Quantcast
Would You Rather Lose Sight in One Eye or Lose Your Hearing Entirely?

Forums - General Discussion - Would You Rather Lose Sight in One Eye or Lose Your Hearing Entirely?

Would you rather lose sight in one eye or lose hearing entirely?

I would rather lose sight in one of my eyes 236 89.39%
 
I would rather lose heari... 28 10.61%
 
Total:264
Aeolus451 said:
Ganoncrotch said:

If you done a poll and asked people was 2+2=3 on here.... if more people voted that it was 3 would that make it true?

I mean come on... you live in an era where people voted Trump as president, I would hold off on using Voting right now as a thing to prove a point of right and wrong :D

Right and right are determined by a consensus for the most part so voting is perfect for that.

I think VGchartz alone has proved that Star Wars Kinect added to any poll will get it votes, regardless of if the poll is about your favourite breed of dog.

That said.... I'll always vote for Riding solo!



Fancy hearing me on an amateur podcast with friends gushing over one of my favourite games? https://youtu.be/1I7JfMMxhf8

Around the Network
Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
Comparing a partial loss with a total loss in this kind of situation isn't that hard a choice... I don't think there is much instances that is preferable to lose total hear than 1 eye sight.

For this to be something acceptable maybe 1 eye or complete touch sense... I would probably prefer my sight being intact, but lack of touch could perhaps make sex a lot less pleasing.

More than that, couldn't that be seriously dangerous? I assume no sense of touch would also mean no pain. So if you cut yourself on anything you wouldn't feel it and realise so instead you'd just keep walking around bleeding, until you eventually die from blood loss and you're like "shit, where did that cut come from?".

Not just that, but also suffering burns from catching burning things without noticing, for example. There's an illness called CIPA that does that, and has a lot of drawbacks like not sweating, meaning that you can't regulate your body temperature.

 

*Leaves the PC, still angry at the idea of spending money*



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Lose sight in two eyes so I don't have to read your threads again.

 

 

 

 

A joke.



Losing a leg or your stronger hand (the one you use for most stuff)?



I need music.

And eyepatch is cool.

 

So I choose losing one eye.

 

 



Around the Network
Ganoncrotch said:
DonFerrari said:

Well you can do plastic surgery to become Voldemort and them your sight would improve a lot

what I can see out of my right eye... if I only open that and focus (my brain just takes the image away when both are open so that I can actually see a clear image) is actually a giant Lightning bolt shaped black scar with a tiny amount of peripheral vision around it (just some black and white rods, no cones) so I get free Harry Potter Scar Vision if I need it!

Uhnnn nice. So you already are almost up there =]

Ka-pi96 said:
DonFerrari said:
Comparing a partial loss with a total loss in this kind of situation isn't that hard a choice... I don't think there is much instances that is preferable to lose total hear than 1 eye sight.

For this to be something acceptable maybe 1 eye or complete touch sense... I would probably prefer my sight being intact, but lack of touch could perhaps make sex a lot less pleasing.

More than that, couldn't that be seriously dangerous? I assume no sense of touch would also mean no pain. So if you cut yourself on anything you wouldn't feel it and realise so instead you'd just keep walking around bleeding, until you eventually die from blood loss and you're like "shit, where did that cut come from?".

Yes it's quite dangerous to live without touch... but actually total impairment on sight, hearing, touch and smell can be quite dangerous... but we can avoid danger with some adaptation, but I have no idea how much sex would lose on being touchless.

JEMC said:
Ka-pi96 said:

More than that, couldn't that be seriously dangerous? I assume no sense of touch would also mean no pain. So if you cut yourself on anything you wouldn't feel it and realise so instead you'd just keep walking around bleeding, until you eventually die from blood loss and you're like "shit, where did that cut come from?".

Not just that, but also suffering burns from catching burning things without noticing, for example. There's an illness called CIPA that does that, and has a lot of drawbacks like not sweating, meaning that you can't regulate your body temperature.

 

*Leaves the PC, still angry at the idea of spending money*

Right you are, several harsh accidents caused by this disease.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Ganoncrotch said:
Aeolus451 said:

Right and right are determined by a consensus for the most part so voting is perfect for that.

I think VGchartz alone has proved that Star Wars Kinect added to any poll will get it votes, regardless of if the poll is about your favourite breed of dog.

That said.... I'll always vote for Riding solo!

That's cringe-worthy.... lol



Ganoncrotch said:
Aeolus451 said:

Right and right are determined by a consensus for the most part so voting is perfect for that.

I think VGchartz alone has proved that Star Wars Kinect added to any poll will get it votes, regardless of if the poll is about your favourite breed of dog.

That said.... I'll always vote for Riding solo!

That video is just...

And they were surprised when people didn't want tos pend $100 more to get a kinect.



PS4 and PC gaming

 

PC Specs:
AMD Ryzen 9 3900x
Zotac Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
32GB DDR4 Corsair Vengence Ram 3200 mhz
1TB Samsung Qvo SSD
Corsair Spec-Delta Case
Asus ROG B450-F Motherboard

Aeolus451 said:
Ganoncrotch said:

I think VGchartz alone has proved that Star Wars Kinect added to any poll will get it votes, regardless of if the poll is about your favourite breed of dog.

That said.... I'll always vote for Riding solo!

That's cringe-worthy.... lol

That game and video actually makes the pain of Han's death less painful when you think of him there.... riding solo.... he's Han Solo..... I want to die.....

Sadly in terms of Kinect actually working the Dance portion is one of the few bits of the game which actually works, I own the game and yeah... some of the other modes just don't function correctly at all.



Fancy hearing me on an amateur podcast with friends gushing over one of my favourite games? https://youtu.be/1I7JfMMxhf8

Ganoncrotch said:

Lived my whole life with sight in just one eye, honestly it's grand, your brain adjusts and you learn to compensate for certain things, like... when someone lobs you a ball you learn how to perfectly... duck out of the way, rather than try and fail to catch it :D

Also video games are great with just 1 eye because everything is on a flat panel with just an illusion of depth :) my world is the same as what you see on your monitor basically.

That said.... I am very very careful obviously to mind my remaining eye... the thought of it being damaged in a accident of any kind is a huge worry to me.

 

 

@OP should I technically vote for losing hearing? because if I lost sight in one eye... I would be fresh out of eyes.

Yes I think you should technically vote for losing hearing!  Unless you would prefer being blind over being deaf.

I think you are the first person in here to have a legit reason for not losing sight in one eye!