By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - NOW can we kill fatass?

Errorist76 said:
CaptainExplosion said:

Kim Jong Dum just fired an ICBM towards Japan, and it landed near Hokkaido. This is even for the second time this month. Hokkaido's close enough to the mainland, right?

So why not just save us all the trouble and kill the fat piece of shit? He's practically a terrorist in charge of his own backwards country.

So why don't you kill president Dump?!

Seriously...have some of you ignorants still not learned that all your constant wars do is bring terror over the world?! Your own proud oh so forward country is the reason why a lot of people have to suffer on this planet constantly!

You're a much bigger threat to world peace than 10 Putins and Kim Yong Uns combined.

Well aren't you so dramatic. He's not doing anything worth anything close to kind of action in spite of what progressives/liberals whine about it being the end of the world. Anyway, people suffer for millions of reasons. No one really takes this kind of shit seriously. 



Around the Network
Teeqoz said:
What would be the aftermath though? We would validate their propaganda painting the west as evil, he will only be replaced by another crazy person, and the country would be thirsty for war if kill their leader.

Unfortunately we're fast running out of time to find a diplomatic approach to this situation. There's not always a great option on the table.



Aeolus451 said:
Errorist76 said:

So why don't you kill president Dump?!

Seriously...have some of you ignorants still not learned that all your constant wars do is bring terror over the world?! Your own proud oh so forward country is the reason why a lot of people have to suffer on this planet constantly!

You're a much bigger threat to world peace than 10 Putins and Kim Yong Uns combined.

Well aren't you so dramatic. He's not doing anything worth anything close to kind of action in spite of what progressives/liberals whine about it being the end of the world. Anyway, people suffer for millions of reasons. No one really takes this kind of shit seriously. 

Of course you don't, you all live inside your bubble of ignorance. Leave your country once in a while. It's just a matter of perspective who is the real terrorist.



Johnw1104 said:
Teeqoz said:
What would be the aftermath though? We would validate their propaganda painting the west as evil, he will only be replaced by another crazy person, and the country would be thirsty for war if kill their leader.

Unfortunately we're fast running out of time to find a diplomatic approach to this situation. There's not always a great option on the table.

It didn't go so great the last time the US decided to invade a country due to WMDs. Don't think it will go great another time either.



Errorist76 said:
Aeolus451 said:

Well aren't you so dramatic. He's not doing anything worth anything close to kind of action in spite of what progressives/liberals whine about it being the end of the world. Anyway, people suffer for millions of reasons. No one really takes this kind of shit seriously. 

Of course you don't, you all live inside your bubble of ignorance. Leave your country once in a while. It's just a matter of perspective who is the real terrorist.

I don't see many americans strapping bombs to themselves, to their children and to their wifes to attack civilian populations like little cowards because of an extremist interpretation of a religion. *shrugs

It's a matter of prespective, right?



Around the Network
Teeqoz said:
Johnw1104 said:

Unfortunately we're fast running out of time to find a diplomatic approach to this situation. There's not always a great option on the table.

It didn't go so great the last time the US decided to invade a country due to WMDs. Don't think it will go great another time either.

By that same logic you could point out that a number of past US invasions/occupations worked out quite well. They're all very different in nature, so the comparison is flawed.

Besides, an invasion of the kind that we saw in Iraq may not be necessary here.



Agreed, this nuisance should be wiped off the earth.

 

Edit: all those people who are trying to antagonize the americans..... look at how absurd you sound

Edit: trump is not the representative how most Americans are,  they just got stuck between two horrible candidates, and many voted trump in hatred of clinton.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

Johnw1104 said:
Teeqoz said:

It didn't go so great the last time the US decided to invade a country due to WMDs. Don't think it will go great another time either.

By that same logic you could point out that a number of past US invasions/occupations worked out quite well. They're all very different in nature, so the comparison is flawed.

Besides, an invasion of the kind that we saw in Iraq may not be necessary here.

To put a stop to the percieved potential threat from North Korea, you'd absolutely need a full scale invasion. Even if you could manage to somehow assassinate Kim Jong Un, that would just replace him by someone else. That doesn't solve the problem.



Some people here seem really delusional. North Korea is basically holding South Korea hostage, so no military action is possible in practice, and how else do you kill the guy? We're talking about a really, really paranoid country. Have fun with trying to assassinate him, but don't expect to succeed. If you want him dead, it means war, and war means bringing the South Korean society to its knees.

collint0101 said:
He'd nuke Japan or south Korea. If there was some way to just completely wipe north Korea off the map without them blowing up Tokyo someone would have already done it

No need for nukes. As far as I know, even North Korean artillery can reach Seoul, the capital of South Korea.



As much as I would love Kim to be overthrown and killed, I'd prefer to let China take care of their business rather than risk going to war with who knows what.