By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - The Rise and Fall of a certain Star

CGI-Quality said:
TheLastStarFighter said:

-Saying being a mod is more stressful than not is fine - of course it is, as it adds responsibility.  Saying average users can't comprehend the stress levels a douche comment.

-You did something about NX threads that was against the long-standing guidelines of the forum, it was a poor decision, and you reversed it.

-Star was a bad mod.  I gave an example of why - the NX decision was a poor decision.  He gave other examples himself in this very thread.  As a general principal of fairness in law, all laws should be universal and consistent.  So, you shouldn't make an arbitrary rule that all NX discussion must be in one thread.  If it's a good rule it should apply to all hardware, and you would have one thread for each piece of hardware.  Obviously that would be stupid, and once you see that if the rule is applied universally and doesn't work, you sould be able to see that you have stepped across from objectivity to personal preference.  A forum is it's members; their posts and opinions are its content. The mod team should exist to encourage this content to grow as much as possible. My observation is that Star tended to allow his own preference for how discussion should take place or his own feelings on a topic to impede his mission to assist The Forum with its univeral goal of simply allow the discussion to take place.

A. I'm sorry that you misunderstood what I was saying about being a mod, but drop the "douche" nonsense. 

B. The NX Threads - many of them contained duplicate ideas and some were flat out duplicates of previous threads (one of the things we discourage in the Forum Rules). Beyond that, their volume, overall, became too much. Users saw it! Moderators saw it! Although we still see plenty of Switch topics, the amount is much more tame by comparison. So the action taken made a difference.

No, the Switch reveal made a difference.  The only the the NX ban did was curb content, contribution and traffic to the site. NX was the hot topic of the day, and discussion stagnated as posters couldn't start a discussion focused on a particular topic.   We're gamers, we like to over-hype things.



Around the Network
CGI-Quality said:
TheLastStarFighter said:

No, the Switch reveal made a difference.  The only the the NX ban did was curb content, contribution and traffic to the site. NX was the hot topic of the day, and discussion stagnated as posters couldn't start a discussion focused on a particular topic.   We're gamers, we like to over-hype things.

The Switch reveal, itself, made no difference. The NX Thread ban was already in place before it. That's where the changes happened.

If by changes you mean the further decline of posting activity to an all time low, yep, it did that.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=214536&page=1

But stop speculation?  That would have happened naturally with the Switch reveal.  Or do you think people would have been still speculating that it was going to have an AMD chip?  lol.



TheLastStarFighter said:
CGI-Quality said:

The Switch reveal, itself, made no difference. The NX Thread ban was already in place before it. That's where the changes happened.

If by changes you mean the further decline of posting activity to an all time low, yep, it did that.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=214536&page=1

But stop speculation?  That would have happened naturally with the Switch reveal.  Or do you think people would have been still speculating that it was going to have an AMD chip?  lol.

So you're attributing the lower levels of site activity at that time to limited nx threads when it could easily be attributed to a bunch of other things like lengthy time in between sales data updates, certain people getting banned, not much interesting news?