By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Dunkirk Reviews - 94 Metacritic - 92% RottenTomatoes

Goodnightmoon said:
Lawlight said:

It was dull. The character was dull and unsympathetic. The pace was slow and they tried to show his grief but I can't keep watching a guy do mundane things just for the director to add minutes to his movie.

But you frequently show little sensibility and little understanding about what good cinema is, also you talk like only critics liked Manchester By the Sea which is far from reality. With a quick look I saw the movie has an 8 on Imdb from almost 150k votes, it also has a 8.2 of userscore in metacritic, a 4/5 from the users of Rottentomatoes and is included in the Top 10 favourite movies of 2016 by the users of Filmaffinity (Placed 4th on the list)

It has a 7.9, not an 8 on IMDB but people are often sheep when it comes to movies. Reviews influence them to like a movie or dislike a movie. This is especially with art movies. They feel like if they don't like something critics like they will come off as uncultured when in fact critics are just snobs.



Around the Network
Lawlight said:
Goodnightmoon said:

But you frequently show little sensibility and little understanding about what good cinema is, also you talk like only critics liked Manchester By the Sea which is far from reality. With a quick look I saw the movie has an 8 on Imdb from almost 150k votes, it also has a 8.2 of userscore in metacritic, a 4/5 from the users of Rottentomatoes and is included in the Top 10 favourite movies of 2016 by the users of Filmaffinity (Placed 4th on the list)

It has a 7.9, not an 8 on IMDB but people are often sheep when it comes to movies. Reviews influence them to like a movie or dislike a movie. This is especially with art movies. They feel like if they don't like something critics like they will come off as uncultured when in fact critics are just snobs.

You and your infinite excuses



Is it just me or RottenTomatoes seem to be easily pleased lately. This does look like a good movie.



Goodnightmoon said:
Lawlight said:

It has a 7.9, not an 8 on IMDB but people are often sheep when it comes to movies. Reviews influence them to like a movie or dislike a movie. This is especially with art movies. They feel like if they don't like something critics like they will come off as uncultured when in fact critics are just snobs.

You and your infinite excuses

You are free to like dull movies - I'm not preventing you from watching them. Watch Logan - it follows that dull, artsy, long shots of nothing trend. I'm sure you'll like it too.



Lawlight said:
Goodnightmoon said:

You and your infinite excuses

You are free to like dull movies - I'm not preventing you from watching them. Watch Logan - it follows that dull, artsy, long shots of nothing trend. I'm sure you'll like it too.

Says someone that praised Batman VS Superman... Everytime you speak you make my point stronger, poor taste and excuses. Since we clearly are not gonna agree better to not derrail this more.



Around the Network
Goodnightmoon said:
taus90 said:

I m Just pointing out you said it was about Taste. Manchester by the sea is a good movie, not great but thats subjective to my taste.. I dont think there are any bad stories, what makes it bad is the way its told and executed on the big screen, just recently i saw The Judge, the story was great but the execution was sloppy.. even a story about boy meeting girl story could be told in an amazing way.. (titanic).. and this is where Nolan comes in because his movie can cater to different audiences which include law light who like the big explosion & stuff and also respect audience like me and you with mature store telling and doesnt take his audience as idiots.. Barring the third act of Interstellar and TDKR

Fair enough, I think the same about the importance of execution over the story btw and yes, Nolan is a great director (a bit too overrated by some though) that can succesfully catter to very different audiences, which is cool.

I think he is overated in the sense WB gives him literraly a blank cheque to make films, which shouldnt cost half what the final budget ends up.. and he plays it too safe with actors he tend to cast same actors and works in his comfort.. the only exception was Inception.. coz he was working with new actors and was working on deadline to start production on TDKR. But still I would take nolan over many "big blockbuster directors" except Edgar Wright.

 



Goodnightmoon said:
Lawlight said:

You are free to like dull movies - I'm not preventing you from watching them. Watch Logan - it follows that dull, artsy, long shots of nothing trend. I'm sure you'll like it too.

Says someone that praised Batman VS Superman... Everytime you speak you make my point stronger, poor taste and excuses. Since we clearly are not gonna agree better to not derrail this more.

What can I say, I enjoyed BvS on first viewing. Not so much afterwards but it would have been much better received if it followed the superhero formula and be generic. Or if it was a slow, plodding movie with Bruce Wayne doing menial things. Do you think a scene with him getting up and making breakfast for 5 minutes would be art enough?



Azzanation said:
Is it just me or RottenTomatoes seem to be easily pleased lately. This does look like a good movie.

Rottentomatoes is very predictable in what they like.



yay won tickets to see the movie on monday.
I haven't seen a trailer nor read anything about it thus far.



S.Peelman said:
Metacritic is bad for movies, it's always all over the place. Anything goes and scores almost never make sense. IMDb is always much closer to the truth, on IMDb though we'll still have to wait until the general public has seen it.

Metacritic is a toxic way in general to evaluate a play.