Quantcast
Would You Rather Lose Sight in One Eye or Lose Your Hearing Entirely?

Forums - General Discussion - Would You Rather Lose Sight in One Eye or Lose Your Hearing Entirely?

Would you rather lose sight in one eye or lose hearing entirely?

I would rather lose sight in one of my eyes 236 89.39%
 
I would rather lose heari... 28 10.61%
 
Total:264

Would you rather lose a testicle or a leg?



Around the Network
Ganoncrotch said:
StokedUp said:
This is a bit obviously lol.
Losing sight in one eye would hardly affect you, it would just ruin you're sight at judging depth you can go on living a perfectly normal life.

It's not just losing depth, you also lose peripheral vision on the side where it's missing, I'm missing my right eye and when cycling I have to take extra care of anything coming from that side of me since my left wont quite see it over the bridge of my nose, means an extra head turn in some instances.

Try it for a bit, put something over or just close one eye, pick either one and go for a cycle, you'll see very fast what I mean, you'll hate the bridge of your nose after a bit.

Well you can do plastic surgery to become Voldemort and them your sight would improve a lot



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

I know a guy that lost sight in one eye due to a fight in high school or whatever. Turns out he is a great drunk driver.



Areym said:
WrathofTank said:

I know, I tried telling my friends the same.  I'm just polling my forums so I can prove them wrong

Eh, do you really wanna be 'that guy'? Like, you took the argument so seriously, you polled people on the internet to make a point?

Yes, I can't take the affront to my intelligence, it's like someone trying to convince you that 2+2 = 3.  They are wrong!  Lol seriously though it's just for fun the argument wasn't very serious but I still want to give them a hard time 



I could lose an eye in trade for keeping my hearing.



Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
Ganoncrotch said:

It's not just losing depth, you also lose peripheral vision on the side where it's missing, I'm missing my right eye and when cycling I have to take extra care of anything coming from that side of me since my left wont quite see it over the bridge of my nose, means an extra head turn in some instances.

Try it for a bit, put something over or just close one eye, pick either one and go for a cycle, you'll see very fast what I mean, you'll hate the bridge of your nose after a bit.

Well you can do plastic surgery to become Voldemort and them your sight would improve a lot

what I can see out of my right eye... if I only open that and focus (my brain just takes the image away when both are open so that I can actually see a clear image) is actually a giant Lightning bolt shaped black scar with a tiny amount of peripheral vision around it (just some black and white rods, no cones) so I get free Harry Potter Scar Vision if I need it!



Fancy hearing me on an amateur podcast with friends gushing over one of my favourite games? https://youtu.be/1I7JfMMxhf8

Ka-pi96 said:
JEMC said:

I agree that eating without taste would be extremely boring, and that losing the smell would avoid you to notice certain smells (entering a bathromm after it's being used... >.<), but to me smell is important as I have a gas kitchen and that's the only sense that could tell me if there's something wrong.

If it came to that couldn't you just get one of those gas detecting birds for your kitchen?

Wha...! Do you expect me from spending money? I'm catalan, we're cheap.

***leaves keyboard mumbling... "to buy something, says! Huh! Who does he think I am?***

 

sethnintendo said:
Would you rather lose a testicle or a leg?

Now that's a harder question! I know a few that would opt to keep his two buddies.



Please excuse my bad English.

Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

DonFerrari said:
Comparing a partial loss with a total loss in this kind of situation isn't that hard a choice... I don't think there is much instances that is preferable to lose total hear than 1 eye sight.

For this to be something acceptable maybe 1 eye or complete touch sense... I would probably prefer my sight being intact, but lack of touch could perhaps make sex a lot less pleasing.

More than that, couldn't that be seriously dangerous? I assume no sense of touch would also mean no pain. So if you cut yourself on anything you wouldn't feel it and realise so instead you'd just keep walking around bleeding, until you eventually die from blood loss and you're like "shit, where did that cut come from?".



Bet Shiken that COD would outsell Battlefield in 2018. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8749702

WrathofTank said:
Areym said:

Eh, do you really wanna be 'that guy'? Like, you took the argument so seriously, you polled people on the internet to make a point?

Yes, I can't take the affront to my intelligence, it's like someone trying to convince you that 2+2 = 3.  They are wrong!  Lol seriously though it's just for fun the argument wasn't very serious but I still want to give them a hard time 

If you done a poll and asked people was 2+2=3 on here.... if more people voted that it was 3 would that make it true?

I mean come on... you live in an era where people voted Trump as president, I would hold off on using Voting right now as a thing to prove a point of right and wrong :D



Fancy hearing me on an amateur podcast with friends gushing over one of my favourite games? https://youtu.be/1I7JfMMxhf8

Ganoncrotch said:
WrathofTank said:

Yes, I can't take the affront to my intelligence, it's like someone trying to convince you that 2+2 = 3.  They are wrong!  Lol seriously though it's just for fun the argument wasn't very serious but I still want to give them a hard time 

If you done a poll and asked people was 2+2=3 on here.... if more people voted that it was 3 would that make it true?

I mean come on... you live in an era where people voted Trump as president, I would hold off on using Voting right now as a thing to prove a point of right and wrong :D

Right and right are determined by a consensus for the most part so voting is perfect for that.