) that protesting is an important part of the push against extremist views, it's a short term band-aid solution to a long term problem, and it has led in many cases to the rise of extremism itself, in the opposite direction.

While they are in no means representitive of either movement as a whole, there are many within the BLM and Antifa movements who have progressed to a point of extremist behaviour in tandem to the very extremism they fight, and the question there is, even if for example, these movements were able to completely eradicate groups such as the new neo-nazi groups within america, what then, happens with the splinter cells within their own movement who, during the fight formed their own extremist contingents.

In those instances, large fires would be put out at the expense of starting multiple smaller fires, at first the damage seems significantly reduced but over time the damage could potentially get worse.

Hate breeds hate, the answer is education and discussion, the only problem is nobody is willing to actually try.

Because they believed those polls?

Believe what fairy tale you want.

What point in history did KKK/NeoNazi members not exist in a disparate reality? People need to stop acting like this is something new. It's not, it was just convienant and felt warm and fuzzy to pretend it was gone rather than face up the fact that this ugliness is still here and has been there. 

It will take another 100-200 years for it to really shift in the way people think, probably because by then genetic engineering of humans will render concepts like ethnic identity almost moot (but that's another can of worms, but it does show the futiliy of "racial purists" ... they are on a bus headed off a cliff, they're just too stupid to see it coming).